Advertisement

The Gramscian Approach to the Chinese State

  • Elaine Sio-ieng Hui
Chapter
Part of the Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies book series (Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies)

Abstract

This chapter elucidates the author’s theoretical approach to the Chinese party-state, which integrates Gramsci and Poulantzas’s theories. In addition, this chapter summarizes how the notion of hegemony has been used, although ambiguously, by scholars in the field of China Studies. Subsequently, it explicates how the author understands hegemony and the party-state in the Chinese context.

References

  1. Adamson, Walter L. 1980. Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci’s Political and Cultural Theory. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
  3. Anderson, Perry. 1976. The Antinomies of Gramsci. New Left Review 100 (1976/1977): 18.Google Scholar
  4. Aronowitz, Stanley, and Peter Bratsis. 2003. Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrow, Clyde W. 2003. The Miliband-Poulantzas Debate: An Intellectual History. In Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered, ed. Stanley Aronowitz and Peter Bratsis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benney, Mark. 1983. Gramsci on Law, Morality, and Power. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 11: 191–208.Google Scholar
  7. Bieler, Andreas, and Adam Morton. 2003. Globalisation, the State and Class Struggle: A Critical Economy Engagement with Open Marxism. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 5 (4): 467–499.Google Scholar
  8. Blecher, Marc. 2002. Hegemony and Workers’ Politics in China. China Quarterly 170: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brand, Ulrich, Christoph Görg, and Markus Wissen. 2011. Second-Order Condensations of Societal Power Relations: Environmental Politics and the Internationalization of the State from a Neo-Poulantzian Perspective. Antipode 43 (1): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckel, Sonja, and Andreas Fischer Lescano. 2009. Gramsci Reconsidered: Hegemony in Global Law. Leiden Journal of International Law 22: 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burawoy, Michael. 2003. For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society 31 (2): 193–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, Simon. 1991. State, Class Struggle, and the Reproduction of Capital. In The State Debate, ed. Simon Clarke. London: MacMillan Academic and Professional Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Culter, A. Claire. 2005. Gramsci, Law and the Culture of Global Capitalism. Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4): 527–542.Google Scholar
  15. Femia, Joseph V. 1987. Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, Eli, and Ching Kwan Lee. 2010. Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30-Year Retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations 48 (3): 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frolic, B. Michael. 1997. State-Led Civil Society. In Civil Society in China, ed. Timothy Brook and B. Michael Frolic. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  18. Gallas, Alexander, Lars Bretthauer, John Kannankulam, and Ingo Stutzle. 2011. Reading Poulantzas. Brecon: The Merlin Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, trans. and ed. Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Gries, Peter Hays. 2004. Popular Nationalism and State Legitimation in China. In State and Society in 21st-Century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation, ed. Peter Hays Gries and Stanley Rosen. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  21. Gwyn, A. Williams. 1960. The Concept of Egemonia in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci: Some Notes on Interpretation. Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (Oct–Dec): 586–599.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Legitimation Problems in the Modern State. In Communication and the Evolution of Society, ed. Jürgen Habermas. London: Heinemann Education Books.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, Stuart. 1980. Nicos Poulantzas: State, Power, Socialism. New Left Review I (119): 60–68.Google Scholar
  24. Hawley, James P. 1980. Antonio Gramsci’s Marxism: Class, State and Work. Social Problems 27 ( 5(June)): 584–600.Google Scholar
  25. Hay, Collin, and Michael Lister. 2006. Introduction: Theories of the State. In The State: Theories and Issues, ed. Colin Hay, Michael Lister, and David Marsh.Google Scholar
  26. He, Baogang. 1997. The Democratic Implications of Civil Society in China. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1977. Gramsci and Political Theory. Marxism Today 21: 205–213.Google Scholar
  28. Holloway, John, and Sol Picciotto. 1977. Capital, Crisis and the State. Capital and Class 2: 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hui, Sio-Ieng Elaine, and King Chi Chris Chan. 2012. The “Harmonious Society” as a Hegemonic Project: Labour Conflicts and Changing Labour Policies in China. Labour, Capital and Society 44 (2): 153–183.Google Scholar
  30. Hunt, Alan. 1993. Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Jessop, Bob. 1982. The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  32. Jessop, Bob. 1985. Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jessop, Bob. 2008. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Laclau, Ernesto. 1982. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, Ching Kwan. 1995. Engendering the Worlds of Labor: Women Workers, Labor Markets, and Production Politics in the South China Economic Miracle. American Sociological Review 60 (3): 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenin, Vladimir Ilʹich. 1969. The State and Revolution. http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch01.htm.
  38. Litowitz, Douglas. 2000. Gramsci, Hegemony, and the Law. Brigham Young University Law Review 2: 515–551.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, James. 2008. Introduction. In The Poulantzas Reader: Marxism, Law and the State, ed. Nicos Poulantzas. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  40. Marx, Karl. 1973. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Survey From Exile: Political Writings, vol. 2, ed. David Fernbach. London: New Left Review.Google Scholar
  41. Marx, Karl. 1974. The Civil War in France. In Survey From Exile: Political Writings, vol. 3, ed. David Fernbach. London: New Left Review.Google Scholar
  42. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1978. The Communist Manifesto. In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Robert Tucker. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Merrington, J. 1968. Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. Socialist Register 5: 145–176.Google Scholar
  44. Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Mouffe, Chantal. 1979. Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In Gramsci Marxist Theory, ed. Chantal Mouffe. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Mouffe, Chantal, and Anne Showstack Sassoon. 1977. Gramsci in France and Italy—A Review of the Literature. Economy and Society 6 (1): 31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Potter, Pitman B. 2004. Legal Reform in China: Institutions, Culture, and Selective Adaptation. Law & Social Inquiry 29 (2): 465–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1967. Marxist Political Theory in Great Britain. New Left Review I (43): 57–74.Google Scholar
  49. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1969. The Problem of the Capitalist State. New Left Review I (58): 67–78.Google Scholar
  50. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1972. The Problem of the Capitalist State. In Ideology in Social Science, ed. R. Blackburn. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  51. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1973a. On Social Class. New Left Review I (78): 27–54.Google Scholar
  52. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1973b. Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Review and Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  53. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  54. Poulantzas, Nicos. 2000. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  55. Poulantzas, Nicos. 2008. The Poulantzas Reader: Marxism, Law and the State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Pun, Ngai. 1999. Becoming Dagongmei (Working Girls): The Politics of Identity and Difference in Reform China. China Journal 42: 1–18.Google Scholar
  57. Pun, Ngai. 2005. Making in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Pun, Ngai, and King Chi Chris Chan. 2008. The Subsumption of Class Discourse in China. boundary 2 35 (2): 75–91.Google Scholar
  59. Salamini, Leonardo. 1974. Gramsci and Marxist Sociology of Knowledge: An Analysis of Hegemony-Ideology-Knowledge. Sociological Quarterly 15 (Summer 1974): 359–380.Google Scholar
  60. Solinger, Dorothy J. 1993. China’s Transients and the State: A Form of Civil Society? Politics & Society 21: 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wallace, Ruth A., and Alison Wolf. 2006. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1986. The Retreat from Class: The New “True” Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  63. Wright, Erik Olin. 1979. Class, Crisis and the State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  64. Wright, Teresa. 2004. Contesting State Legitimacy in the 1990s: The China Democracy Party and the China Labor Bulletin. In State and Society in 21st-Century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation, ed. Peter Hays Gries and Stanley Rosen. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Labor and Employment RelationsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations