Theorizing Military Masculinities and National Identities: The Norwegian Experience

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Norway has based its security on aid from great military powers, and is therefore a useful site for examining the idea of complicit masculinities: a position that benefits from the current social order, and thus complying with dominant group interests and hegemonic ideals. This chapter illustrates how such a position led Norway to take an active part in Western interventionism, resulting in a military transformation that challenged national identity, the traditional hegemonic masculinity ideal and the established gender order. This caused a struggle over military identity. By examining this identity struggle the chapter contributes to the broader debates of masculinities, how they work, how they are linked to hierarchical social structures, and how military masculinity is challenged by women’s bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2006) Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Belkin, A. (2012) Bring Me Men. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bjørnstad, T. C. (2011) Fra soldater av folket til soldater for staten. Sosiologi I Dag, 41 (1): 5–31.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1998) Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L.J. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, M.T. (2012) Enlisting Masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho, B. d., & Neumann, I.B. (2015) Small States and Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, O. (1994) Helterollen og det nasjonalistiske prosjekt. Tradisjon. Tidsskrift for Folkeminnevitenskap, 24: 49–70.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, R. (1987) Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R. (2005) Masculinities. Sydney: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Connell, R. (2009) Short Introductions: Gender. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, D., Kimmel, M.S., & Schroeder, K. (2000) ‘What’s This About a Few Good Men?’: Negotiating Gender in Military Education. In N. Lesko, (Ed.) Masculinities at School. Beverley Hills: Sage, pp. 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diesen, S. (2008) Den nye krigerkulturen. December 18th. Retrieved from Aftenposten: http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kronikker/article2830521.ece
  14. Duncanson, C. (2013) Forces for Good? Military Masculiniteis in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Duncanson, C. (2014) Masculine Rivalries and Security: The US and UK in Iraq and Afghanistan. July 4th Retrieved from E-International Relations: http://www.e-ir.info/2014/07/04/masculine-rivalries-and-security-the-us-and-uk-in-iraq-and-afghanistan/
  16. Dyvik, S. (2016) ‘Valhalla rising’: Gender, embodiment and experience in military memoirs. Security Dialogue, online 14 January 2016.Google Scholar
  17. Edström, H., Lunde, N.T. & Matlary, J.H. (2009) Krigerkultur i en fredsnasjon. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrenreich, B. (1997) Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passion of War. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elshtain, J.B. (1995) Women and War. With a new Epilogue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Enloe, C.H. (1983) Does Khaki Become You?: The Militarisation of Women’s Lives. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  21. Enloe, C.H. (1993) The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Enloe, C. H. (2000) Maneuvers. The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Enloe, C. H. (2007) Globalization and Militarism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Fauske, M. (2015) I Want to Enlist – Who Am I? In F. B. Steder, Ed. Military Women – The Achilles Heel in Defence Politics? Oslo: Abstrakt forlag, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, J. H. (2001) War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Græger, N. (2006) Norsk Forsvarsdiskurs 1990–2005: Internasjonaliseringen av Forsvaret. Avhandling Dr. Polit. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  27. Græger, N. (2011). Offisersprofesjon i endring: 20 år med internasjonalisering og transformasjon av Forsvaret. Sosiologi i dag, 41 (1): 76–101.Google Scholar
  28. Græger, N. (2015) From ‘forces for good’ to ‘forces for status’? Small State Military Status-Seeking. In B. Carvalho & I. Neumann (Eds.) Small States and Status Seeking. London: Routledge, pp. 86–107.Google Scholar
  29. Heier, T. (2006) Influence and Marginalisation. Norway’s Adaption to US Transformation Efforts in NATO, 1998–2004. Dissertation Dr. Polit. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  30. Higate, P., & Hopton, J. (2005) War, Militarism, and Masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell, Eds. Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hockey, J. (2003) No More Heroes. Masculinity in the Infantry. In P. R. Higate, Ed. Military Masculinities: Identity and the State. Westport: Praeger, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
  32. Höglund, A. T. (2010) Gender and the War on Terrorism. Uppsala: University Printers.Google Scholar
  33. King, A. (2013) The Combat Soldier: Infantry Tactics and Cohesion in the Twentieth and Twenty First Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kovitz, M. (2003) The Roots of Military Masculinity. In P. R. Higate, Ed. Military Masculinities: Identity and the State. Westport: Praeger, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  35. Kronsell, A. (2012) Gender, Sex and the Postnational Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matlary, J.H. (2008) Jobb på liv og død. VG, November 6th p.43.Google Scholar
  37. MacKenzie, M. (2015) Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth that Women Can’t Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nansen, F. (1921) Friluftsliv. Tale på Den Norske Turistforenings møde for skoleungdommen.Google Scholar
  39. Parpart, J., & Partridge, K. (2014) Soldiering On: Pushing Militarized Masculinities into new Territory. In M. Evans, C. Hemmings, M. Henry, H. Johnstone, S. Madhok, A. Plomien, & S. Wearing, Eds. The Sage Handbook of Feminist Theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  40. Petrone, K. (2002) Masculinity and Heroism in Imperial and Soviet Military-Patriotic Cultures. In B. E. Clements, R. Friedman, & D. Healey, Eds. Russian Masculinities in History and Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prividera, L.C., & Howard III, J.W. (2006) Masculinity, whiteness, and the warrior hero. Women & Language, 29 (2): 29–37.Google Scholar
  42. RAND (2010) Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy. An Update of RAND’s 1993 Study. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  43. Rones, N. (2015a) The Struggle Over Military Identity. PhD Dissertation. Oslo: The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences.Google Scholar
  44. Rones, N. (2015b) Norwegian Defence Tradition – an Obstacle to Increased Participation by Women. In F. B. Steder, (Ed.) Military Women – The Achilles Heel in Defence Politics? Oslo: Abstrakt forlag, pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, W. (2010) What Were They Thinking? Samuel A. Stouffer and the American Soldier. PhD. Dissertation. Kansas: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  46. Sasson-Levy, O. (2008) Individual Bodies, Collective State Interests: The Case of Israeli Combat Soldiers. Men and Masculinities, 10 (3): 296–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siljander, P., Kivelä, A., & Sutinen, A. (2012) Theories of Bildung and Growth. Connections and Controversies Between Continental Educational Thinking and American Pragmatism. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Sinclair-Webb, E. (2000) ‘Our Bülent is now a Commando’: Military Service and Manhood in Turkey. In M. Ghoussoub, & E. Sinclair-Webb (Eds.) Imagined Masculinities: Male identity and Culture in the Modern Middle East. London: Saqi Books, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
  49. Skjelsbæk, I., & Tryggestad, T. (2011) Kvinner i det norske forsvaret: Likestilling eller operasjonelt imperativ? Sosiologi I Dag, 41(1): 53–75.Google Scholar
  50. Slagstad, R. (2008). (Sporten). En idéhistorisk studie. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.Google Scholar
  51. Steder, F. B. (2015) Military Women – The Achilles Heel in Defence Politics? Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.Google Scholar
  52. St. meld. nr. 36 (2006–2007) Økt rekruttering av kvinner til Forsvaret. Oslo: Det Kongelige Forsvarsdepartement.Google Scholar
  53. Strøm-Erichsen, A.G. (2008) Norsk krigsinnsats. VG, November 17th, p. 39.Google Scholar
  54. Tordsson, B. (2003) Å svare på naturens åpne tiltale. Avhandling Dr. Scient. Oslo: Norges idrettshøgskole.Google Scholar
  55. Ulriken, S. (2002) Den norske forsvarstradisjonen. Militærmakt eller folkeforsvar? Oslo: Pax Forlag.Google Scholar
  56. van Creveld, M. (1991) The Transformation of War. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. van Creveld, M. (2008) The Culture of War. New York: Ballantine Books Presidio Press.Google Scholar
  58. Weiss, M. (2002) The chosen Body, The Politics of the Body in Israeli Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Woodward, R., & Winter, T. (2007) Sexing the Soldier. The politics of Gender and the Contemporary British Army. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Defence Research EstablishmentKjellerNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian School of Sport SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations