Advertisement

Case Study Part Two: Unconscious Gender Role-Playing

  • Alexandra Walker
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter continues the case study of gender and examines the unconscious material of the global community in relation to gender equality and justice. It shows that the unconscious split between masculine and feminine has led to a construct of women as victims and men as dominators. Men have been conflated with masculine consciousness and women have been conflated with feminine consciousness. This archetypal split has been destructive in a number of ways, and has continued to devalue the feminine and the private sphere. Men have also been denied their right to access feminine consciousness.

Bibliography

  1. Anaya, J. (1996). Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Australian Social Trends: Fathers’ Work and Family Balance. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved September 27, 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Measures of Australia’s Progress, 2010: Suicide. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved September 27, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, J. (2018). Stay-at-home Fathers in Australia. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved July 6, 2018, from https://aifs.gov.au/publications/stay-home-dads.
  5. Bennett, P. (2006). Abnormal and Clinical Psychology: An Introductory Textbook. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, T. R., & Engdahl, E. (1998). The Social Construction of Consciousness, Part One: Collective Consciousness and Its Socio-Cultural Foundations. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(1), 67–85.Google Scholar
  7. Charlesworth, H. (1999). Feminist Methods in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 93, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlesworth, H., & Chinkin, C. (2000). The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, R. W. (2000). The Men and the Boys. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, R. (Ed.). (1994). Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Day, M. (2012). Circumcision is Grievous Bodily Harm, German Judges Rule. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved July 6, 2018.Google Scholar
  12. De Beauvoir, S. (1953). The Second Sex (H. M. Parshley, Ed. and Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, A. (2011). Violence against Women under International Human Rights Law. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Engle Merry, S. (2006). Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, M. (2008). The Hidden Spirituality of Men: Ten Metaphors to Awaken the Sacred Masculine. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
  18. Grosz, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kegan Gardiner, J. (Ed.). (1995). Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A Cultural History. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lansink, A. (2010). Final Report: Women and Migration. In International Law Association, The Hague Conference (2010): Feminism in International Law (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
  22. Laughlin, H. (1970). The Ego and Its Defenses. New York City: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  23. McAfee, N. (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyersfield, B. (2010). Domestic Violence and International Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Milos, M., & Fayre, D. M. (1992). Circumcision: A Medical or a Human Rights Issue? Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 37(2), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moores, D. J. (2005, October). Young Goodman Brown’s ‘Evil Purpose’: Hawthorne and the Jungian Shadow. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 27(3/4), 4–17.Google Scholar
  27. Nolan, M. (2008). Construing Human Rights: Protecting Subgroups and Individuals. Saarbruecken: VDM Verlag Dr Mueller.Google Scholar
  28. Papadopoulos, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice and Applications. Hove and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, G. (2000a). What Lies Outside Language? Philosophical Investigations, 23(4), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson, S. (2000b). Marked Men: White Masculinity in Crisis. New York and Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stein, M. (Ed.). (1984). Jungian Analysis. Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Tacey, D. (2006). How to Read Jung. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  33. Tong, R. (2009). Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  34. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). UN Doc. A/RES217 A (111).Google Scholar
  35. United Nations. (2011). Global Issues: Women. United Nations, New York. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/women/
  36. United Nations News Centre. (2011). Boosting Women’s Political Participation Vital for Democracy, UN Forum Stresses. United Nations, New York, Retrieved October 5, 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Walsh, R. (1984). Staying Alive: The Psychology of Human Survival. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  38. World Health Organization. (2011). Mental Health, Country Reports and Charts Available. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved September 27, 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Young-Eisendrath, P., & Dawson, T. (Eds.). (1997). The Cambridge Companion to Jung. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Social ImpactUNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations