Advertisement

Biology, Social Science, and Population in Late Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Britain

  • Chris Renwick

Abstract

“Population” has been an important concept in both biology and social science for the past 150 years. However, few scholars have understood the developments in each field as connected. In this chapter, I explain how the emergence of population thinking in biology and social science in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Britain were related, with research at the intersection of the two fields helping to construct shared ideas and practices. As the chapter shows, eugenics looms large in that history.

References

  1. Abrams, Philip. 1968. The Origins of British Sociology: 1834–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, Slama Preveen. 1987. Institutions and the Growth of Knowledge: The Rockefeller Foundations’ Influence on the Social Sciences between the Wars. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  3. Angner, Erik. 2002. The History of Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, Naomi. 2012. Be Fruitful and Multiply: Growth, Reason and Cultural Group Selection in Hayek and Darwin. Biological Theory 6: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2016. The Spontaneous Market Order and Evolution. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler, Peter J. 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Box, Joan Fisher. 1978. R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Briggs, Asa. 1961. Social Thought and Social Action: A Study of the Work of Seebohm Rowntree, 1871–1954. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  9. Bulmer, Martin. 1985. The Development of Sociology and of Empirical Social Research in Britain. In Essays on the History of British Sociological Research, ed. Martin Bulmer, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr-Saunders, Alexander. 1926. Eugenics. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1935. Eugenics in the Light of Population Trends. Eugenics Review 27: 11–20.Google Scholar
  12. Carr-Saunders, Alexander, and David Caradog Jones. 1927. The Social Structure of England and Wales as Illustrated by Statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1937. The Social Structure of England and Wales as Illustrated by Statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carr-Saunders, Alexander, and P.A. Wilson. 1933. The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carr-Saunders, Alexander, David Caradog Jones, and C.A. Moser. 1958. A Survey of Social Conditions in England and Wales. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Charles, Enid. 1935. The Effect of Present Trends in Fertility and Mortality upon the Future Population of England and Wales and Upon its Age Composition. London and Cambridge Economic Service Special Memoranda, no. 40.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1936. The Menace of Under-Population: A Biological Study of the Decline of Population Growth. London: Watts & Co..Google Scholar
  18. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1995. LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1895–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Depew, Donald, and Bruce Weber. 1995. Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Erlingsson, Steindór Jóhann. 2009a. The Plymouth Laboratory and the Institutionalization of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s. Journal of the History of Biology 42: 151–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2009b. The Costs of Being a Restless Intellect: Julian Huxley’s Popular Scientific Career in the 1920s. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esposito, Maurizio. 2016. From Human Science to Biology: The Second Synthesis of Ronald Fisher. History of the Human Sciences 29: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, Ronald A. 1918. The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collége de France 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Galton, Francis. 1909. The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed Under Existing Conditions of Law and Sentiment. In Essays in Eugenics, ed. Francis Galton, 1–34. London: Eugenics Education Society.Google Scholar
  27. Gillham, Nicholas Wright. 2001. A Life of Sir Francis Galton: From African Exploration to the Birth of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Glass, David, ed. 1954a. Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1954b. Introduction. In Social Mobility in Britain, ed. David Glass, 3–28. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Goldthorpe, John H. 2016. Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1992. ‘Style’ for Historians and Philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayek, Friedrich. 1952. The Sensory Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1973. Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Vol. 1. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Hodge, M.J.S. 1992. Biology and Philosophy (Including Ideology): A Study of Fisher and Wright. In The Founders of Evolutionary Genetics: A Centenary Reappraisal, ed. S. Sarker, 231–293. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 1996. Origins and Species Before and After Darwin. In Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie, and M.J.S. Hodge, 374–395. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Hogben, Lancelot. 1931. Genetic Principles and Medicine and Social Science. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
  39. ———, ed. 1937. Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  41. Huxley, Julian, and A.C. Haddon. 1935. We Europeans: A Survey of ‘Racial Problems’. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, David Caradog, ed. 1934. The Social Survey of Merseyside. 3 Vols. London: University of Liverpool Press and Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  43. Kevles, Daniel J. 1984. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Keynes, John Maynard. 1919. Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1923. A Reply to Sir William Beveridge. The Economic Journal 33: 476–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lester, Joe. 1995. E. Ray Lankester and the Making of Modern British Biology., Edited by Peter J. Bowler. Oxford: British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
  49. MacKenzie, Donald. 1981. Statistics in Britain: The Social Construction of Scientific 1865–1930. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, its Sources and its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Oakley, Ann. 2014. Father and Daughter: Patriarchy, Gender, and Social Science. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osborne, Thomas, and Nikolas Rose. 2008. Populating Sociology: Carr-Saunders and the Problem of Population. The Sociological Review 56: 552–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearson, Karl, Alice Lee, and Leslie Bramley-Moore. 1899. Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. VI. Genetic (Reproductive) Selection. Inheritance of Fertility in Man, and of Fecundity in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 192: 257–330.Google Scholar
  56. Pick, Daniel. 1989. Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c.1848–c.1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Platt, Lucinda. 2014. Poverty Studies and Social Research. In The Palgrave Handbook of Sociology in Britain, ed. John Holmwood and John Scott, 30–53. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Porter, Theodore M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Provine, William B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Reisman, David. 2001. Richard Titmuss: Welfare and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Renwick, Chris. 2012. British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ———. 2014. Completing the Circle of the Social Sciences? William Beveridge and Social Biology at London School of Economics During the 1930s. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44: 478–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ———. 2016a. Eugenics, Population Research, and Social Mobility Studies in Early and Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain. The Historical Journal 59: 845–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ———. 2016b. New Bottles for New Wine: Julian Huxley, Biology, and Sociology in Britain. In Biosocial Matters: Sociology-Biology Relations in the Early Twenty-First Century, ed. Maurizio Meloni, Simon Williams, and Peter Martin, 151–167. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Rowntree, B.S. 1901. Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  66. Seim, David L. 2013. Rockefeller Philanthropy and Modern Social Science. London: Pickering and Chatto/Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Soloway, Richard A. 1990. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  68. Stedman-Jones, Daniel. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Szreter, Simon. 1996. Fertility, Class, and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tabery, James. 2014. Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Toye, John. 2000. Keynes on Population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. UNESCO. 1952. The Race Concept: Results of an Enquiry. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  73. Werskey, Gary. 1978. The Visible College: The Collective Biography of British Scientific Socialists of the 1930s. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Renwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations