Advertisement

Of Rats and Women: Narratives of Motherhood in Environmental Epigenetics

  • Martha Kenney
  • Ruth Müller

Abstract

Environmental epigenetics is the study of how environmental signals affect gene expression. Within this growing field, experiments on the effects of “maternal care” on offspring health have received much attention. In this chapter, we show how commonsense assumptions about sex, gender, sexuality and class are present in the design, interpretation and dissemination of these experiments. We show how claims about human motherhood are supported through a dense speculative cross-traffic between epigenetic studies in rodents and psychological and epidemiological studies in humans, and how research therefore tends to illustrate rather than interrogate existing stereotypes about maternal agency and responsibility. Consequently, we draw attention to the need to analyze the political dimensions of environmental epigenetics and to the potentials and challenges for (collaborative) biosocial knowledge production.

Notes

Acknowledgments

A first version of this paper was presented at the workshop ‘‘Epigenetics, Society & Gender’’ at the University of Vienna, June 22, 2012, organized by Sigrid Schmitz, Ruth Müller and Renee Schröder. We gratefully acknowledge the travel support for Martha Kenney that allowed us to start this project, and the inspiring discussions at the workshop. We would further like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editors atBioSocieties for their constructive comments that helped improve the article, as well as Martyn Pickersgill and Cornelia Schadler for their valuable feedback during the writing process. Finally we would like to thanks the editors of this volume for including us and to BioSocieties for allowing us to reprint the article.

References

  1. Altzinger, Wilfried, Nadja Lamei, Bernhard Rumplmaier, and Alyssa Schneebaum. 2013. Intergenerationelle soziale Mobilität in Österreich. Statistische Nachrichten 68 (1): 48–62.Google Scholar
  2. Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter Camacho, Adrian Mackenzie, and Paul Martin. 2015. Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science & Technology Studies 28 (3): 3–25.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, Jay, Laurence D. Steinberg, Renate M. Houts, Sarah L. Friedman, Ganie DeHart, Elizabeth Cauffman, Glenn I. Roisman, Bonnie L. Halpern-Felsher, and Elisabeth Susman. 2007. Family Rearing Antecedents of Pubertal Timing. Child Development 78 (4): 1302–1321. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boero, Natalie. 2009. Fat Kids, Working Moms, and the "Epidemic of Obesity": Race, Class, and Mother-Blame. In The Fat Studies Reader, ed. Esther Rothblum and Sondra Solovay, 113–120. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buchen, Lizzie. 2010. Neuroscience: In their Nurture. Nature 467 (7312): 146–148. doi: 10.1038/467146a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buffone, Sonya. 2012. Towards an Integrative Theory of Crime and Delinquency: Re-conceptualizing the Farrington Theory. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 5 (2): 895–911.Google Scholar
  7. Bukodi, Erzsébet, John H. Goldthorpe, Lorraine Waller, and Jouni Kuha. 2015. The Mobility Problem in Britain: New Findings from the Analysis of Birth Cohort Data. The British Journal of Sociology 66 (1): 93–117. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullard, Robert D. 2011. Confronting Environmental Racism in the 21st Century. In The Colors of Nature: Culture, Identity, and the Natural World, ed. Alison H. Deming and Lauret E. Savoy, 89-95. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
  9. Caldji, Christian, Josie Diorio, and Michael J. Meaney. 2000. Variations in Maternal Care in Infancy Regulate the Development of Stress Reactivity. Biological Psychiatry 48 (12): 1164–1174. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01084-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron, Nicole M., Dara Shahrokh, Adina Del Corpo, Sabine K. Dhir, Moshe Szyf, Frances A. Champagne, and Michael J. Meaney. 2008. Epigenetic Programming of Phenotypic Variations in Reproductive Strategies in the Rat through Maternal Care. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 20 (6): 795–801. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01725.
  11. Cameron, Nicole M., Frances A. Champagne, Carine Parent, Eric W. Fish, Kumi Ozaki-Kuroda, and Michael J. Meaney. 2005. The Programming of Individual Differences in Defensive Responses and Reproductive Strategies in the Rat through Variations in Maternal Care. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 29 (4–5): 843–865. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Champagne, Frances A., Darlene D. Francis, Adam Mar, and Michael J. Meaney. 2003. Variations in Maternal Care in the Rat as a Mediating Influence for the Effects of Environment on Development. Physiology & Behavior 79 (3): 359–371. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00149-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Champagne, Frances A., and Michael J. Meaney. 2006. Stress During Gestation Alters Postpartum Maternal Care and the Development of the Offspring in a Rodent Model. Biological Psychiatry 59 (12): 1227–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, Patricia Hill. 1999. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Darling, Katherine Weatherford, Sara L. Ackerman, Robert H. Hiatt, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, and Janet K. Shim. 2016. Enacting the Molecular Imperative: How Gene-environment Interaction Research Links Bodies and Environments in the Post-Genomic Age. Social Science & Medicine 155: 51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, Angela Y. 1990. Women, Culture & Politics. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Farrington, David P., Bernard Gallagher, Lynda Morley, Raymond J. St Ledger, and Donald J. West. 1988. Are there Any Successful Men from Criminogenic Backgrounds? Psychiatry 51 (2): 116–130. doi:  10.1080/00332747.1988.11024387.
  18. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, Cordelia. 2010. Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, Des, and Felicity Callard. 2015. Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32 (1): 3–32. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, Des, Nikolas Rose, and Ilina Singh. 2014. Urban Life and Mental Health: Re-visiting Politics, Society and Biology. Accessed 15 February 2016. http://discoversociety.org/2014/02/15/urban-life-and-mental-health-re-visiting-politics-society-and-biology/.Google Scholar
  22. Fleck, Ludwik. 1979 (1935). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fox Keller, Evelyn. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1995. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gluckman, Peter D., Mark A. Hanson, Tatjana Buklijas, Felicia M. Low, and Alan S. Beedle. 2009. Epigenetic Mechanisms that Underpin Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 5 (7): 401–408. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haapasalo, Jaana, and Richard E. Tremblay. 1994. Physically Aggressive Boys from Ages 6 to 12: Family Background, Parenting Behavior, and Prediction of Delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62 (5): 1044–1052.Google Scholar
  27. Haraway, Donna J. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Vol. 30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hedlund, Maria. 2012. Epigenetic Responsibility. Medicine Studies 3 (3): 171–183. doi: 10.1007/s12376-011-0072-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubbard, Ruth. 1979. Have Only Men Evolved? In Women Look at Biology Looking at Women, ed. Barbara Fried, Ruth Hubbard, and Mary Sue Henifin, 7-35. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  32. Kuzawa, Christopher W., and Elizabeth Sweet. 2009. Epigenetics and the Embodiment of Race: Developmental Origins of US Racial Disparities in Cardiovascular Health. American Journal of Human Biology 21 (1): 2–15. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landecker, Hannah. 2011. Food as Exposure: Nutritional Epigenetics and the New Metabolism. BioSocieties 6 (2): 167–194. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2011.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landecker, Hannah, and Aaron Panofsky. 2013. From Social Structure to Gene Regulation, and Back: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Epigenetics for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 39 (1): 333–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loi, Michele, Lorenzo Del Savio, and Elia Stupka. 2013. Social Epigenetics and Equality of Opportunity. Public Health Ethics 6 (2): 142–153. doi: 10.1093/phe/pht019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maher, JaneMaree, Suzanne Fraser, and Jan Wright. 2010. Framing the Mother: Childhood Obesity, Maternal Responsibility and Care. Journal of Gender Studies 19 (3): 233–247. doi: 10.1080/09589231003696037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mansfield, Becky. 2012. Race and the New Epigenetic Biopolitics of Environmental Health. BioSocieties 7 (4): 352–372. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGowan, Patrick O., and Moshe Szyf. 2010. The Epigenetics of Social Adversity in Early Life: Implications for Mental Health Outcomes. Neurobiology of Disease 39 (1): 66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.12.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meaney, Michael J. 2001. Maternal Care, Gene Expression, and the Transmission of Individual Differences in Stress Reactivity Across Generations. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (1): 1161–1192. doi:  10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1161.
  40. ———. 2004. The Nature of Nurture: Maternal Effects and Chromatin Remodeling. In Essays in Social Neuroscience, ed. John T. Cacioppo and Gary G. Berntson, 1–14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2010. Epigenetics and the Biological Definition of Gene × Environment Interactions. Child Development 81 (1): 41–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meaney, Michael J., Michael L. Liebowitz, and E. David Leonardo. 2015. Neurobiology of Anxiety Disorders. In Psychiatry, ed. Allan Tasman, Jerald Kay, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, Michael B. First, and Michelle Riba, 320–340. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  43. Meaney, Michael J., Moshe Szyf, and Jonathan R. Seckl. 2007. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Perinatal Programming of Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal Function and Health. Trends in Molecular Medicine 13 (7): 269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meloni, Maurizio. 2013. Biology without Biologism: Social Theory in a Postgenomic Age. Sociology 48 (4): 731–746. doi: 10.1177/0038038513501944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2015. Epigenetics for the Social Sciences: Justice, Embodiment, and Inheritance in the Postgenomic Age. New Genetics and Society 34 (2): 125–151. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1034850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meloni, Maurizio, and Giuseppe Testa. 2014. Scrutinizing the Epigenetics Revolution. BioSocieties 9 (4): 431–456. doi:  10.1057/biosoc.2014.22.
  47. Moynihan, Daniel P. 1965. The Negro Family: The Case For National Action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research. United States Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  48. Müller, Ruth. 2014. Racing for What? Anticipation and Acceleration in the Work and Career Practices of Academic Life Science Postdocs. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15 (3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1403150.
  49. ———. Forthcoming. Biological Determinism in the Age of Epigenetics: From Genetic to Environmental. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  50. Nguyen, Huy-Bin, Rosemary C. Bagot, Josie Diorio, Tak P. Wong, and Michael J. Meaney. 2015. Maternal Care Differentially Affects Neuronal Excitability and Synaptic Plasticity in the Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology 40 (7): 1590–1599. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niewöhner, Jörg. 2011. Epigenetics: Embedded Bodies and the Molecularisation of Biography and Milieu. BioSocieties 6 (3): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2015. Epigenetics: Localizing Biology through Co-laboration. New Genetics and Society 34 (2): 219–242. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1036154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oudshoorn, Nelly. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickersgill, Martyn. 2014. Neuroscience, Epigenetics and the Intergenerational Transmission of Social Life: Exploring Expectations and Engagements. Families, Relationships and Societies 3 (3): 481–484. doi: 10.1332/204674314x14110461422823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pickersgill, Martyn, Jörg Niewohner, Ruth Müller, Paul Martin, and Sarah Cunningham-Burley. 2013. Mapping the New Molecular Landscape: Social Dimensions of Epigenetics. New Genetics and Society 32 (4): 429–447. doi:  10.1080/14636778.2013.861739.
  56. Pickersgill, Martyn. 2016. Epistemic Modesty, Ostentatiousness and the Uncertainties of Epigenetics: On the Knowledge Machinery of (Social) Science. The Sociological Review Monographs 64 (1): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2011. Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things. Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. doi: 10.1177/0306312710380301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reardon, Jenny, Jacob Metcalf, Martha Kenney, and Karen Barad. 2015. Science & Justice: The Trouble and the Promise. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 1 (1): http://catalystjournal.org/ojs/index.php/catalyst/article/view/reardon_metcalf_kenney_barad.Google Scholar
  59. Reardon, Sara. 2015. Poverty Shrinks Brains from Birth. Nature News. Accessed 13 January 2016. doi: 10.1038/nature.2015.17227.
  60. Rice, Stanley. 2007. The Encyclopedia of Evolution. New York: Facts On File.Google Scholar
  61. Richardson, Sarah S. 2013. Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ———. 2015. Maternal Bodies in the Postgenomic Order: Gender and the Explanatory Landscape of Epigenetics. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome, ed. Sarah S. Richardson and Hallam Stevens. Durham, 210-231. NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Richardson, Sarah S., Cynthia R. Daniels, Matthew W. Gillman, Janet Golden, Rebecca Kukla, Christopher Kuzawa, and Janet Rich-Edwards. 2014. Don’t Blame the Mothers. Nature 512: 131–132. doi:  10.1038/512131a.
  64. Roberts, Dorothy E. 1997. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  65. Rose, Nikolas. 2013. The Human Sciences in a Biological Age. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (1): 3–34. doi: 10.1177/0263276412456569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rose, Steven. 2009. Darwin 200: Should Scientists Study Race and IQ? Nature 457 (7231): 786–788. doi:  10.1038/457786a.
  67. Roughgarden, Joan. 2004. Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 2009. The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schiebinger, Londa. 1993. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Singh, Ilina. 2012. Human Development, Nature and Nurture: Working Beyond the Divide. BioSocieties 7 (3): 308–321. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spade, Dean. 2011. Laws As Tactics. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 21 (2): 40–71.Google Scholar
  72. Stern, Alexandra. 2015. Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America. 2nd ed., American Crossroads. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  73. Stotz, Karola, and Paul E. Griffiths. 2008. Biohumanities: Rethinking the Relationship between Biosciences, Philosophy and History of Science, and Society. The Quarterly Review of Biology 83 (1): 37–45. doi:  10.1086/529561.
  74. Szyf, Moshe, Ian C.G. Weaver, Francis A. Champagne, Josie Diorio, and Michael J. Meaney. 2005. Maternal Programming of Steroid Receptor Expression and Phenotype Through DNA Methylation in the Rat. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 26 (3–4): 139–162. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vicedo, Marga. 2013. The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Viseu, Ana. 2015. Caring for Nanotechnology? Being an Integrated Social Scientist. Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 642–664. doi: 10.1177/0306312715598666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weaver, Ian C.G., Nadia Cervoni, Frances A. Champagne, Ana C. D’Alessio, Shakti Sharma, Jonathan R. Seckl, Sergiy Dymov, Moshe Szyf, and Michael J. Meaney. 2004. Epigenetic Programming By Maternal Behavior. Nature Neuroscience 7 (8): 847–854. doi: 10.1038/nn1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wells, Jonathan C. 2010. Maternal Capital and the Metabolic Ghetto: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Transgenerational Basis of Health Inequalities. American Journal of Human Biology 22 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang, Tie-Yuan, Rose Bagot, Carine Parent, Cathy Nesbitt, Timothy W. Bredy, Christian Caldji, Eric Fish, Hymie Anisman, Moshe Szyf, and Michael J. Meaney. 2006. Maternal Programming of Defensive Responses through Sustained Effects on Gene Expression. Biological Psychology 73 (1): 72–89. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang, Tie-Yuan, Parent Carine, Ian Weaver, and Michael J. Meaney. 2004. Maternal Programming of Individual Differences in Defensive Responses in the Rat. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1032 (1): 85–103. doi:  10.1196/annals.1314.007.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha Kenney
    • 1
  • Ruth Müller
    • 2
  1. 1.Technical University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.San Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations