Advertisement

Aphorisms and Fragments

  • Guy ElgatEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter’s aim is to explore various views on the relation of the aphoristic and fragmentary form to philosophy: what philosophical purpose does this form serve? What is the philosophy behind the use of the aphoristic form (what specific content about the world, human psychology, and so on is communicated implicitly by the use of this form)? What is the meta-philosophy behind its use (what view about philosophy specifically informs the use of the aphoristic form)? Can aphorisms or fragments be organized to form an integrated philosophical whole? The chapter focuses on the exemplary case of Nietzsche’s use of fragments and aphorisms.

Keywords

Form Nietzsche Psychology Meta-philosophy Whole 

References

  1. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1966a. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by W. Kaufmann. New York, NY: Vintage. [BGE]Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1966b. The Wanderer and His Shadow. In Human, All Too Human, trans. R.J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [WS]Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1967. On the Genealogy of Morals. In On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. W. Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale. New York, NY: Vintage. [GM]Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1968. The Will to Power. Translated by W. Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale. New York, NY: Vintage. [WP]Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1974. The Gay Science. Translated by W. Kaufmann. New York, NY: Vintage. [GS]Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1984. Human, All Too Human. Translated by M. Faber. London: Penguin Books. [HH]Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1999. Kritische Studienausgabe. Compiled under the general editorship of G. Colli and M. Montinari. Berlin and New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter. [KSA]Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2005. Twilight of the Idols. In The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols: And Other Writings, trans. J. Norman and A. Ridley and ed. J. Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [TI]Google Scholar

Works by Others

  1. Cioran, Emil M. 1970. The Temptation to Exist. Translated by H. Richard. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1995. Oeuvres. Paris: Quarto Gallimard.Google Scholar
  3. Elgat, Guy. 2015. Nietzsche’s Critique of Pure Altruism—Developing an Argument from Human, All Too Human. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (3): 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Faber, Marion. 1984. Introduction to Human, All Too Human. In Human, All Too Human, trans. M. Faber. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Grant, Ben. 2016. The Aphorism and Other Short Forms. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. La Rochefoucauld, François. 2007. Collected Maxims and Other Reflections. Translated and introduction by E.H. Blackmore, A.M. Blackmore, and F. Giguère. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lichtenberg, Georg C. 1990. The Waste Books. Translated and introduction by R.J. Hollingdale. New York, NY: New York Review Books.Google Scholar
  8. Marsden, Jill. 2006. Nietzsche and the Art of the Aphorism. In A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. K. Ansell Pearson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Moore, Will G. 1969. La Rochefoucauld: His Mind and Art. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Morson, Gary S. 2012. The Long and the Short of It: From Aphorism to Novel. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nordmann, Alfred. 2005. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pascal, Blaise. 1973. Pensées. Translated and introduction by A.J. Krailsheimer. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  13. Reginster, Bernard. 2006. The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on the Overcoming of Nihilism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1995. On the Basis of Morality. Translated by E.F.J Payne. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Starobinski, Jean. 1966. La Rochefoucauld et les Morales Substitutives. Nouvelle Revue Française 28 (16–33): 211–229.Google Scholar
  16. Stern, Joseph P. 1959. Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions—Reconstructed from his Aphorisms and Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, W.D. 1952. Nietzsche and the French. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1990. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Zöeller, Günter. 1992. Lichtenberg and Kant on the Subject of Thinking. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (3): 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For Further Reading

  1. Cooper, Neil. 1995. Aphorisms in Philosophical Thinking. Bradley Studies 5 (2): 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Faber, Marion. 1986. The Metamorphosis of the French Aphorism: La Rochefoucauld and Nietzsche. Comparative Literature Studies 23 (3): 205–217.Google Scholar
  3. Marton, Scarlett. 2011. Afternoon Thoughts. Nietzsche and the Dogmatism of Philosophical Writing. In Nietzsche on Instinct and Language, ed. J. Constâncio and M.J.M. Branco. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Morson, Gary S. 2003. The Aphorism: Fragments from the Breakdown of Reason. New Literary History 34 (3): 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Shapiro, Gary. 1984. Nietzschean Aphorism as Art and Act. Man and World 17 (3): 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Westerdale, Joel. 2013. Nietzsche’s Aphoristic Challenge. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of the Art Institute of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations