Advertisement

Conclusion: Governing the Arctic as a Globally Embedded Space

Chapter
  • 840 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter provides concluding thoughts on the governance of the Arctic as a globally embedded space as put forward in the Introduction and exemplified in the manifold contributions to this volume. In due consideration of the insights gained from the volume, the chapter specifically re-assesses three broader governance models that have been proposed recently to manage Arctic change: empowering the Arctic Council, solidifying a multi-level regime complex consisting of Arctic-specific and Arctic-relevant institutions, and negotiating an overarching regional agreement. The authors close by reflecting upon the imaginaries that each of these models entail for governing the ‘global Arctic’.

Keywords

Arctic Ocean International Maritime Organization Polar Code Regime Complex Arctic State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arctic Council. (2016). Amarok: The Arctic Council Tracking Tool Maxi Report, 26 February 2016. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
  2. Arctic Council. (2015). Enhanced Black Carbon and Methane Emissions Reductions: An Arctic Council Framework for Action. Annex 4 to Iqaluit 2015 Senior Arctic Officials’ (SAO) Report to Ministers. Ministerial meeting, Iqaluit, Canada, 24–25 April 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, B., & Yeager, B.B. (2015). Coordinated Ocean Stewardship in the Arctic: Needs, Challenges and Possible Models for an Arctic Ocean Coordinating Agreement. Transnational Environmental Law, 4(2), 359–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conley, H.A., & Melino, M. (2016). An Arctic Redesign: Recommendations to Rejuvenate the Arctic Council. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS).Google Scholar
  5. Dubois, M.-A., & Tesar, C. (2014). Making It Stick – A New Approach to Implementing Arctic Council Decisions & Recommendations. In L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, & J. Plouffe (Eds.), Arctic Yearbook 2014: Human Capital in the North (pp. 475–476). Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
  6. Exner-Pirot, H. (2012). New Directions for Governance in the Arctic Region. In L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, & J. Plouffe (Eds.), Arctic Yearbook 2012 (pp. 224–246). Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
  7. Huebert, R., & Yeager, B.B. (2008). A New Sea: The Need for a Regional Agreement on Management and Conservation of the Arctic Marine Environment. Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme.Google Scholar
  8. Koivurova, T., & Molenaar, E.J. (2010). International Governance and Regulation of the Marine Arctic: Three Reports prepared for the WWF International Arctic Programme. Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme.Google Scholar
  9. Nord, D. (2016). The Arctic Council: Governance Within the Far North. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Stokke, O.S. (2011). Environmental Security in the Arctic: The Case for Multilevel Governance. International Journal, 66(4), 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Young, O.R. (1985). The Age of the Arctic. Foreign Policy, 61, 160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Young, O.R. (2012). Building an International Regime Complex for the Arctic: Current Status and next Steps. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Young, O.R. (2016). The Arctic Council at Twenty: How to Remain Effective in a Rapidly Changing Environment. UC Irvine Law Review.Google Scholar
  14. Young, O.R., & Osherenko, G. (1989). The Age of the Arctic: Hot Conflicts and Cold Realisties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berlin Graduate School for Transnational Studies (BTS)BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)PotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations