From Analogue to Digital: Synthesizers and Discourses of Film Sound in the 1980s

  • Katherine Spring
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The chapter considers the adoption of digital synthesizers by film sound professionals in the early 1980s. Drawing on the notion of ‘transectorial innovation’ evoked by Paul Thèberge (Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology, 1997), Spring first explains how the design of early digital synthesizers, inherited largely from the industries of audio recording and engineering, appealed to film composers and sound editors alike. The chapter then examines how discourse in contemporaneous trade industry magazines reflected and shaped readers’ understandings of the relationship between the new technologies and traditional practices of post-production film sound. Prominent subjects of discussion in the trade papers included the authenticity of synthesized sound, the role of human creativity in relation to computer technology, and the perceived conflation of two previously distinct post-production practices: music composition and sound editing.

Keywords

Motion Picture Musical Instrument Digital Instrument Sound Effect Film Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Appleton, J. H. (1989) 21st Century Musical Instruments: Hardware and Software (New York: Institute for Studies in American Music, Conservatory of Music, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York).Google Scholar
  2. Armbruster, G. (1984) ‘Frank Serafine: Designing Harmonious, Hallucinatory, & Horrifying Sounds for Hollywood Hits’, Keyboard, Vol. 10, No. 9, 16– 17, 19–21.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, S. (1982) ‘Film Sound Editing Techniques, Part 2’, Recording Engineer/Producer, Vol. 13, No. 1, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64–7.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, J. (2008) ‘The Sounds of “Silence”: Dolby Stereo, Sound Design, and The Silence of the Lambs’ in J. Beck & T. Grajeda (eds) Lowering the Boom: Critical Studies in Film Sound (Urbana: University of Illinois Press), 68–83.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R.S. (1994) Overtones and Undertones: Reading Film Music (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  6. Burt, G. (1994) The Art of Film Music (Boston: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar
  7. ‘Buyer’s Guide: Synthesizers and Computer Software,’ (1986) dB, Vol. 20, No. 3, 49–56, 59.Google Scholar
  8. Crafton, D. (1997) The Talkies: American Cinema’s Transition to Sound, 1926–1931 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).Google Scholar
  9. Daley, D. (1987) ‘Ivy League Goes Digital’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 7, 64, 69–70.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, B.D. (1984) ‘Synthesizers Fan Controversy in Music Field’, Variety, 14 November, 13, 15.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, C. (1988) ‘Paramount’s Electronic Cottage’, dB, Vol. 22, No. 3, 13, 16–19.Google Scholar
  12. Di Pasquale, J. (1985) ‘Synthesizers, Composers Almost Inseparable’, Variety, 29 October, 245, 248–9.Google Scholar
  13. DiMauro, P. (1987) ‘Digital Synth Consultants Help Artists In Studio Expertise’, Variety, 14 October, 219.Google Scholar
  14. Donnelly, K.J. (2013) ‘Extending Film Aesthetics: Audio Beyond Visuals’ in J. Richardson, C. Gorbman and C. Vernallis (eds) The Oxford Handbook of New Audiovisual Aesthetics (New York: Oxford University Press), 357–371.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs, V. (1984) ‘The Synthesizer: Instrument, Not The Player, Changes Music’, Billboard, 16 June, BM6, BM16.Google Scholar
  16. Halfhill, T.R. (1982) ‘The Sounds of TRON’, Compute!, Vol. 4, No. 9, 18, 20, 22.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, T. (2012), Electronic and Experimental Music: Technology, Music, and Culture, 4th ed. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  18. Jacobson, L. (1987) ‘Synths in the Studio’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 7, 168–174.Google Scholar
  19. Karlin, F. and R. Wright (2013) On the Track: A Guide to Contemporary Film Scoring, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  20. King, M. (1986) ‘The Modus Operandus of David Kurtz—Part II’, dB, Vol. 20, No. 2, 54–7.Google Scholar
  21. Kirk, C. (1984) ‘Proposed AFM-Producers Pact Would Limit Tuner Work Loss to Technology’, Variety, 1 March, 1, 22.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, R.D. (1983) ‘An Interview with Frank Serafine’, Soundtrack: The CinemaScore & Soundtrack Archives, http://www.runmovies.eu/?p=9186, date accessed 15 March 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, R.D. (n.d.) ‘HYPER-REALITY: ALAN HOWARTH’s Synthesized Scores and Specialized Sound Effects’, Alan Horwath, http://alanhowarth.com/press-articles.html, date accessed 1 September 2014.
  24. LoBrutto, V. (1994) Sound-on-Film: Interviews with Creators of Film Sound (Westport: Praeger).Google Scholar
  25. Macar, R. (1987) ‘Post-Script: Putting the Synclavier into “Overdrive”’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 1, 112, 115.Google Scholar
  26. Manning, P. (2013) Electronic and Computer Music (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  27. Moog, R. (1982) ‘Wendy Carlos & Michael Fremer Reveal the Secrets Behind the Soundtrack of Tron’, Keyboard, Vol. 8, No. 11, 53–7.Google Scholar
  28. Moorer, J.A. (1982) ‘The Lucasfilm Audio Signal Processor’, Computer Music Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, 22–32.Google Scholar
  29. Moorer, J.A., C. Abbott, P. Nye, J. Borish and J. Snell (1986) ‘The Digital Audio Processing Station: A New Concept in Audio Postproduction’, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 34, No. 6, 454–463.Google Scholar
  30. Mosely, J. (1981) ‘Motion Picture Sound in Record-Industry Perspective’, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 29, No. 3, 114–125.Google Scholar
  31. Oppenheimer, L. (1986) ‘Serafine FX: Midi in the Movies?’, dB, Vol. 20, No. 2, 43–4, 46.Google Scholar
  32. Oppenheimer, L. (1987) ‘Speculation on the future of Musical Instruments: Visions of the Digital Beyond’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 1, 29–32.Google Scholar
  33. Palmer, S.L. (1984) ‘The Creative Interface: Computers and Music Production’, Recording Engineer/Producer, Vol. 15, No. 1, 30, 32, 152.Google Scholar
  34. Pasquariello, N. (1986) ‘Leslie Shatz: Sound Design for the Japanese’, dB, Vol. 20, No. 2, 60, 63–4.Google Scholar
  35. Pasquariello, N. (1987) ‘Trends in Film Sound (Part Two)’, Mix, vVl. 11, No. 12, 90–4, 96–8, 143.Google Scholar
  36. Petrosky, M. (2009) ‘Interview with Frank Serafine’, Tron Wiki. http://tron.wikia.com/wiki/Tron_Wiki:Frank_Serafine_Interview, date accessed 15 June 2014.
  37. Prager, B. (1986) ‘Music by the Numbers: Surrendering Creative Control’, Billboard, 15 February, 10.Google Scholar
  38. Reid, G. (2000) Synth Secrets, Part 20: Introducing Polyphony. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/dec00/articles/synthsec.asp, date accessed 6 June 2014.
  39. Rothman, M. (1993) ‘Lucas takes an Avid interest in digital firm’, Daily Variety, 21 April. https://variety.com/1993/film/news/lucas-takes-an-avid-interest-in-digital-firm-106109, date accessed 15 June 2014.
  40. Sadoff, R.H. (2013) ‘Scoring for Film and Video Games: Collaborative Practices and Digital Post-Production’ in C. Vernallis, A. Herzog and J. Richardson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Sound and Image in Digital Media (New York: Oxford University Press), 663–681.Google Scholar
  41. Serafine, F. (1980a) ‘Probing the Sounds of Star Trek’, Studio Sound, Vol. 22, No. 8, 30–2.Google Scholar
  42. Serafine, F. (1980b) ‘The New Motion Picture Sound’, American Cinematographer, Vol. 61, No. 8, 796–799, 846.Google Scholar
  43. Serafine, F. (1982) ‘Sound Effects Design and Synthesis for Tron’, American Cinematographer, Vol. 63, No. 8, 807, 830–4.Google Scholar
  44. Soifer, R. (1987) ‘The American Federation of Musicians: A Study in Contrasts’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 8, 175–7, 179, 181–2.Google Scholar
  45. Spring, K. (2015) ‘Telephone Interview with Ben Burtt’, 30 January.Google Scholar
  46. Synclavier advertising insert (1987) Mix, Vol. 11, No. 1, 14–24.Google Scholar
  47. ‘Synclavier Marries Art and Technology’ (1982) Billboard, 20 March, 31.Google Scholar
  48. Terry, K. (1983) ‘Synthesizers Change Music Biz: Musicians See a New Era Dawning’, Variety, 6 July, 1, 67.Google Scholar
  49. The DroidWorks (1985) SoundDroid: The All-Digital Sound Studio in a Box, The DroidWorks, North Hollywood.Google Scholar
  50. Thèberge, P. (1997) Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology (Hanover and London: Wesleyan University Press).Google Scholar
  51. Tully, T. (1987) ‘A Sampling of Sampling’, Mix, Vol. 11, No. 1, 49, 51–2, 181.Google Scholar
  52. Vail, M. (2014) The Synthesizer: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding, Programming, Playing, and Recording the Ultimate Electronic Music Instrument (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  53. Wright, B.A. (2011) ‘Sound from Start to Finish: Professional Style and Practice in Modern Hollywood Sound Production’, Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, B. (2013) ‘What Do We Hear: The Pluralism of Sound Design in Hollywood Sound Production’, The New Soundtrack, Vol. 3, No. 2, 137–157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Spring
    • 1
  1. 1.Wilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations