Advertisement

Learner Autonomy and Groups

  • David M. Palfreyman
Chapter

Abstract

Working in groups is a popular teaching strategy associated with communicative, task-based and other approaches in ELT. Learner autonomy has also become an influential concept and has been linked to groupwork. However, ideas about how learner autonomy (often seen as a set of skills in an individual) might develop through groupwork have tended to develop by practice and intuition more than through research. This chapter will consider some relevant questions about learner autonomy and groupwork, for example, individual autonomy in a group, learner support, autonomy development, group autonomy and conditions for group and individual autonomy. It will also discuss research approaches which have proved useful in other fields and how these might be applied in language learning and teaching contexts.

Keywords

Learner autonomy Group work Social autonomy Collaborative learning 

References

  1. Allen, N. J., & Hecht, T. D. (2004). The ‘romance of teams’: Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwright, D. (1990). Autonomy in language pedagogy. CRILE working paper 6. Centre for Research in Education, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Benson, P., & Cooker, L. (2013). The applied linguistic individual. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  6. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2013). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Boekaerts, M. (2011). What have we learned about the social context – Student engagement link? Teachers College Record, 113(2), 375–393.Google Scholar
  8. Boud, D. (Ed.). (1981). Developing student autonomy in learning (Vol. 12). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Carvalho, J. A. (2000). Knowledge needs of self-organized systems. In Y. Malhotra (Ed.), Knowledge management and virtual organizations (pp. 350–364). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, L. Y. H. (2007). The influences of group processes on learners’ autonomous beliefs and behaviors. System, 35(3), 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chik, A., & Breidbach, S. (2011). Online language learning histories exchange: Hong Kong and German perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cloward, R. D. (1967). Studies in tutoring. The Journal of Experimental Education, 36(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conner, J. O. (2009). Student engagement in an independent research project. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 8–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooker, L. (2013). “When I got a person to communicate with, I got a purpose to learn”: Evidence for social “modes of autonomy”. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.Google Scholar
  16. Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335116/Master_final_national_curriculum_220714.pdf
  17. Ding, F. (2015). Transition from mainland schools to an English-medium Hong Kong university: A longitudinal study of learner autonomy development. PhD thesis, Hong Kong Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Godin, S. (2010). It’s easier to teach compliance than initiative. Blog post. http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/02/its-easier-to-teach-compliance-than-initiative.html
  19. Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.Google Scholar
  21. Hammond, K., & Danaher, K. (2012). The value of targeted comic book readers. ELT Journal, 66(2), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heylighen, F. (1999). Collective intelligence and its implementation on the web: Algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(3), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howe, C. (2013). Scaffolding in context: Peer interaction and abstract learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.Google Scholar
  26. Jdaitawi, M. (2015). Social connectedness, academic, non-academic behaviors related to self-regulation among university students in Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 8(2), 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Impact of positive interdependence during electronic quizzes on discourse and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen, M. S. (1996). Cooperative quizzes in the anatomy and physiology laboratory: A description and evaluation. The American Journal of Physiology, 271(6 Pt 3), S48–S54.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.Google Scholar
  31. Kao, S.-H. (2011). Developing learner autonomy through peer teaching experiences. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 131–144). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kojima, H. (2012). Positive interdependence for teacher and learner autonomy: The case of the CARTA program. In K. Irie & A. Stewart (Eds.), Realizing autonomy: Practice and reflection in language education contexts (pp. 167–181). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Komissarouk, S., & Nadler, A. (2014). “I” seek autonomy, “we” rely on each other: Self-construal and regulatory focus as determinants of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help-seeking behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 726–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuchah, K., & Smith, R. (2011). Pedagogy of autonomy for difficult circumstances: From practice to principles. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamb, M. (2013). The struggle to belong: Individual language learners in situated learning theory. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 32–45). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  36. Lamb, M., & Smith, R. (2013). Posts in ‘autonomous language learning in developing countries’. [AUTO-L discussion list].Google Scholar
  37. Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory and the dialectics of L2 learner autonomy/agency. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 17–31). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  38. Lewis, T. (2014). Learner autonomy and the theory of sociality. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liang, X., Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2013). Peer assistance in an English immersion context in China. In L. Jin & M. Cortazzi (Eds.), Researching intercultural learning: Investigations in language and education (pp. 99–116). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Littlewood, W. (2002). Cooperative and collaborative learning tasks as pathways towards autonomous interdependence. In P. Benson & S. Toogood (Eds.), Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice (pp. 29–40). Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.Google Scholar
  43. Macaro, E. (2007). The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 47–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  44. Maylone, M. M., Ranieri, L., Quinn Griffin, M. T., McNulty, R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2011). Collaboration and autonomy: Perceptions among nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mideros, D., & Carter, B.-A. (2014). Meeting the autonomy challenge in an advanced Spanish listening class. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 135–151). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murray, G. (2014). Autonomy in language learning as a social construct. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 233–249). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. National Qualifications Authority. (2012). Qualifications framework emirates handbook. http://www.nqa.gov.ae/En/QFEmirates/QualificationsFramework
  51. O’Leary, C. (2014). Developing autonomous language learners in higher education: A social constructivist perspective. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 15–36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of second language learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 75–91). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palfreyman, D. M. (2014). The ecology of learner autonomy. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 175–191). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Panadero, E., Kirschner, P. A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichert, M., & Hawley, R. (2014). I can learn from you: Boys as relational learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, R. (2001). Group work for autonomy in Asia: Insights from teacher-research. In L. Dam (Ed.), Learner autonomy: New insights (pp. 70–81). Huddersfield, UK: AILA/Catchline.Google Scholar
  57. Tassinari, G. (2012). Dynamic autonomy model with descriptors. http://www.sprachenzentrum.fu-berlin.de/en/slz/lernberatung/autonomiemodell/index.html
  58. Tassinari, G. (2013). Learner autonomy and group work. AUTO-L discussion.Google Scholar
  59. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419–427.Google Scholar
  60. Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, A. Henry, & P. D. MacIntyre (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47–54). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  62. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink: Explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for investigating talk. In R. Wegerif & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and talk in the primary classroom (pp. 49–65). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  65. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, C. (2011). Inside independent learning: Old and new perspectives. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning (pp. 14–23). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wilkinson, R. (2010). Teaching for autonomy: What do the students think? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 23, 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xu, J. (2011). Homework emotion management at the secondary school level: Antecedents and homework completion. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 529–560.Google Scholar
  70. Yashima, T. (2014). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 60–77). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Palfreyman
    • 1
  1. 1.English and Writing Studies DepartmentZayed UniversityDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations