Advertisement

The Postgenomic Politics of Race

  • Catherine Bliss

Abstract

In this chapter I reflect on new trends in racial politics in the postgenomic age. I highlight the ways in which struggles over the characterization of race and the amelioration of racial inequality have come to be a driver of large-scale global research programs and science activism has come to stand in for mass activism. Drawing on the analysis of in-depth interviews with genomic elites and content analysis of the body of literature on race and genomics published from 1986–2010, I show how scientists take on the banner of racial activism but ultimately fail to bring about a politics that can aid and abet mass movements. Instead, these postgenomic developments reinscribe a deterministic understanding of race, one that supports racial essentialism and inequality.

References

  1. (FDA), Food & Drug Administration. 1998. Investigational New Drug Applications and New Drug Applications.Google Scholar
  2. (HHS), U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. The National Human Genome Research Institute Strategic Plan for Reducing Health Disparities: Fiscal Years 2002–2006. www.nimhd.nih.gov/our…/strategic/pubs/volumei_031003edrev.pdf.
  3. (NHGRI), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2001. Conference about the HGP for Minority Communities. http://www.genome.gov/10003008.
  4. ———), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2002. About NHGRI’s Minority Action Plan. http://www.genome.gov/14514228.
  5. ———), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2003. May 2003 NACHGR Meeting Summary. Natcher Conference Center Bethesda, MD. http://www.genome.gov/11008855.
  6. ———), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2004. NHGRI/NIH Health Disparities Strategic Plan (2004-2008).Google Scholar
  7. ———), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2012a. Community Genetics Forum. Community Genetics Forum. http://www.genome.gov/19518473
  8. ———), National Human Genome Research Institute. 2012b. ELSI Research: New Goals for the Next 5 Years. http://www.genome.gov/10002229.
  9. (NIH), National Institutes of Health. 1993. The NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Vol. PL 103–43).Google Scholar
  10. ———), National Institutes of Health. 2000. NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-048.html.
  11. ———), National Institutes of Health. 2010, June 22. NIH and Wellcome Trust Announce Partnership To Support Population-based Genome Studies in Africa, June 22, 2010 News Release - National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH News. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jun2010/nhgri-22.htm.
  12. (OMB), Office of Management and Budget 1997. Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity | The White House (Federal Register Notice). http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards.
  13. Angier, Natalie. 2000. Do Races Differ? Not Really, Genes Show. New York Times. Google Scholar
  14. Bamshad, Michael J., Stephen Wooding, W. Scott Watkins, Christopher T. Ostler, Mark A. Batzer, and Lynn B. Jorde. 2003. Human Population Genetic Structure and Inference of Group Membership. American Journal of Human Genetics 72 (3): 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartlett, Karen. 2009. Hard to Swallow: Race-based Medicine. Wired UK. http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2009/11/features/hard-to-swallow-race-based-medicine.
  16. Benjamin, Ruha. 2013. People’s Science Bodies and Rights on the Stem Cell Frontier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bliss, Catherine. 2011. Racial Taxonomy in Genomics. Social Science & Medicine 73 (7): 1019–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2012. Race Decoded: The Genomic Fight for Social Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2015. Defining Health Justice in the Postgenomic Era. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology After the Genome, ed. Sarah S. Richardson and Hallam Stevens. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Burchard, Esteban G. 2014. Medical Research: Missing Patients. Nature 513 (7518): 301–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Braun, Lundy. 2002. Race, Ethnicity, and Health: Can Genetics Explain Disparities? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (2): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, Phil, Rachel Morello-Frosch, and Steven Zavestoski. 2012. Contested Illnesses. Stanford, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. CBS News. 2003, February 28. DNA “Testing for Sale.” CBS. http://www.cbs.com/DNA+Testing+for+Sale
  24. Chandler, David L. 2001, May 10. Heredity Study Eyes European Origins. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-8655716.html.
  25. Charmaz, Karen. 2005. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cheng, Keith C., and Victor A. Canfield. 2006. The Role of SLC24A5 in Skin Color. Experimental Dermatology 15 (10): 836–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chow-White, Peter. 2008. The Informationalization of Race: Communication Technologies and the Human Genome in the Digital Age. International Journal of Communication, 2. http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/221.
  28. Chow-White, Peter A., and Troy Duster. 2011. Do Health and Forensic DNA Databases Increase Racial Disparities? PLoS Med 8 (10): e1001100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clarke, Adele, Fosket Fishman, R. Jennifer, Laura Mamo, and Janet K. Shim. 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the US. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. CNN Live at Daybreak. 2001, May 3. Should Doctors Consider Skin Color When Prescribing Drugs. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/Should+Doctors+Consider+Skin+Color+When+Prescribing+Drugs
  31. Collins, Harry, and R. Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cooper, K. J. 2011. People of Color Needed for Important Genetic Research. America’s Wire. http://americaswire.org/drupal7/?q=content/people-color-needed-important-genetic-research.
  33. Duke, David. 1998. My Awakening: A Path to Racial Understanding. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Duster, Troy. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2006. The Molecular Reinscription of Race: Unanticipated Issues in Biotechnology and Forensic Science. Patterns of Prejudice 40 (4–5): 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. El-Haj, Nadia A. 2007. The Genetic Reinscription of Race. Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (1): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Epstein, Steven. 2007. Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. In Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. European Society of Human Genetics. 2010, June 11. Understanding Genetic Mixing through Migration: A Tool for Clinicians as Well as Genealogists. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100611204144.htm.
  39. Evans, Patrick D., Sandra Gilbert, Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov, Eric Vallender, Jeffrey Anderson, Leila Vaez-Azizi, Sarah A. Tishkoff, et al. 2005. Microcephalin, a Gene Regulating Brain Size, Continues to Evolve Adaptively in Humans. Science 309 (5741): 1717–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fujimura, Joan H., and Ramya Rajagopalan. 2011. Different Differences: The Use of “genetic Ancestry” Versus Race in Biomedical Human Genetic Research. Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fullwiley, Duana. 2008. The biologistical construction of race: “Admixture” technology and the new genetic medicine. Social Studies of Science 38 (5): 695–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2001. Racism and Human Genome Diversity Research: The Ethical Limits of ‘Population Thinking. Philosophy of Science 68: S479–S492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. GenoCommunity. 2010. GenoCommunity Think Tank. http://www.genocommunity.org.
  44. Genographic Project. 2012. The Genographic Legacy Fund Grants - The Genographic Project - National Geographic. The Genographic Legacy Fund. https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/legacy_fund.html.
  45. Goldstein, David B., and Willard, Huntington. 2005, January 17. Race, the genome. Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/01/17/race_the_genome.
  46. Goldstein, David B., and Joel N. Hirschhorn. 2004. In Genetic Control of Disease, Does “Race” Matter? Nature Genetics 36 (12): 1243–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goldstein, Avram, and Weiss, Rick. 2003. Howard U. Plans Genetics Database. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A46122-2003May27?language=printer.
  48. H3Africa. 2012. High-Level Principles on Ethics, Governance and Resource Sharing. http://h3africa.org.
  49. Hayes, Veronica. 2011. Indigenous Genomics. Science 332 (6030): 639–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Henig, Robin M. 2004, October 10. The Genome in Black and White (and Gray). The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/10/magazine/10GENETIC.html.
  51. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2011. Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kahn, Jonathan. 2012. Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in a Post-genomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ———. 2011. Mandating Race: How the USPTO is Forcing Race into Biotech Patents. Nature Biotechnology 29 (5): 401–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinchy, Abby J. 2006. On the Borders of Post-war Ecology: Struggles Over the Ecological Society of America’s Preservation Committee, 1917–1946. Science as Culture 15 (1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Knight, Danielle. 1997. Gene Project Deemed Unethical. http://ipsnews.net/print.asp?idnews=67257.
  57. Litt, Iris F. 2001. When Race Matters. Journal of Adolescent Health 29 (5): 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Manica, Andrea, Franck Prugnolle, and Francois Balloux. 2005. Geography is a Better Determinant of Human Genetic Differentiation than Ethnicity. Human Genetics 118 (3): 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marks, Jonathan. 2002. What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and their Genes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Montoya, Michael J. 2011. Making the Mexican Diabetic: Race, Science, and the Genetics of Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Moore, Kelly, Daniel L. Kleinman, David Hess, and Scott Frickel. 2011. Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach. Theory and Society 40 (5): 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee. 2004. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nelkin, Dorothy, and Laurence R. Tancredi. 1994. Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nelson, Alondra. 2008. Bio Science: Genetic Genealogy Testing and the Pursuit of African Ancestry. Social Studies of Science (Sage) 38 (5): 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 2011. Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight against Medical Discrimination. Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. ———. 2015. The Social Life of DNA. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Science Friday. 2010, January 15. Is There A Biological Basis For Race? NPR. http://m.npr.org/news/Science/122620064.
  69. Phimister, Elizabeth G. 2003. Medicine and the Racial Divide. The New England Journal of Medicine 348 (12): 1081–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Timpson, Nicholas, Jon Heron, George Davey Smith, and Wolfgang Enard. 2007. Comment on papers by Evans et al. and Mekel-Bobrov et al. on evidence for positive selection of MCPH1 and ASPM. Science 317 (5841): 1036.Google Scholar
  71. The Tavis Smiley Show. 2009. The Medicalization of Race. PRI. http://www.tavissmileyradio.com/guests09/121809/Medicalization.html.
  72. Reardon, Jenny. 2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. In-formation series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Richardson, Sarah. 2011. Race and IQ in the Postgenomic Age: The Microcephaly Case. Biosocieties 6: 420–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Risch, Neil, Esteban Burchard, Elad Ziv, and Hua Tang. 2002. Categorization of Humans in Biomedical Research: Genes, Race and Disease. Genome Biology 3 (7).Google Scholar
  75. Roberts, Dorothy. 2008. Is race-based medicine good for us?: African American approaches to race, biomedicine, and equality. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (3): 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. ———. 2011. Fatal invention: how science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. New Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The politics of life itself : biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosenberg, Noah A., Jonathan K. Pritchard, J.L. Weber, Howard M. Cann, Kenneth K. Kidd, Lev A. Zhivotovsky, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2002. Genetic Structure of Human Populations. Science 298 (5602): 2381–2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rotimi, Charles N., and Lynn B. Jorde. 2010. Ancestry and disease in the age of genomic medicine. The New England journal of medicine 363 (16): 1551–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schwartz, Robert S. 2001. Racial profiling in medical research. N Engl J Med 344 (18): 1392–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singer, Elizabeth 2009. Beyond Race-Based Medicine - Technology Review. Technology Review. http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/21972.Google Scholar
  82. Stolberg, Sheryl G. (2001, May 13). The World: Skin Deep; Shouldn’t a Pill Be Colorblind? The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/13/weekinreview/the-world-skin-deep-shouldn-t-a-pill-be-colorblind.html.
  83. Tang, Hua, Tom Quertermous, Beatriz Rodriguez, Sharon L.R. Kardia, X. Zhu, Andrew Brown, J. Shaofeng Pankow, et al. 2005. Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 76 (2): 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. UNESCO. 1995. “Bioethics and Human Population Genetics Research.”Google Scholar
  85. Winant, Howard. 2004. Race and racism: Towards a global future. Ethnic & Racial Studies 29 (5): 986–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Winker, Margaret. 2008, April 24. What’s the Use of Race? Cambridge, MA: MIT conference.Google Scholar
  87. Wood, Alistair J. 2001. Racial Differences in the Response to Drugs–Pointers to Genetic Differences. N Engl J Med 344 (18): 1394–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woods, Roger P., Nelson B. Freimer, Joseph A. De Young, Scott C. Fears, Nancy L. Sicotte, Susan K. Service, Daniel J. Valentino, et al. 2006. Normal Variants of Microcephalin and ASPM Do Not Account for Brain Size Variability. Human Molecular Genetics 15 (12): 2025–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wright, Susan. 1994. Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering, 1972-1982. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  90. Yu, Fuli, Hill, R. Sean, Schaffner, Steven F., Sabeti, Pardis C., Wang, Eric, Mignault, Andre, Ferland, Russell, et al. 2007. Comment on “Ongoing Adaptive Evolution of ASPM, a Brain Size Determinant in Homo Sapiens.” Science, 316(5823), 370–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Bliss
    • 1
  1. 1.UCSFSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations