Advertisement

Conclusion: back to the essence and the future

  • Petrus C. van DuyneEmail author
  • Jackie H. Harvey
  • Liliya Y. Gelemerova
Chapter

Abstract

We started this work by looking back to the late 1980s and introduced in the first chapter a hypothetical layman questioning the gravity of the laundering threat that has loomed above our heads for decades without it actually coming down. In the previous chapter we reintroduced this layman with his persistent plain question “What is all this good for?” In relation to the two main aims of combating money laundering: integrity and crime reduction. Trying to answer this question left us rather speechless. Must we admit that there is not sufficient material for a satisfactory answer? Or shall we prevaricate and say the question is not well phrased? That would be nonsense: the question is perfectly clear and simple. Maybe it is a matter of a disorderly ‘conceptual cupboard’ which needs a severe tidying-up. While doing so we may find the outlines of a correspondingly simple answer, provided there is adequate material.

References

  1. Alldridge, P., (2002), Moral Limits of the Crime of Money Laundering, Buff. Crim. L. Rev, 5, 279–320.Google Scholar
  2. Alldridge, P., (2003), Money Laundering Law: Forfeiture, confiscation, civil recovery, criminal laundering and taxation of the proceeds of crime, Oxford –Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Borgers, M.J., (2001), De ontnemingsmaatregel. Boom Juridische Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  4. Busuioc, M., (2007), Defining Money Laundering. Predicate Offences-The Achilles’ Heel of Anti-Money Laundering Legislation. In B. Unger (ed.), The Scale and Impacts of Money Laundering Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Comstock, M.B., (1994), GATT and GATS: A public morals attack on money laundering. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 15(1), 139–177.Google Scholar
  6. Duyne, P.C. van, (1998), Money-laundering, Pavlov’s dog and beyond. The Howard Journal, 37(4), 395–374.Google Scholar
  7. Duyne, P.C. van, (2004), The creation of a threat image: Media, policy making and organised crime. In: P.C. van Duyne, M. Jager, K. von Lampe and J.L. Newell (eds.), Threats and phantoms of organised crime, corruption and terrorism. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Duyne, P.C. van and de Miranda, H., (1999), The emperor’s cloths of disclosure: Hot money and suspect disclosures. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31(3), 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duyne, P.C. van, Groenhuijsen, M.S. and Schudelaro, A.A.P., (2005), Balancing financial threats and legal interests in money-laundering policy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 43(2-3), 117–147.Google Scholar
  10. Duyne, P.C. van, Harvey J., and Gelemerova, L., (2016), ‘The Monty Python Flying Circus of Money Laundering and the Question of Proportionality’ Chapter 10 in ‘Illegal Entrepreneurship, Organized Crime and Social Control: Essays in Honour of Professor Dick Hobbs’ (ed) G. Antonopolous, Springer, Studies in Organized Crime 14.Google Scholar
  11. Duyne, P.C. van, Harvey J. and Gelemerova, L., (2018a), A ‘Risky’ Risk Approach: Proportionality in ML/TF Regulation. Chapter 15 in C. King, C. Walker J. Gurulé. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminal and Terrorist Financing Law, Palgrave, 978-3-319-64497-4, 420951.Google Scholar
  12. FATF Annual Reports (1990 to date) are all available from www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/
  13. FATF, (2012), High-level principles and objectives for FATF and FATF-style regional bodies. Paris.Google Scholar
  14. FATF, (2013a), Guidance: National money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment Strategies, February Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Ferwerda, J., (2013), The effects of money laundering, part III, chapter 3 in Unger, B. and van der Linde, D. (2013). Research Handbook on Money Laundering. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Gallant, M.M. (2010). Promise and perils: the making of global money laundering, terrorist finance norms. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 13(3), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelemerova, L., (2011), The anti-money laundering system in the context of globalisation a panopticom built on quicksand, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Gordon, J.E., (1995), Prosecutors who seize too much and the theories they love: money laundering, facilitation, and forfeiture notes. Duke Law Journal, 44(4), 744–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halliday, T., Levi, M. and Reuter P., (2014). Global Surveillance of Dirty Money: Assessing Assessments of Regimes to Control Money-Laundering and Combat the Financing of Terrorism (pp. 1–61): Centre on Law and Globalisation.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey, J., (2005), “Controlling the Flow of Money-Laundering or Satisfying the Regulators”, In van Duyne P.C., von Lampe, K., van Dijck, M. and Newell, J. (Eds.), The Organised Crime Economy: Managing Crime Markets in Europe, Tilburg, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal.Google Scholar
  21. Hulsse, R., (2007), Creating demand for global governance: the making of a global money-laundering problem. Global Society, 21(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulsse, R., (2008), Even clubs can’t do without legitimacy: Why the anti-money laundering blacklist was suspended. Regulation and Governance, 2(4), 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, C., (2013), Following the money trail: Civil forfeiture of criminal assets in Ireland. In P.C. Van Duyne et al., Human dimensions in organised crime, money laundering and corruption. Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Levi, M., (2018), ‘Green with envy: Environmental crimes and black money, chapter 9 in Spapens, T., White, R., van Uhm, D. and Huisman, W. (Eds.), Green Crimes and Dirty Money. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Levi, M., and Reuter, P., (2006), Money Laundering. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 289–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McClean, D. (1989). Seizing the Proceeds of Crime: The State of the Art. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 38(2), 334–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naylor, R.T., (1999), “Wash-Out: A Critique of the Follow-The-Money Methods in Crime Control Policy,”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 32, 1–57.Google Scholar
  28. Nicolae, R., (2013), Peculiarities of unjustified wealth confiscation policy in Romania. pp. 293–323, in Van Duyne, P.C., Harvey, J., Antonopoulos, G.A., von Lampe, K., Maljević, A. and Spencer, J., (Eds.), (2013), Human dimensions in organised crime, money laundering and corruption. Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Nichols, L.T., (1997), Social problems as landmark narratives: Bank of Boston, mass media and “money laundering”. Social Problems, 44, 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pieth, M. (1999). The Harmonization of Law against Economic Crime, European Journal Law Reform, 527–546.Google Scholar
  31. Quirk, P., (1996), “Macroeconomic implications of money laundering”. IMF Working Paper, WP/96/66, Monetary and Exchange Affairs Department, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Reuter, P., (2013), Are the estimates of the volume of money laundering either feasible or useful? In: Unger, B and van der Linde, D. (Eds.), Research handbook on money laundering. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Rider, B.A.K., (1999), The Crusade against Money Laundering - Time to Think. European. Journal Law Reform, 501–527.Google Scholar
  34. Sharman, J.C., (2008), Power and discourse in policy diffusion: anti-money laundering in developing states. International Studies Quarterly, 52(3), 635–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vruggink, J.C., (2001), Gepakt en gezakt. Invloed van de ontnemingsmaatregel op daders. Leiden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petrus C. van Duyne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jackie H. Harvey
    • 2
  • Liliya Y. Gelemerova
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Penal LawTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  3. 3.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations