• Bill AshcroftEmail author


Postcolonialism deals with the effects of colonization on cultures and societies and those societies’ responses. While the analysis of the controlling power of representation began with Fanon in the 1950s and reached a climax with Edward Said’s Orientalism, leading to the development of colonial discourse theory of Bhabha and Spivak, postcolonial analysis arose in the late 1980s as a direct response to writers’ engagement with imperial power. Postcolonial theory arose in conjunction with the dominance of literary theory in the late twentieth century but distinguished its practice from the Eurocentric and universalist nature of contemporary theory. Its rapid rise to prominence in the 1990s came about because it offered a language with which to approach the phenomenon of cultural globalization. Postcolonialism is now used in wide and diverse ways to include the place of translation, of the sacred and of biopolitics, ecological theory and animal rights and, most importantly, to widen its interest in the relation between local communities and global influences to include the global flows of populations, diaspora, cosmopolitanism and the transnational.


Globalization Local Transnational Cosmopolitan Power 


  1. Achebe, C. 1975. Morning Yet on Creation Day. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, A. 1995. The Politics of Literary Postcoloniality. Race and Class 36 (3): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Appiah, A.K. 1992. In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Arteaga, A. 1994. An Other Tongue: Nation and Ethnicity in the Linguistic Borderlands. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ashcroft, B. 2001. Post-colonial Transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Ashcroft, W.D., M. Cotter, J. Docker, and S. Nandan. 1977. New Literature Review 2 ‘Special issue: Postcolonial Literature’.Google Scholar
  8. Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin. 1989. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Postcolonial Literatures. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brathwaite, E.K. 1981. English in the Caribbean: Notes on Nation Language and Poetry: An Electronic Lecture. In English Literature: Opening Up the Canon, ed. L.A. Fiedler and H.A. Baker Jr., 15–53. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dirlik, A. 1996. The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism. In Contemporary Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, ed. P. Mongia. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. 1971. Orders of Discourse. Social Science Information 10 (2): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gikandi, S. 2001. Globalization and the Claims of Postcoloniality. The South Atlantic Quarterly 100 (3): 627–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilroy, P. 2004. After Empire: Melancholia of Convivial Culture. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horkheimer, M. 1974. Eclipse of Reason. New York, NY: Seabury Press (originally published 1947).Google Scholar
  16. Huggan, G., and H. Tiffin. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kroetsch, R. 1974. Unhiding the Hidden: Recent Canadian Fiction. Journal of Canadian Fiction 3 (3): 394–396. Cited in Ashcroft et al. (1995).Google Scholar
  18. Lawrence, D.H. 1915. The Rainbow. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, D. 1974. Cadence, Country, Silence: Writing in Colonial Space. Boundary 2 (3): 1.Google Scholar
  20. Macaulay, T.B. 1835. Minute on Indian Education. In Speeches, ed. G.M. Young. Oxford: Oxford University Press (AMS Edition, 1979).Google Scholar
  21. McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Nemser, W. 1971. Systems of Foreign Language Learners. IRAL (International Review of Applied Linguistics) 9 (2, May): 115–124.Google Scholar
  23. Ruthven, K. 1968. Yeats, Lawrence and the Savage God. Critical Quarterly 10 (1 and 2, Spring/Summer): 39–54.Google Scholar
  24. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1979. The Question of Palestine. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1981. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1983. The World, the Text and the Critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  29. Selinker, L. 1972. Inter-Language. IRAL (International Review of Applied Linguistics) 10 (2, May): 209–231.Google Scholar
  30. Slemon, S. 1994. The Scramble for Postcolonialism. In De-scribing Empire: Postcolonialism and Textuality, ed. C. Tiffin and A. Lawson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Viswanathan, G. 1987. The Beginnings of English Literary Study in India. Oxford Literary Review 9 (1 and 2): 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, L. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Young, R. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations