Advertisement

Reforming Local Governments in Times of Crisis: Values and Expectations of Good Local Governance in Comparative Perspective

  • Bas Denters
  • Andreas Ladner
  • Poul Erik Mouritzen
  • Lawrence E. Rose
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

A lot has been written about normative and theoretical expectations of local government. In this chapter we give the word to the citizens. How satisfied are they with the way local democracy works in their municipality and what do they expect from their municipalities in terms of facilities and services? With the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, and Switzerland, our study covers four relatively well-off countries holding top positions in most overall assessments of democracy. We start with a general evaluation of the citizens’ satisfaction with their life in their municipality. In a next step we address the different ideas citizens have about the very essence of local democracy and local governance. The chapter ends with a discussion of varying degrees of satisfaction considering the different expectations.

Keywords

Local Government Direct Democracy Normative Expectation Representative Democracy Functional Consideration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Laura Bloomberg. 2014. Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review 74(4): 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dahl, R.A., and E.R. Tufte. 1973. Size and democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denters, Bas. 2014. Beyond ‘What do I get?’ functional and procedural sources of Dutch citizens’ satisfaction with local democracy. Urban Research & Practice 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2014.910921
  5. Denters, Bas, Oscar Gabriel, and Lawrence E. Rose. 2011. Citizens’ views about good local governance. In How democracy works: Political representation and policy congruence in modern societies, ed. M. Rosema, B. Denters, and K. Aarts. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Denters, Bas, Goldsmith Mike, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen, and Lawrence E. Rose. 2014. Size and local democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pennock, J. Roland. 1979. Democratic political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Sabine, G.H. 1952. The two democratic traditions. The Philosophical Review 61: 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Subramaniam, Surain. 2001. The dual narrative of “Good Governance”: Lessons for understanding political and cultural change in Malaysia and Singapore. Contemporary Southeast Asia 23(1): 65–80. doi: 10.2307/25798528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomassen, J. 1995. Support for democratic values. In Citizens and the state, ed. H.D. Klingemann and D. Fuchs, 383–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bas Denters
    • 1
  • Andreas Ladner
    • 2
  • Poul Erik Mouritzen
    • 3
  • Lawrence E. Rose
    • 4
  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of LausanneLausanneFrance
  3. 3.University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations