Law and the Literary Imagination: The Continuing Relevance of Literature to Modern Legal Scholarship

  • Julia J. A. ShawEmail author


Although the sheer technicality of the law’s concepts and categories often inhibits any discussion of their own premises, literature is able to illuminate the world by means of imagistic language, elucidating important moral values and social ideas. Therefore, historically, philosophical writings, literary texts and tropes have been important sources of reference and inspiration in the formation of key legal concepts such as justice, rights, authority, freedom and equality. The relationship between law and literature is nothing new as both are cultural practices and share a mutual interest in meaning-making. Just as art is said to imitate life, law emulates life through invention and fiction. This chapter explores the significance of a literary imagination to lawmakers and legal scholars alike, particularly in response to the modern moral and legal dilemmas posed by our increasingly complex society.


 Literature  Law Literary Imagination  Fiction  Justice 


  1. Atwood, M. 1985. Justice in the Literary Tradition. In Justice Beyond Orwell, ed. R.S. Abella and M.L. Rothman, 515. Montreal: Les Editions Yvon Blais Inc. (Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice).Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, F. 1960. The Advancement of Learning and New Atlantis (The World’s Classics Series). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. 2001. Impossible Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Dor, O. 2011. Law and Art: Justice, Ethics and Aesthetics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardozo, B.N. 1931. Law and Literature. In Law and Literature and Other Essays and Addresses. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  7. Cover, R.M. 1983. The Supreme Court 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review 97 (4): 9.Google Scholar
  8. Douzinas, C., and L. Nead. 1999. Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, T. 2015. Graphic Justice: Intersections of Comics and Law. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodrich, P. 1986. Reading the Law: Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1987. Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1996. Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2001. Europe in America: Grammatology, Legal Studies, and the Politics of Transmission. Columbia Law Review 101 (8): 2033–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2007. The New Casuistry. Critical Inquiry 33 (4): 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Flores quae faciunt coronam or the Flowers of Common Law. In Law and Art: Justice, Ethics and Aesthetics, ed. O. Ben-Dor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2013. Legal Emblems and the Art of Law: Obiter Depicta as the Vision of Governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurnham, D. 2014. Crime, Desire and Law’s Unconscious: Law, Literature and Culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, A.C. 1988. Dwelling on the Threshold: Critical Essays on Modern Legal Thought. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
  19. Manderson. 2000. Songs without Words: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Moran, L.J. 2012. Legal Studies after the Cultural Turn: A Case Study of Judicial Research. In Social Research after the Cultural Turn, ed. S. Roseneil and S. Frosh, 124–143. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelken, D. 1993. The Truth about Law’s Truth. In European Yearbook for the Sociology of Law, ed. A. Febbrajo and D. Nelken, 87–163. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
  22. Nussbaum, M.C. 1995a. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1995b. Poets as Judges: Judicial Rhetoric and the Judicial Imagination. University of Chicago Law Review 62 (4): 1477–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plato. 1961. Collected Dialogues of Plato. Edited by E. Hamilton and H. Cairns. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  25. Posner, R. 1988. Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sarat, A. 2004. Law in the Liberal Arts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, W. 1954. Guy Mannering, 259. London and New York, NY: Dent and Dutton.Google Scholar
  28. Shaw, J.J.A. 2012. The Continuing Relevance of Ars Poetica to Legal Scholarship and the Modern Lawyer. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 25 (1): 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2014. Introduction to the Special Issue on Law and Literature. Liverpool Law Review: A Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Policy Issues 35 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2017. Aesthetics of Law and Literary License: An Anatomy of the Legal Imagination. Liverpool Law Review: A Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Policy Issues 38 (2): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shaw, J.J.A., and H.J. Shaw. 2015. The Politics and Poetics of Spaces and Places: Mapping the Multiple Geographies of Identity in a Cultural Posthuman Era. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change 12 (3): 234–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trotsky, L. 1925. The Social Roots and the Social Function of Literature. In Literature and Revolution, trans. R. Strunsky. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  33. Ward, I. 2009. Law, Text, Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weisberg, R.H. 1992. Poethics and Other Strategies of Law and Literature, 81–83. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2011. Law and Literature as Survivor. In Teaching Law and Literature, ed. A. Sarat, C.O. Frank, and M. Anderson, 40–60. New York, NY: MLA.Google Scholar
  36. Weizman, E. 2017. Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. West, R. 2008. Literature, Culture and Law. Georgetown Law Faculty Working Papers, No. 75.Google Scholar
  38. White, J.B. 1973. The Legal Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1985. Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1990. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1999. Writing and Reading in Philosophy, Law and Poetry. In Law and Literature: Current Legal Issues Volume 2, ed. M. Freeman and A. Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2008. Living Speech: Resisting the Empire of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2012. Justice in Tension: An Expression of Law and the Legal Mind. No Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law and Justice 9: 1–19. Accessed November 27, 2016.
  44. Wiener, M.J. 2004. Men of Blood: Violence, Manliness, and Criminal Justice in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wigmore, J.H. 1908. A List of One Hundred Legal Novels. Illinois Law Review 2: 574.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations