Advertisement

Last Stand or Renewed Urban Activism? The Copenhagen Youth House Uprising, 2007

  • Anders Lund Hansen
  • René Karpantschof
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

In the annual Freedom House report on the status of democracy around the world, Denmark, as usual, scored a clean 1.0, the highest possible rating for the year 2007. However, the Freedom House also noted ‘during the year, the demolition of a youth center in Copenhagen’s Nørrebro district sparked a series of riots leading to hundreds of arrests’ (Freedom House, 2008). The center was the so-called Youth House that since 1982 had been an important free space for the autonomous squatter movement and other alternative milieus in the city. In the early morning of 1 March 2007 the Youth House was besieged by a large police force, including helicopter-borne elite units that landed on the rooftop of the squatted and well-barricaded building. After 57 minutes of fighting from floor to floor, the last of the 36 defenders of the Youth House succumbed to water-cannon jets, exploding teargas grenades, and the increasing number of elite units who flocked into the building through bulldozer-made holes in the outer walls. Soon, numerous Youth House followers, alarmed by the breaking news-casts from all the important Danish TV stations, began to gather and build barricades in the streets throughout the district. When the rioting ebbed three days later, thousands of outraged people had taken part in protests, the burning of scores of cars, and clashes with the nationwide police force that had resorted to repeated rounds of teargas, more than 800 arrests, and even a temporary curfew. This was, in the words of the Ritzau news agency,’ some of the worst unrest in Copenhagen ever’. As a consequence, the March 2007 events in Copenhagen can be seen as a temporary form of urban uprising. For a short while, the unrest challenged the prevailing social order, suggesting, ‘there is something political in the city air struggling to be expressed’ (Harvey, 2012, p. 117).

Keywords

City Council Urban Space Urban Renewal Creative Class Urban Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, J. (2001). The politics of gambling and ambivalence: Struggles over urban policy in Copenhagen. Geographische Zeitschrift, 89, 134–143.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization—The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blennow, D. (2009). Ungdomshuset. Resistance within a normalization process and the production of subversive situations. Bachelor Thesis, Lund University, Centre for Gender Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (Eds.). (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, E., & Gullberg, A. (1997). Power struggles in the making and taking of rent gaps: The transformation of Stockholm City. In O. Källtorp et al. (Eds.), Cities in transformation—Transformation in cities: Social and symbolic change of urban space (pp. 248–265). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  6. Copenhagen Municipality. (2005). Boliger for alle—boligplan for Københavns Kommune 2005–2008 [Housing for all—Housing plan for Copenhagen Municipality 2005–2008]. Forslag (Proposal). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Municipality.Google Scholar
  7. Ditlevsen, K. (2009). Man kan mærke, at det betyder noget. Om følelser, politik og at blive aktiv i Ungdomshusbevægelsen. In R. Karpantschof & M. Lindblom (Eds.), Kampen om Ungdomshuset. Studier i et oprør. København: Frydenlund og Monsun.Google Scholar
  8. Freedom House. (2008). Denmark. Freedom in the world. www.freedomhouse.org
  9. Hansen, J. D. (2004). Historien om een Gade. Nørrebro: Nørrebro Lokalhistoriske Forening & Arkiv.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey, D. (2003). Paris, capital of modernity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Lejt Review, 53: 23–40.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Urban political ecology: Politicizing the production of urban natures. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Karpantschof, R. (2009). Ungdomshusoprøret 2006–2008. Baggrund, forløb og konsekvenser. In R. Karpantschof & M. Lindblom (Eds.), Kampen om Ungdomshuset. Studier i et oprør. København: Frydenlund og Monsun.Google Scholar
  19. Karpantschof, R. (2011). Bargaining and barricades—The political struggle over the Freetown Christiania 1971–2011. In H. Thörn, C. Wasshede, & T. Nilson (Eds.), Space for urban alternatives? Christiania 1971–2011. Stockholm: Gidlunds Förlag.Google Scholar
  20. Karpantschof, R. (2014). Storbyoprør: Husbesættere og senmodernitet. In A. Greve (Ed.), Storbyen. Urbanisering og urbanitet. København: Columbus.Google Scholar
  21. Karpantschof, R. (2015). Violence that matters! Radicalization and de-radicalization of leftist, urban movements—Denmark, 1981–2011. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karpantschof, R., & Mikkelsen, F. (2014). Youth, space, and autonomy in Copenhagen 1965–2010. In B. v. d. Steen, L. v. Hoogenhuijze, & A. Katzeff (Eds.), The city is ours. Squatting and autonomous movements in Europe. From the 1970s to the present. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global. Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Krøijer, S., & Sjørslev, I. (2011). Autonomy and the spaciousness of the social in Denmark. The conflict between Ungdomshuset and Faderhuset. Social Analysis, 55(2), 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(5), 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larsen, H.G. & Lund Hansen A., (2008). Gentrification- gentie or traumatic? Urban renewal polices and socio-economic transformations in Copenhagen. Urban Studies, 45, 2429–2448.Google Scholar
  27. Larsen, H. G., & Lund Hansen, A. (2015). Commodifying Danish housing commons. Geografiska Annaler B, 97(3), 263–274.Google Scholar
  28. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on the city. E. Kofman and E. Lebas, trans. and eds. Berkeley: University of Californian Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution. R. Bononno trans. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  31. Lund Hansen, A., Andersen, H. T. & Clark, E. (2001) Creative Copenhagen: globalization, urban governance and social change, European Planning Studies, 9, 851–869.Google Scholar
  32. Lund Hansen, A. (2006). Space wars and the new urban imperialism. PhD dissertation (ISBN: 91-974998-8-9), Department of Human Geography, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
  33. Lund Hansen, A. (2010). Forty years of system change: Lessons from the free city of Christiania. In L. A. Sandberg & T. Sandberg (Eds.), Climate change—Who’s carrying the burden? The chilly climates of the global environmental dilemma. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).Google Scholar
  34. Lund Hansen, A., Larsen, H. G., Grydehøj, A., & Clark, E. (2015). Financialisation of the built environment in Stockholm and Copenhagen. FESSUD Working Paper Series (ISSN 2052-8035).Google Scholar
  35. Merrifield, A. (2014). The new urban question. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pruijt, H. (2013). The logic of urban squatting. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Róin, P. (2015). Brosten for sammenhængskraft. Dagbladet Information, August 13: 6–7.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, N. (1979). Towards a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement of capital not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, N. (2002a). Scales of terror: The manufacturing of nationalism and the war for U.S. globalism. In M. Sorkin & S. Zukin (Eds.), After the World Trade Center. Rethinking New York City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, N. (2002b). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34, 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeynep. (2007). Freiräume—von Hamburg nach Kopenhagen und zurück Ein Bericht über die transnationale Solidaritätsbewegung. In P. Birke & C. Holmsted Larsen (Eds.), Besetze deine Stadt!—BZ din by! Häuserkämpfe und Stadtentwicklung in Kopenhagen. Berlin/Hamburg: Assoziation A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Lund Hansen
    • 1
  • René Karpantschof
    • 2
  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.University of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations