Religion and Literature: Exegesis, Hermeneutics, Post-Modern Theories

  • Shira Wolosky


Literature and religion have often been neighboring rivals, each offering multiple dimensions of meaning to experience. Each also has been traditionally defined in terms of a governing unity. But post-metaphysical critique has challenged the overarching reference to unity in favor of a recognition and embrace of difference. Taking the history of American poetics, this chapter pursues the implications of the shift from traditional metaphysics of unity through post-metaphysical critiques towards redefining both aesthetic and religious meanings through difference and multiplicity.


Post-metaphysical Aesthetic Unity Multiplicity Exegesis 


  1. Auerbach, Erich. 1984. Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Augustine. 1958. On Christian Doctrine. Translated by D.W. Robertson Jr. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1981. Confessions. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1975. Puritan Origins of the American Self. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eliot, T.S. 1944. The Uses of Poetry and the Uses of Criticism. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1950. Poetry and Drama. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  8. Frei, Hans. 1974. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hick, John. 1977. Evil and the God of Love. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
  10. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1962. Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks. Chicago: Gateway.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1989. On Truth and Lies in a Non-Moral Sense, 246–256. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Preus, James. 1969. From Shadow to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolosky, Shira. 1998. An “Other” Negative Theology: On Derrida’s “How to Avoid Speaking: Denials”. Poetics Today 19 (2, Summer): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2009. Emerson’s Figural Religion: From Poetics to Politics. Religion and Literature 41 (1, Spring): 25–48. Ed. Paul Kane.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2010. Poetry and Public Discourse in Nineteenth Century America. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2011. Edward Taylor’s American Hebraism. In Turn Around Religion, ed. Michael Kramer and Nan Goodman, 287–312. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shira Wolosky
    • 1
  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations