Advertisement

Zooming In, Zooming Out: The Forms and Scales of Children’s Mobilities

  • Lesley MurrayEmail author
  • Susana Cortés-Morales
Chapter

Abstract

Seeking to understand and integrate aspects of children’s mobilities that have been neglected, in Chapter  3 we challenge the rootedness of children’s mobilities in the fixed places of home and school, discussing children’s mobilities, spaces, and practices with reference to a zooming in and out of space, ensuring that we attend to micro- and macro-spaces of children’s mobilities as well as the spaces in between. We illuminate a range of often hidden everyday mobile practices with an attention to scale and to how each mobile practice can be seen from diverse scales: from the corporeal movements of babies to the interregional or international migratory movements of children and young people, these are seen as phenomena that can be looked at from diverse geographical scales, from the micro-corporeal movements to the relations and interdependencies at wider scales involved in all forms of movement.

References

  1. Amin, A. (2013). Telescopic urbanism and the poor. City, 17(4), 476–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badland, H. M., Oliver, M., Duncan, M., & Schantz, P. (2011). Measuring children’s independent mobility: Comparing objective and self-report approaches. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badland, H., Kearns, R., Carroll, P., Oliver, M., Mavoa, S., Donovan, P., et al. (2016). Development of a systems model to visualise the complexity of children’s independent mobility. Children’s Geographies, 14(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, J. (2009). Driven to distraction? Children’s experiences of car travel. Mobilities, 4(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, J. (2011). ‘Manic mums’ and ‘distant dads’? Gendered geographies of care and the journey to school. Health & Place, 17, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BBC. (2018, June 22). Migrant families separation poster girl not taken from mum. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44578339.
  8. Beazley, H. (2000). Home sweet home? Street children’s sites of belonging. In G. Holloway & S. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Beazley, H., & Ross, D. (2017). Dominant positionings and paradoxical mobilities: Child migrants in Java, Indonesia. In C. Ni Laoire & A. White (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bhosale, J., Duncan, S., Stewart, T., Chaix, B., Kestens, Y., & Schofield, G. (2017). Measuring children’s independent mobility: Comparing interactive mapping with destination access and licence to roam. Children’s Geographies, 15(6), 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borden, I. (2001). Skateboarding, space and the city: Architecture and the body. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  12. Bril, B., & Sabatier, C. (1986). The cultural context of motor development: Postural manipulations in the daily life of Bambara babies. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 9, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carver, A., Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., & van Slujs, E. M. F. (2014). Independent mobility on the journey to school: A joint cross-sectional and prospective exploration of social and physical environmental influences. Journal of Transport and Health, 1(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cassey, E. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In S. Feld & K. Basso (Eds.), Senses of Place (pp. 13–52). Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Advance seminar series.Google Scholar
  15. Chaudhury, M., Hinckson, E., Badland, H., & Oliver, M. (2019). Children’s independence and affordances experienced in the context of public open spaces: A study of diverse inner-city and suburban neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand. Children’s Geographies, 17(1), 49–63.Google Scholar
  16. Christensen, P., & Mikkelsen, M. (2011). ‘There is nothing here for us…’: How girls create meaningful places of their own through movement. Children and Society, 27, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen, P., James, A., & Jenks, C. (2000). Home and movement: Children constructing ‘family time’. In G. Holloway & S. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Christensen, P., Hadfield-Hill, S., Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2018). Children living in sustainable built environments: New urbanisms, new citizens. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Christensen, P., Mikkelsen, M., Sick Nielsen, T., & Harder, H. (2011). Children, mobility and space: Using GPS and mobile phone technologies in ethnographic research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 227–246.Google Scholar
  20. Clement, S., & Waitt, G. (2018). Pram mobilities: Affordances and atmospheres that assemble childhood and motherhood on the move. Children’s Geographies, 16(3), 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cortés-Morales, S. (2015). From cocooning to Skyping: An ethnographic study of young children’s everyday mobilities in an English town (PhD thesis). University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  22. Cortés-Morales, S., & Christensen, P. (2014). Unfolding the pushchair. Children’s mobilities and everyday technologies. Research on Education and Media, 6(2), 9–18. Google Scholar
  23. Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move, mobility in the modern Western world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Cresswell, T. (2010a). Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cresswell, T. (2010b). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Currie, D., Pomerantz, S., & Kelly, D. (2009). Girl power: Girls reinventing girlhood. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. De Certeau, M. (1984). ‘Walking in the city’ in the practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California press.Google Scholar
  28. Department for Transport. (2018). National travel survey: England 2017. London: Department for Transport.Google Scholar
  29. Drianda, R. P., & Kinoshita, I. (2011). Danger from traffic to fear of monkeys: Children’s independent mobility in four diverse sites in Japan. Global Studies of Childhood, 1, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Farmer, D. (2017). Making sense and connections within global contexts. In C. Ni Laoire, A. White, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys: Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Gallacher, L. (2005). ‘The terrible twos’: Gaining control in the nursery? Children’s Geographies, 3(2), 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gigengack, R. (2000). Critical omissions: How street children studies can address self-destructive agency. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Gottlieb, A. (2000). Where have all the babies gone? Toward an anthropology of infants (and their caretakers). Anthropological Quarterly 73(3), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gottlieb, A. (2004). The afterlife is where we come from. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hannam, K., Buttler, G., & Morris Paris, C. (2014). Developments and key issues in tourism mobilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 171–185.Google Scholar
  36. Hanson, S., & Hanson, P. (1981). The impact of married women’s employment on household travel patters: A Swedish example. Transportation, 10, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hertrich, V., Bister, A., & Strohmaier, P. (2012). ‘Girls’ labour migration in rural Mali: Patterns trends and influence on marriage. Working Paper Prepared for the Population Council (New York) project: ‘Adolescent girls’ migration. Paris: Institute National d’Etudes Demographiques (INED).Google Scholar
  38. Holdsworth, C. (2013). Family and intimate mobilities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2000). Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology, 34, 763–783.Google Scholar
  40. Holpuch, A., & Gambino, L. (2018, June 18). Why are families being separated at the US border? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/18/why-are-families-being-separated-at-the-us-border-explainer.
  41. Huijsman, R. (2017). Children and young people in migration: A relational approach. In C. Ni Laoire, A. White, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys: Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Hyundai. (2006). The great escape. Born to be free. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9Hlow_d9Bg.
  43. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jensen, M. (2017). Urban pram strolling: A mobilities design perspective. Mobilities.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1394683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jirón, P., & Cortés, S. (2011, October 20–21). Mobile relations, mobile shadows. Understanding contemporary urban daily living through shadowing techniques. Paper Presented at International Workshop: The Everyday Life of Multi-Local Families. Concepts, Methods and the Example of Post-Separation Families, Munich, Alemania.Google Scholar
  46. Jirón, P., & Iturra, L. (2014). Travelling the journey. Understanding mobility trajectories by recreating research paths. In L. Murray & S. Upstone (Eds.), Researching and representing mobilities: Transdisciplinary encounters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Johnson, V., Johnson, L., Magati B. O., & Walker, D. (2017). Breaking intergenerational transmissions of poverty: Perspectives of street-connected girls in Nairobi. In L. Murray & S. Robertson (Eds.), 2016. Intergenerational mobilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global: Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. University of Minessota Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kelly, D., Pomerantz, S., & Currie, D. (2005). Skater girlhood and emphasized femininity: ‘You can’t land an ollie properly in heels’. Gender and Education, 17(3), 229–248.Google Scholar
  50. Kwong, J. (2017). Geographic origin and social class as “geoclass” and the education of migrant children in China 1980–2013. In C. Ni Laoire, A. White, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys: Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Lamphere, L. (1986). Working mothers and family strategies: Portuguese and Colombian women in a New England community. In R. J. Simon & C. B. Brettell (Eds.), International migration: The female experience. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
  52. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Laurier, E., Lorimer, H., Brown, B., Jones, O., Noble, A., Perry, M., et al. (2008). Driving and ‘passengering’ notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities, 3(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2008). Globalisation in practice: On the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum, 39, 133–143.Google Scholar
  56. Ledwith, V., & Reilly, K. (2017). Young migrants’ educational achievement: Moving to inequality in Galway City, Ireland. In C. Ni Laoire, A. White, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys: Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Loo, B. P. Y., & Lam, W. W. Y. (2013). Does neighbourhood count in affecting children’s journeys to schools? Children’s Geographies, 13(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Massey, D. (1991). A global sense of place. Marxism Today, 38, 24–29.Google Scholar
  60. Massey, D. (1998). The spatial constructions of youth cultures. In T. Skelton & G. Valentine (Eds.), Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures (pp. 122–130). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Massey, D. (2000). Travelling thoughts. In P. Gilroy, L. Grossberg, & A. McRobbie (Eds.), Without guarantees: In honour of Stuart Hall (pp. 225–232). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geographiska Annaler, 86B(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Matthews, H., Limb, M., & Taylor, M. (2000). The ‘street as thirdspace’. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. McQuaid, R., & Chen, T. (2012). Commuting times: The role of gender, children and part-time work. Research in Transportation Economics, 34, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mikkelsen, M., & Christensen, P. (2009). Is children’s independent mobility really independent? A study of children’s independent mobility combining ethnography and GPS/mobile phones technologies. Mobilities, 4(1), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Murray, L. (2008). Motherhood, risk and everyday mobilities. In T. P. Uteng, & T. Cresswell (Eds.), Gendered mobilities. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  67. Murray, L. (2009a). Making the journey to school: The gendered and generational aspects of risk in constructing everyday mobility. Health, Risk & Society, 11(5), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Murray, L. (2009b). Looking at and looking back: Visualization in mobile research. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Murray, L. (2015a). Age-friendly mobilities: A transdisciplinary and intergenerational perspective. Journal of Transport and Health, 2(2), 302–307. ISSN 2214-1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Murray, L. (2015b). Rethinking children’s independent mobility and revealing cultures of children’s agentic and imaginative mobilities through ‘Emil and the detectives’. Transfers: Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies, 5(1), 28–45.Google Scholar
  71. Murray, L. (2016). Conceptualising intergenerational mobilities. In L. Murray & S. Robertson (Eds.), Intergenerational mobilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Murray, L., & Doughty, K. (2016). Interdependent, imagined and embodied mobilities in mobile social space: Disruptions in ‘normality’, ‘habit’ and ‘routine’. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 72–82.Google Scholar
  73. Murray, L., & Mand, K. (2013). Travelling near and far: Placing children’s mobile emotions. Emotion, Space and Society, 9, 72–79.Google Scholar
  74. Murray, L., & Overall, S. (2017). Moving around children’s fiction: Agentic and impossible mobilities. Mobilities, 12(4), 572–584.Google Scholar
  75. Murray, L., Sawchuk, K., & Jirón, P. (2016). Comparative mobilities. Mobilities, 11(4), 542–552 (Special 10th Anniversary Issue).Google Scholar
  76. Nieuwenhuys, O. (2003). Growing up between places of work and non-places of childhood. In K. F. Olwig & E. Gullov (Eds.), Children’s places: Crosscultural perspectives. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  77. O’Brien, M., Jones, D., & Sloan, D., & Rustin, M. (2000). Children’s independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood, 7, 257–277.Google Scholar
  78. Olwig, K. F., & Gullov, E. (Eds.). (2003). Children’s places: Crosscultural perspectives. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Pooley, C., Turnbull, J., & Adams, M. (2005a). A mobile century? Changes in everyday mobility in Britain in the twentieth century. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  80. Pooley, C., Turnbull, J., & Adams, M. (2005b). The journey to school in Britain since the 1940s: Continuity and change. Area, 37(1), 43–53.Google Scholar
  81. Porter, N. (2005). Female skateboarders and their negotiation of space and identity (ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, Masters thesis). Concordia University. Google Scholar
  82. Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., & Mashiri, M. (2010). Where dogs, ghosts and lions roam: Learning from mobile ethnographies on the journey from school. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Priya Uteng, T., & Cresswell, T. (Eds.). (2008). Gendered mobilities. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  84. Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Punch, S. (2000). Children’s strategies for creating playspaces: Negotiating independence in rural Bolivia. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. (2009). My personal child health record. Harlow Healthcare, South Shields.Google Scholar
  87. Schoeppe, S., Duncan, M. J., Badland, H. M., Rebar, A. L., & Vandelanotte, C. (2015a). Too far from home? Adult attitudes on children’s independent mobility range. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 482–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schoeppe, S., Tranter, P., Duncan, M. J., Curtis, C., Carver, A., & Malone, K. (2015b). Australian children’s independent mobility levels: Secondary analyses of cross-sectional data between 1991 and 2012. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 408–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shaw, B., Watson, B., Frauendienst, B., Redecker, A., Jones, T., & Hillman, M. (2013). Children’s independent mobility: A comparative study in England and Germany (1971–2010). London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  90. Sheller, M. (2004). Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theory, Culture and Society, 21(4/5), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice. The politics of movement in an age of extremes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  92. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sime, D. (2017). Migrant children in cities: The spatial constructions of their everyday lives. In C. Ni Laoire, A. White, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Movement, mobilities and journeys: Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Skelton, T. (2000). “Nothing to do, nowhere to go?” Teenage girls and public space in the Rhonda Valleys. In S. H. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s Geographies (pp. 69–85). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Skelton, T., & Gough, K. V. (2013). Introduction: Young people’s im/mobile urban geographies. Urban Studies, 50(3), 455–466.Google Scholar
  96. Tebet, G., & Abramowicz, A. (2016). Finding a place for babies and their spatialities. In T. Skelton & S. Aitken (Eds.), Establishing geographies of children and young people I. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  97. Thissen, F., Droogleever Fortuijn, J., Strijker, D., & Haartsen, T. (2010). Migration intentions of rural youth in the Westhoek, Flanders, Belgium and the Veenkolonien, The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Toyota. (2015). Loving eyes—Toyota safety sense. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Me1GIDy-U9g.
  99. UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  100. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the 21st Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  101. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  102. Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., Trapp, G., Timperio, A., McCormack, G., et al. (2013). Does the walkability of neighbourhoods affect children’s independent mobility, independent of parental, socio-cultural and individual factors? Children’s Geographies, 12(4), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ward, C. (1979). The child in the city. Harmonsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  104. Witten, K., Kearns, R., Carroll, P., Asiasiga, L., & Tava’e, N. (2013). New Zealand parents’ understandings of the intergenerational decline in children’s independent outdoor play and active travel. Children’s Geographies, 11(2), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Young, A. (2006). The flipside: Young womens’ understanding of the risks in skateboarding (Online). Available at http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/27430.
  106. Zeiher, H. (2003). Shaping daily life in urban environments. In P. Christensen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in the city: Home neighbourhood and community (pp. 66–81). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied Social ScienceUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations