Advertisement

Teacher Cognition about Teaching and Learning

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers insights into the meanings of teaching and learning from participants’ perspective through analysing detailed classroom interaction. It mainly looks at how teaching a language is interpreted in action by teachers through the interactive work. It is suggested that a language classroom is a more complex learning environment where individual teachers implement their own educational values and agendas. In a language classroom, a teacher might focus on linguistic knowledge, communication skills, promoting content-integrated language learning or integrating culture knowledge in language learning. Sometimes teachers also enhance learning strategies and develop learners’ creativity and criticality.

Keywords

Language teacher cognition Teaching Learning Linguistic knowledge Communication CILL Culture Creativity and criticality 

References

  1. Ahmed, M. K. (1994). Speaking as cognitive regulation: A Vygotskian perspective on dialogic communication. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 157–171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the twentieth century: Theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 456–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casanave, C. P. (2010). Taking risks?: A case study of three doctoral students writing qualitative dissertations at an American university in Japan. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, F. M. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Ding, W., & Lehrer, S. F. (2007). Do peers affect student achievement in China’s secondary schools? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s ‘practical knowledge’: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43–71.Google Scholar
  12. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On conversation analysis and ‘lingua franca’ English. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4–9.Google Scholar
  16. Ghanizadeh, A., & Moafian, F. (2011). Critical thinking and emotional intelligence: Investigating and relationship among EFL learners and the contribution of age and gender. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harmer, J. (2003). Popular culture, methods and context. ELT Journal, 57(3), 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hashemi, M. R., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32(1), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–5.Google Scholar
  22. Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, K. E. (2009a). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kharkhurin, A. V. (2007). The role of cross-linguistic and cross-cultural experiences in bilinguals’ divergent thinking. In I. Kecskes & L. Albertazzi (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of bilingualism (pp. 175–210). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, L. (2008). EFL teachers’ beliefs about ICT integration in Chinese secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Queen’s University, Belfast.Google Scholar
  29. Li, L. (2011). Obstacles and opportunities for developing thinking through interaction in language classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers’ beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher’s theories. Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, L. (2017a). Social interaction and teacher cognition. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Luo, J., & Wendel, F. C. (1999). Preparing for college: Senior high school education in China. NASSP Bulletin, 83(609), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. MoE. (2001). Guidelines for compulsory education reform. Retrieved March 27, 2008 from http://www.edu.cn/20010926/3002911.shtml (Chinese).
  35. Morton, T. (2012). Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  37. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishino, T. (2011). Japanese high school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding communicative language teaching. JALT Journal, 33(2), 131–155.Google Scholar
  39. Norrick, N. R. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text, 7, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pei, M., Pawan, F., & Jin, W. (2017). “Filling the pail before the cup”: Preparing to be a teacher. In F. Pawan, W. Fan, & M. Pei (Eds.), Teacher training and professional development of Chinese English language teachers: Changing from fish to dragon (pp. 10–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39, 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rojas-Drummond, S. M., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal, 58(2), 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sakui, K. (2007). Classroom management in Japanese EFL classrooms. JALT Journal, 29(1), 41–58.Google Scholar
  46. Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahini, G., & Riazi, A. M. (2011). A PBLT approach to teaching ESL speaking, writing, and thinking skills. ELT journal, 65(2), 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Terasaki, A. (2005). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  50. Underwood, R. (2012). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the instruction of English grammar under National curriculum reforms: A theory of planned behaviour perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 911–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversation as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 244–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young, R. F. (2000). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at a joint symposium on “Interdisciplinary Interfaces with Language Testing” held at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the Language Testing Research Colloquium, March 11, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444361.pdf
  54. Young, R. F. (2008). Language and interaction: An advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. Modern Language Journal, 88, 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu, M. (2007). Recent Chinese experiences in curriculum reform. Prospects, 37(2), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations