Conclusions

  • Ann-Marie Bathmaker
  • Jessie Abrahams
  • Richard Waller
  • Nicola Ingram
  • Anthony Hoare
  • Harriet Bradley
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

In the final chapter, we summarize the findings of the study and locate these in the wider policy context. The book shows that working-class students are not able to mobilize and exploit different forms of capital in the same ways as their highly resourced middle-class counterparts, and the book has shown how those processes work. Nevertheless, we argue that participation in HE provides working-class as well as middle-class students access to a wealth of opportunities, though these may be realized in the longer term rather than immediate futures. In addition, while HE has the potential to be game changing for working-class students, they may need greater resilience and resourcefulness to make HE work for them. There is an imperative for policymakers at national and institutional levels to recognize this and ensure that mechanisms are in place that enable rather than block the potential of working-class students.

The conclusions address key policy implications that need to be addressed to create structures and opportunities that support all students who form part of ‘the degree generation’, and do not implicitly maintain advantage for the middle classes.

Keywords

Social Mobility Downward Mobility Elite Institution Family Social Capital Russell Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atkinson, W., & Bradley, H. (2013). Ordinary lives: Class reproduction and everyday practice in contemporary Britain. ESRC Report.Google Scholar
  2. Bathmaker, A.-M. (2016). Higher education in further education: The challenges of providing a distinctive contribution that contributes to widening participation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, H. (2015, April). Aspirations and adaptations: Young people’s careers in the context of neoliberal policies. Paper presented at Journal of Youth Studies Conference, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, H. (2016). Fractured identities (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, P., & Scase, R. (1994). Higher education and corporate realities. London: University College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Corbyn, J. (2016). Speech to Unite Scottish Policy Conference on 16 January 2016. http://press.labour.org.uk/post/137421807299/jeremy-corbyns-speech-to-unite-policy-conference. Accessed Jan 2016.
  7. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2015). Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice, CM9141. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/higher-education-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice. Accessed Dec 2015.
  8. Dorling, D. (2014). Inequality and the 1%. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Edgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2014). Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, S. (2015). Habitus Clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. Sociological Review [online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-954X.12280/abstract. Accessed 14 May 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Gallacher, J. (2006). Widening access or differentiation and stratification in higher education in Scotland. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(4), 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higgins, S. (2015). What works in raising attainment and closing the gap: Research evidence from the UK and abroad. www.Educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk. Accessed Jan 2016.
  13. Ingram, N. (2009). Working-class boys, educational success and the misrecognition of working-class culture. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(4), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingram, N. (2011). Within school and beyond the gate: The difficulties of being educationally successful and working-class. Sociology, 45(7), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingram, N., & Abrahams, J. (2016). Stepping outside of oneself: How a cleft-habitus can lead to greater reflexivity through occupying “the third space”. In J. Thatcher, N. Ingram, C. Burke, & J. Abraham (Eds.), Bourdieu—The next generation: The development of Bourdieu’s intellectual heritage in contemporary UK sociology (pp. 140–156). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, O. (2014). The establishment: And how they get away with it. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  17. Khan, S. R. (2012). Privilege: The making of an Adolescent Elite at St Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lareau, A. (2011 [2003]). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nded.).London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lindley, J., & Machin, S. (2013). The postgraduate premium: Revisiting trends in social mobility and educational inequalities in Britain and America. London: Sutton Trust. http://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Postgraduate-Premium-Report.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015.
  21. MacanGhaill, M. (1988). Young, gifted and black. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Moodie, G. (2009). Four tiers. Higher Education, 58(3), 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nash, R. (2002). The educated habitus, progress at school and real knowledge. Interchange, 33(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reay, D. (1998). ‘Always knowing’ and ‘never being sure’: Familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Education Policy, 13(4), 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reay, D. (2002). Shaun’s story: Troubling discourses of white working-class masculinities. Gender and Education, 14(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reay, D. (2015). Habitus and the psychosocial: Bourdieu with feelings. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. (2005). Degrees of choice: Social class, race and gender in higher education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  29. Robertson, S. (in press). Piketty, capital and education: A solution to, or problem in, rising social inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, Special Issue on Piketty and Education. https://susanleerobertson.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/robertson-2015-piketty-education-solution-or-problem.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015.
  30. Sayer, A. (2005). Themoral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission (SMCP).(2014).State of the nation 2014 report. http://www.gov.uk/government/publications. Accessed July 2015.
  32. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  33. Stich, A. (2012). Access to inequality: Reconsidering class, knowledge, and capital in higher education. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  34. Timmis, S., Ching YeeW., & Chereau, C.M. (2014).Digital diversity, learning and belonging (DD-lab) overview and initial findings. Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol. https://digitaldiversitylab.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/dd-lab-overview-and-initial-findings.pdf. Accessed Jan 2016.

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Marie Bathmaker
    • 1
  • Jessie Abrahams
    • 2
  • Richard Waller
    • 3
  • Nicola Ingram
    • 4
  • Anthony Hoare
    • 5
  • Harriet Bradley
    • 6
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  3. 3.School of Education (S Block)University of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  4. 4.Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  5. 5.School of Geographical SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  6. 6.Faculty of Business and LawUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations