Building Evaluation into the Development of Interprofessional Education Initiatives

  • Susan Pullon
  • Ben Darlow
  • Eileen McKinlay


Although many methods currently used to teach health professional students have not been evaluated and continue to be used without challenge, innovations need to earn their place in the curriculum. Interprofessional education (IPE) represents such an innovation. The value (or lack thereof) of an IPE initiative can best be demonstrated by robust evaluation processes (Institute of Medicine, 2015). Evaluation is important not only for indicating whether IPE programmes are effective, but also for exploring where, how, why and for what purpose (Freeth, Hammick, Reeves, Koppell, & Barr, 2005; Payler, Meyer, & Humphris, 2008. Evaluation provides the mechanism for accountability, using appropriate, justifiable methods that adequately consider the essential elements of a particular programme (in this case, interprofessionality) (Alkin & Christie, 2004). Hansen and colleagues usefully describe five key facets of various logic models of evaluation: underlying assumptions, evaluation context, evaluation activities, evaluation consequences and external factors which may limit the intended effect of the evaluation (Hansen, Alkin, & Wallace, 2013). While this chapter will focus primarily on discussing evaluation activities, these are considered throughout in relation to assumptions, context and consequences.


  1. Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, H., & Lowe, H. (2013). Introducing interprofessional education. Fareham, England: Centre for Advancement of Interprofessional education (CAIPE). [Accessed 7 November 2015].
  3. Bleakley, A. (2013). Working in ‘teams’ in an era of ‘liquid’ healthcare: What is the use of theory? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakraborti, C., Boonyasai, R. T., Wright, S. M., & Kern, D. E. (2008). A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 846–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curran, V., Hollett, A., Casimiro, L. M., McCarthy, P., Banfield, V., Hall, P., et al. (2011). Development and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curran, V. R., Sharpe, D., & Forristall, J. (2007). Attitudes of health sciences faculty members towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Medical Education, 41, 892–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darlow, B., Coleman, K., McKinlay, E., Donovan, S., Beckingsale, L., Gray, B., et al. (2015). The positive impact of interprofessional education: A controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students. BMC Medical Education, 15, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darlow, B., Donovan, S., Coleman, K., McKinlay, E., Beckingsale, L., Gallagher, P., et al. (in press). What makes an interprofessional education programme meaningful to students? Journal Interprofessional Care,
  9. Egan-Lee, E., Baker, L., Tobin, S., Hollenberg, E., Dematteo, D., & Reeves, S. (2011). Neophyte facilitator experiences of interprofessional education: Implications for faculty development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman, S., Wright, A., & Lindqvist, S. (2010). Facilitator training for educators involved in interprofessional learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeth, D., Hammick, M., Reeves, S., Koppell, I., & Barr, H. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: Development, delivery and evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., et al. (2010). Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet, 376, 1923–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, P., Pullon, S., Skinner, M., McHugh, P., McKinlay, E., & Gray, L. (2015). An interprofessional community education project as a socially accountable assessment. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5) 509–511, doi:10.3109/13561820.2015.1004040.Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert, J. H., Yan, J., & Hoffman, S. J. (2010). A WHO report: Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Journal of Allied Health, 39(Suppl 1), 196–197.Google Scholar
  15. Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 29, 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen, M., Alkin, M. C., & Wallace, T. L. (2013). Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories. Evaluation and Programme Planning, 38, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinemann, G. D., Schmitt, M. H., Farrell, M. P., & Brallier, S. A. (1999). Development of an attitudes toward health care teams scale. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 22, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hepburn, K., Tsukuda, R. A., & Fasser, C. (2002). Team skills scale. In G. D. Heinemann & A. M. Zeiss (Eds.), Team performance in health care: Assessment and development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Institute of Medicine. (2015). Measuring the impact of interprofessional education (IPE) on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. Washington: Institute of Medicine. [Accessed 7 November 2015].Google Scholar
  20. Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., & Gilligan, C. (2013). A systematic review of the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health professional programmes. Nurse Education Today, 33, 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malatest International. (2015). Tairāwhiti interprofessional education programme—Evaluation report year-end 2014. Wellington, NZ: Malatest International.Google Scholar
  22. McKinlay, E., Gallagher, P., Gray, L., Wilson, C., & Pullon, S. (2015). Sixteen Months “From Square One”: The Process of Forming an Interprofessional Clinical Teaching Team. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, 5(2).Google Scholar
  23. Missen, K., Jacob, E. R., Barnett, T., Walker, L., & Cross, M. (2012). Interprofessional clinical education: Clinicians’ views on the importance of leadership. Collegian, 19, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson, S., Tassone, M., & Hodges, B. (2014). Creating the health care team of the future. The Toronto model for interprofessional education and practice. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. O’Brien, D., McCallin, A., & Basset, S. (2013). Student perceptions of an interprofessional clinical experience at a university clinic. NZ Journal of Physiotherapy, 41(3), 81–89.Google Scholar
  26. O’Neill, B. J., & Wyness, M. A. (2005). Student voices on an interprofessional course. Medical Teacher, 27, 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2005). Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: Factors, processes and outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(Suppl 1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parsell, G., & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Medical Education, 33, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Payler, J., Meyer, E., & Humphris, D. (2008). Pedagogy for interprofessional education—What do we know and how can we evaluate it? Learning in Health and Social Care, 7, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pollard, K. C., & Miers, M. E. (2008). From students to professionals: Results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pullon, S., & Fry, B. (2005). Interprofessional postgraduate education in primary health care: Is it making a difference? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pullon, S., McKinlay, E., Beckingsale, L., Perry, M., Darlow, B., Gray, B., et al. (2013). Interprofessional education for physiotherapy, medical and dietetics students: A pilot programme. Journal of Primary Health Care, 5, 52–58.Google Scholar
  33. Ravet, J. (2012). From interprofessional education to interprofessional practice: Exploring the implementation gap. Professional Development in Education, 38, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruebling, I., Pole, D., Breitbach, A. P., Frager, A., Kettenbach, G., Westhus, N., et al. (2013). A comparison of student attitudes and perceptions before and after an introductory interprofessional education experience. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheehan, D., Ormond, T., & Wyles, C. (2013). Collaborative practice and interprofessional education and workplace learning. In J. Higgs, D. Sheehan, J. B. Currens, W. Letts, & G. Jensen (Eds.), Realising exemplary practice-based education. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Steinert, Y. (2005). Learning together to teach together: Interprofessional education and faculty development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). Interprofessional education: A review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education, 46, 58–70.Google Scholar
  38. Wilhelmsson, M., Pelling, S., Ludvigsson, J., Hammar, J., Dahlgren, L.-O., & Faresjo, T. (2009). Twenty years experience of interprofessional education in Linkoping—Groundbreaking and sustainable. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin, R. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Pullon
    • 1
  • Ben Darlow
    • 1
  • Eileen McKinlay
    • 1
  1. 1.NewtownNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations