Advertisement

Patterns of Political Elites

  • John Higley
Chapter

Abstract

Efforts to specify main patterns of political elite relations and link them to types of political regimes and other major political phenomena have been a long-standing aspect of elite theory and research. Some patterns provide elite persons and groups with considerable security and ways of defending and advancing their interests peacefully. Other patterns make elite power wielding a precarious, highly uncertain game in which conspiracy and violence are key elements. Different patterns result in different modes of elite behavior: relatively benevolent or predacious, relatively calculating or capricious, and relatively cooperative or conflicting. The systematic study of political elites thus involves identifying patterns of elite relations in modern societies, how and when changes from one to another pattern occur, the ways in which mass populations affect elite relations, and the chief political and other consequences of each pattern. These are complex and controversial issues. By analyzing the relations and practices of political elites in the world’s major regions and many of its most important national states, this section of the handbook addresses these issues.

References

  1. Aron, R. (1950). Social Structure and the Ruling Class. British Journal of Sociology, 1(March–June), 1–16, 126–43.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dahrendorf, R. (1967). Society and Democracy in Germany. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential in Western Democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Femia, J. V. (2007). Pareto and Political Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Field, G. L., & Higley, J. (1980). Elitism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Finer, S. E. (1968). Pareto and Pluto-Democracy: The Retreat to the Galapagos. American Political Science Review, 62(2), 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham: Bowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Keller, S. (1963). Beyond the Ruling Class. Strategic Elites in Modern Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Meisel, J. (1958). The Myth of the Ruling Class. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Miliband, R. (1969). The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mosca, G. (1923). The Ruling Class (H. D. Kahn, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Pareto, V. (1921/1984). The Transformation of Democracy. Introduced by Charles H. Powers. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Piekalkiewicz, J., & Penn, A. W. (1996). Politics of Ideocracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam, R. D. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Vol. 1. The Contemporary Debate. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Higley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations