Advertisement

Bioethnography: A How-To Guide for the Twenty-First Century

  • Elizabeth F. S. Roberts
  • Camilo Sanz

Abstract

This chapter describes our efforts to develop what we call “bioethnography,” a research platform that combines ethnographic and biological data to arrive at better understandings of the histories and life circumstances that shape health and inequality. This platform is made possible through our collaboration with environmental health scientists involved in a longitudinal, pregnancy-birth-cohort and chemical exposure study in Mexico City. Bioethnography is a slow process due to the epistemic, temporal and logistical coordination of disparate and differently positioned intellectual research ecologies. To illuminate these efforts, we reflect on key issues and challenges that have arisen so far within three specific investigations within the larger collaboration (neighborhood dynamics, sleeping and eating), to provide a preliminary guide for social scientists contemplating similar bioethnographic projects.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Abundant thanks to Maurizio Meloni for providing us with the opportunity to gather our thoughts about bioethnography; Des Fitzgerald for an engaged set of critical comments about the original manuscript; the ELEMENT team, and especially Ana Benito, Jackie Goodrich, Adriana Mercado, Belinda Needham, Karen Petersen, Brisa Sanchez, Howard Hu, Luis Bautista Arredondo, Alejandra Cantoral, Linda Luna, Beti Escobedo, Bekki Tutino, Angeles Martinez Mier, Martha M. Téllez-Rojo, Erica Jansen and Deborah Watkins for conversations, meetings and guidance through this process. Martha M. Téllez-Rojo and Karen Petersen in particular for being such wise co-visionaries in making bioethnography happen. ELEMENT project coordinator Robin Lee and database managers Maritsa Solano and Lu Tang for their endless patience. ATLAS.ti staff, program specialists Susanne Friese and Ricardo Contreras for their expertise and willingness to guide us throughout the coding endeavor, and ATLAS.ti account manager Eve Weiss; Hannah Marcovitch and Erica Jensen for their dynamic experimentation with bioethnography and eating in Mexico City; the families in Colonia Periférico and Buena Vista who gave us the time and space to embark on todologia in accompaniment with them; Dean Hubbs for extensive editing and in-depth, iterative conversations that forced us to articulate our arguments more clearly and elegantly; the University of Michigan Department of Anthropology at Michigan, especially Andrew Shryock and Amy Rundquist for finding us lab space; and to all the students in our Mexican Exposures lab for figuring out with us how to do this very complicated thing; Faith Cole, Emily Hogan, Lauren Lund, Shiv Sharma, Kate Vogel, Raquelle Sewell, Kelsey Merritt, Kaavya Puttagunta, Hailey Briscoe, Clara Cullen, Sophie Geyer, Alexandria Choi, Sahar Gowani, and Hannah Marcovitch.

References

  1. Afeiche, Myriam, Karen E. Peterson, Brisa N. Sanchez, David Cantonwine, Hector Lamadria-Figueroa, Lourdes Schnass, Adrienne Ettinger, Maurico Hernandez-Avila, Howard Hu, and Martha M. Tellez-Rojo. 2011. Prenatal Lead Exposure and Weight of 0- to 5-Year old Children in Mexico City. Environmental Health Perspectives 19 (10): 1436–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs 18 (3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen Michelle. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beall, Cynthia M. 2006. Andean, Tibet, and Ethiopian Patterns of Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia. Journal of Integrative and Comparative Biology 46 (1): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brabec, Marek, Ricardo Godoy, Victoria Reyes-García, and William R. Leonard. 2007. BMI, Income, and Social Capital in a Native Amazonian Society: Interaction between Relative and Community Variables. American Journal of Human Biology 19 (4): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buysse, D. 2013. Sleep Health: Can We Define it? Does it Matter? Sleep 37 (1): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callard, Felicity, and Des Fitzgerald. 2015. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Science and Neurosciences. New York: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel. 1989. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief, ed. J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Camey, C., D. Buysse, S. Ancoli-Israel, A. Ednger, J. Krystal, K. Lichstein, and C. Morin. 2012. The Consensus Sleep Diary: Standardizing Prospective Sleep Self-Monitoring. Sleep 35 (2): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumit, Joseph. 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ekirch, Roger. 2006. At Day’s Close: Night in Times Past. New York: Norton and Company Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, Joseph, and Jim Trostle. 2013. EcoDess: Environmental Change and Diarrheal Disease: A Natural Experiment. Accessed 15 December 2016. https://sph.umich.edu/scr/ecodess/home.php?itemID=0&lang=English
  14. Ettinger, A.S., H. Lamadrid-Figueroa, M.M. Tellez-Rojo, A. Mercado-Garcia, K.E. Peterson, J. Schwartz, H. Hu, and M. Hernandez-Avila. 2009. Effect of Calcium Supplementation on Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial. Environ Health Perspect 117 (1): 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hadley, C., A. Brewis, and I. Pike. 2010. Does Less Autonomy Erode Women’s Health? Yes. No. Maybe. American Journal of Human Biology 22 (1): 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpern, Orit. 2015. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason Since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoevenaar-Blom, M., A. Spijkerman, D. Kromhout, J. Van der Verg, and M. Verschuren. 2011. Sleep Duration and Sleep Quality in Relation to 12-Year Cardiovascular Disease Incidence: The MORGEN Study. Sleep 34 (11): 1487–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, Steven, David Ribes, Ayse Buyuktur, and Geoffroy Bowker. 2011. Collaborative Rhythm: Temporal Dissonance and Alignment in Collaborative Scientific Work. CSCW: 19–23.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, Casper B. 2007. Infrastructural Fractals: Revisiting the Micro-Macro Distinction in Social Theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25: 832–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio. 2003. Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-twentieth-century Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Knorr-Cetina, Karen. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Koslofsky, Craig. 2011. Evening’s Empire: A History of the Night in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2004. How to Talk about the Body: The Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body and Society 10 (2/3): 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lind, David, and Elizabeth Barham. 2004. The Social Life of the Tortilla. Agriculture and Human Values 21: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindstrom, D., T. Belachew, C. Hadley, Dennis Hogan, and Fasil Tessema. 2011. Nonmarital Sex and Condom Knowledge among Ethiopian Young People: Improved Estimates Using a Nonverbal Response Card. Studies in Family Planning 1 (4): 251–262.Google Scholar
  29. Lock, Margaret. 2013. The Epigenome and Nature/Nurture Reunification: A Challenge for Anthropology Medical. Anthropology 32: 291–308.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, John H., and Scott E. Page. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts, Elizabeth F.S. 2015a. Bio-Ethnography: A Collaborative Methodological Experiment in Mexico City. In Somatosphere. http://somatosphere.net/2015/02/bio-ethnography.html. Date accessed December 4, 2016.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2015b. Food is Love: And so, What Then? BioSocieties 10: 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2017 “Exposure.” Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, June 28, 2017. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1152-exposure, Date Accessed August 28, 2017. Google Scholar
  35. Sanz, Camilo. 2017. Out of Sync Cancer Care: Health Insurance Companies, Biomedical Practices and Clinical Time in Colombia. Medical Anthropology 36: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stengers, Isabelle. 2005. The Cosmopolitical Proposal. In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel, 994–1003. Cambridge, MA. [Karlsruhe, Germany]: MIT Press; ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2010. Cosmopolitics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  38. Strathern, Marilyn. 1991. Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2004. Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxford: Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Tamayo y Ortiz, M., M.M. Téllez-Rojo, H. Hu, M. Hernández-Ávila, R. Wright, C. Amarasiriwardena, N. Lupoli, A. Mercado-García, I. Pantic, and H. Lamadrid-Figueroa. 2016. Lead in Candy Consumed and Blood Lead Levels of Children Living in Mexico City. Environmental Research 147: 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tellez-Rojo, M.M., A. Cantoral, D.E. Cantonwine, L. Schnaas, K. Peterson, H. Hu, and J.D. Meeker. 2013. Prenatal Urinary Phthalate Metabolites Levels and Neurodevelopment in Children at Two and Three Years of Age. Science of the Total Environment 461–462: 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiley, Andrea S. 2008. “Drink Milk for Fitness”: The Cultural Politics of Human Biological Variation and Milk Consumption in the United States. American Anthropologist 106 (3): 506–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, Simon. 2005. Sleep and Society: Sociological Ventures into the (Un)known. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2011. The Politics of Sleep: Governing (Un)consciousness in the Late Modern Age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolf-Meyer, Matthew. 2012. The Slumbering Masses: Sleep Medicine and Modern American Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wright, Jan, and Valerie Harwood. 2009. Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth F. S. Roberts
    • 1
  • Camilo Sanz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.University of IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations