Advertisement

Local Democratic Renewal by Deliberative Participatory Instruments: Participatory Budgeting in Comparative Study

  • Norbert Kersting
  • Jana Gasparikova
  • Angel Iglesias
  • Jelizaveta Krenjova
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

Since the 1990s there has been a trend towards more dialogue-oriented political participation—a “deliberative turn,” in the phrase of Dryzek (2003). Deliberative dialogical democracy often develops a path to come from conflict to consensual deliberative decision making. Deliberative instruments were positively influenced by local agenda processes in the 1990s. In the new millennium participatory instruments such as participatory budgeting have spread all over Europe. What kind of instruments are implemented? Who are the key actors? Who is included and who is excluded? Are these instruments enhancing legitimacy and are they able to channel growing political protest? In four systematically analyzed case studies from Estonia, Slovakia, Spain, and Germany different types become apparent.

Keywords

Political Participation Deliberative Democracy Open Forum Local Agendum Civic Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baiochhi, G., and E. Gamuza. 2014. Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society 42: 29–50.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, H.D. 2011. Political activities in the Internet, slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday 18(2).Google Scholar
  3. Diaz, N. 2014. Hoped-for democracy. 25 years of participatory budgeting worldwide. São Brás de Alportel: In Loco.Google Scholar
  4. Dryzek, J. 2002. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fung, A., and E.O. Wright (eds.). 2003. Deepening democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Gabriel, O., and N. Kersting. 2014. Politische Beteiligung und lokale Demokratie: Strukturen politischer Partizipation und ihre Wirkungen auf die politischen Einstellungen von Bürgerschaft, Verwaltung und Politik. In Wandel politischer Beteiligung, ed. Bertelsmann Stiftung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  7. Geissel, B., and K. Newton. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hänni, L. 2009. Kohalike omavalitsuste veebilehed e-kaasamise vahendina. In 2002: E-participation in local government, ed. I. Kearns, J. Bend, and B. Stern. London: Premier Print Group.Google Scholar
  9. Iglesias, A., and Barbeito, R.,2014. ¿Es posible más y mejor democracia?. Democracia como empoderamiento político del ciudadano. Barataria, Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias sociales, 18, pp. 215-242.Kalev, L., L. Ott, and S. Tõnis. 2009. Eesti poliitiline kultuur: poliitikastiilid ja poliitikaprotsess. Riigikogu toimetised 19. Accessible at: http://www.riigikogu.ee/rito/ index.php? id=13766 &op=archive2 25.04.2012.
  10. Kersting, N. (ed.). 2008. Politische Beteiligung. Einführung in dialogorientierte Instrumente politischer und gesellschaftlicher Partizipation. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kersting, N. 2013a. Online participation: From “invited” to “invented” spaces. International Journal of Electronic Governance 4: 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kersting, N. 2013b. Bürgerhaushalte in Deutschland. Haushaltszeitung 1: 15–16.Google Scholar
  13. Kersting, N. 2015. Local political participation in Europe. Elections and referendums. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2: 319–334.Google Scholar
  14. Kersting, N., and A. Vetter. 2003. Reforming local government in Europe. Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kersting, N., P. Schmitter, and A. Trechsel. 2008. Die Zukunft der Demokratie. In Politische Beteiligung. Einführung in dialogorientierte Instrumente politischer und gesellschaftlicher Partizipation, ed. N. Kersting. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Kersting, N., J. Caulfield, A. Nickson, D. Olowu, and H. Wollmann. 2009. Local governance reform in global perspective. Urban and regional research international. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krenjova, J., and K. Reinsalu. 2013. Good governance starts from procedural changes: Case study of preparing participatory budgeting in the city of Tartu. Socialiniai Tyrimai 3: 32, 28–40. Accessible at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/case-studies/91943793/good-governance-starts-from-procedural-changes-case-study-preparing-participatory-budgeting-city-tartu20.11.14.
  18. Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 2001. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-Communist societies. Comparative Political Studies 34: 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mouritzen, P.E., and J.H. Svara. 2002. Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sintomer, Y., C. Herzberg, and N. Röcke. 2008. Der Bürgerhaushalte in Europa. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  21. Sintomer, Y., C. Herzberg, and A. Röcke 2010. Der Bürgerhaushalt. In Europa—eine realistische Utopie? Zwischen partizipativer Demokratie, Verwaltungsmodernisierung und sozialer Gerechtigkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, GWV Fachverlage GmbH.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, G. 2009. Democratic innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Titma, M., and A. Rämmer. 2006. Estonia: Changing value patterns in a divided society. In Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe, ed. H. Klingemann, D. Fuchs, and J. Zielonka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Kersting
    • 1
  • Jana Gasparikova
    • 2
  • Angel Iglesias
    • 3
  • Jelizaveta Krenjova
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MuensterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.School of Economic Management and Public AdministrationBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.University Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  4. 4.Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and GovernanceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations