Introduction

  • Eva Bendix Petersen
  • Zsuzsa Millei
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

In the seminal book Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1977) French philosopher Michel Foucault described how the psy-disciplines—his collective term for psychiatry, psychology, psycho-analysis and other psycho-therapies—became entangled in new forms of government. 18th and 19th century liberal Europe was faced with the challenge of governing the population to ensure morality and order, but in ways that also guaranteed the freedom of individuals and a free economy. Expertise, including the social sciences, psy-disciplines, economics, statistics etc., came to provide solutions for this challenge by producing scientific knowledges about persons, society and the economy (Foucault 1988). The emerging psy-disciplines helped to make sense of individuals ‘as speaking, living, working individuals’ and also provided avenues for these individuals to understand, form and regulate themselves according to these scientific discourses (Foucault 1994: 281). In this way, expertise enabled a shift from coercive control into ‘the conduct of conduct’ and practices of self-formation. Psy-disciplines in this way are ‘technologies of the social’ (Fendler 2001), rather than simply scientific areas amassed following simple rules and propositions internal to scientific discovery. As Michel Foucault indicated, and, as has since been elaborated by Nikolas Rose (1998, 1999), among others, educational institutions and actors have been, and continue to be, central to the continuation of the psy-disciplines, their knowledges and practice, which often emerge and operate as natural, inevitable, ethical and liberating.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Inclusive Education French Philosopher Early Childhood Classroom Coercive Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Billington, T. (1996). Pathologizing children: Psychology in education and acts of government. In E. Burman, G. Aitken, A. Aldred, R. Allwood, T. Billington, G. Goldberg, A. Gordo Lopez, C. Heenan, D. Marks, & S. Warner (Eds.), Psychology discourse practice: From regulation to resistance. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S. D., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage. Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cannella, G. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fendler, L. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). New York/London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1988). The political technology of individuals. In L. M. Martin, H. Guttman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 145–162). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1994). The ethics of the concern for the self as a practice of freedom (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault ethics subjectivity and truth (Vol. One, pp. 281–302). London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Füredi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, L. J. (2007). Out of sight, out of mind/out of mind, out of site: Schooling and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(5), 585–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, L. J. (2008). From ABCs to ADHD: The role of schooling in the construction of behaviour disorder and production of disorderly objects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(1), 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harwood, V. (2006). Diagnosing ‘disorderly’ children: A critique of behaviour disorder discourses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Harwood, V. (2010). Mobile asylums: Psychopathologisation as a personal, portable psychiatric prison. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 437–451.Google Scholar
  14. Harwood, V., & Allen, J. (2014). Psychopathology at school: Theorizing mental disorders. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London/New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  16. Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. London/New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hultqvist, K. (1997). Changing rationales for governing the child: A historical perspective on the emergence of the psychological child in the context of preschool – Notes on a study in progress. Childhood, 4(4), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hultqvist, K., & Dahlberg, G. (Eds.). (2001). Governing the child in the new millennium. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  19. Ingleby, D. (1985). Professionals as socializers: The ‘psy complex’. Research in law, deviance and social control, 7 (79), 109.Laws, C. (2011) Poststructuralism at work with marginalised children. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Poststructuralist theory in practice: Working with “behaviourally disturbed” children. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacLure, M., Jones, L., Holmes, R., & MacRae, C. (2012). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLeod, J. (2000). Subjectivity and schooling in a longitudinal study of secondary students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meredyth, D., & Tyler, D. (Eds.). (1993). Child and citizen: Genealogies of schooling and subjectivity. Griffith University QLD Australia: Special Publication of the Institute for Cultural Policy Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Griffith University.Google Scholar
  24. Millei, Z., & Joronen, M. (2016). The (bio) politicization of neuroscience in Australian early years policies: fostering brain-resources as human capital. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 389–404.Google Scholar
  25. Millei, Z., & Petersen, B. E. (2015). Complicating ‘student behaviour’: Exploring the discursive constitution of ‘learner subjectivities’. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 20(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millei, Z., Griffiths, T. G., & Parkes, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). Re-theorizing discipline in education: Problems, politics, and possibilities. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  27. Nisbet, J. (2005). What is educational research? Changing perspectives through the 20th century. Research Papers in Education, 20(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Petersen, B. E., & Millei, Z. (2015). Psychological cogs in the education machine. Knowledge Cultures, Special issue on Re-claiming the past and re-conceptualising the present of educational psychology. Knowledge Cultures, 3(2), 127–145.Google Scholar
  30. Popkewitz, T. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York/London: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  32. Rimke, H. M. (2000). Governing citizens through self-help literature. Cultural Studies, 14(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics, and society in England, 1869–1939. London/Boston: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, N. S., & Abi-Rached, J. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Staunæs, D. (2011). Governing the potentials of life itself? Interrogating the promises in affective educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(3), 227–247.Google Scholar
  38. Walkerdine, V. (1994). Psychology, post-modernity and the popular.PSYCHOLOGIST-LEICESTER. 7(61–61).Walkerdine, V. (1993). Beyond developmentalism? Theory & Psychology, 3(4), 451–469.Wright, K. (2011). The rise of the therapeutic society. Washington: New Academia Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Bendix Petersen
    • 1
  • Zsuzsa Millei
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of People and TechnologyRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations