Advertisement

Chapter 4: Reconfiguring Sexuality Education as an Assemblage: Exploring Affective Becomings in a Research ‘Classroom’

  • Kathleen Quinlivan
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

Conceptualising my experiences as a researcher working with a group of diverse high school students over six years in focus groups increasingly as sites of sexuality education, I map the ways in which our encounters shifted in ways which enabled an exploration, and in some instances a reconfiguration, of contemporary normalising sexuality and gender politics. This chapter explores the ways in which my experiments with Deleuzo-Guattarian theory (1987) enabling me as a researcher/ teacher to foreground the sex and gender politics of young people’s everyday lives. Working with Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987) inter-related concepts of assemblage and becoming were helpful in connecting our micro-encounters to broader sites of sexuality education affecting the student’s lives, and pedagogically reconceptualising our intra-actions in terms of dynamic and processual lived intra-actions which produced both restrictive and expansive affective and desiring flows. Characterised by a rolling sense of constraint and possibility, I show how moments of ‘becoming other’ emerged for both the students and myself. While pedagogically demanding, I suggest that reconfiguring sexuality education programmes as experimental affective and desiring sites gestures towards some exciting possibilities for engaging otherwise with the ways that normative sex and gender politics are being played out in young people’s lives.

References

  1. Albrecht-Crane, C., & Daryl Slack, J. (2007). Toward a Pedagogy of Affect. In A. Hickey-Moody & P. Malins (Eds.), Deleuzian Encounters. Studies in Contemporary Social Issues (pp. 99–110). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking Inclusion: The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Alldred, P., & David, M. E. (2007). Get Real About Sex: The Politics and Practice of Sex Education. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alldred, P., & Fox, N. (2015). The Sexuality-Assemblages of Young Men: A New Materialist Analysis. Sexualities, 18(8), 905–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, L. (2011). Young People and Sexuality Education: Rethinking Key Debates. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen, L. (2015). The Power of Things! A ‘New’ Ontology of Sexuality at School. Sexualities, 18(8), 941–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Blaise, M. (2013). Activating Micropolitical Practices in the Early Years. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 184–200). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buchanan, I. (2014). Teoría del agenciamiento. Taller a cargo. Lima, Peru: Presentation at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, R. (2009). The Becoming of Bodies: Girls, Images, Experience. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2012). Introduction: Deleuze and Research Methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, B. (2010). The Implications for Qualitative Research Methodology of the Struggle Between the Individualised Subject of Phenomenology and the Emergent Multiplicities of the Poststructuralist Subject: The Problem of Agency. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies, B. (2014). Reading Anger in Early Childhood Intra-actions: A Diffractive Analysis. Qualitative Enquiry, 20(6), 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: The Athione Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of Learning. Media, Architecture, Pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fine, M. (1992). Sexuality, Schooling and Adolescent Females: The Missing Discourse of Desire. In M. Fine (Ed.), Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research (pp. 31–59). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality Education and Desire: Still Missing After All These Years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2013). The Sexuality-Assemblage: Desire, Affect, Anti-humanism. The Sociological Review, 61, 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, J. (2014). Sexuality in School: The Limits of Education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hultman, J. K., & Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2013a). Subjectivity, Affect and Place: Thinking with Deleuze and Guattari’s Body Without Organs to Explore a Young Girl’s Becomings in a Post-industrial Locale. Subjectivity, 6(4), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2013b). Valleys’ Girls: Re-theorising Bodies and Agency in a Semi-rural Post-industrial Locale. Gender and Education, 25(6), 704–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2016). Girls, Camera, (Intra)action: Mapping Posthuman Possibilities in a Diffractive Analysis of Camera Girl Assemblages in Research on Gender, Corporeality and Place. In C. Huia & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 168–185). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, A. (2010). Deleuze and the Girl. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, B., Harrison, L., Ollis, D., Flentje, J., Arnold, P., & Bartholomaeus, C. (2016). ‘It Is Not All About Sex’: Young People’s Views About Sexuality and Relationships Education. Report of Stage 1 of the Engaging Young People in Sexuality Education Research Project. Adelaide: University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Leahy, D. (2009). Disgusting Pedagogies. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies (pp. 172–182). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Leahy, D., Burrows, L., McCuaig, L., Wright, J., & Penny, D. (2016). School Health Education in Changing Times: Curriculum, Pedagogies and Partnerships. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2009). Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-active Pedagogy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2012). A Diffractive and Deleuzian Approach to Analysing Interview Data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2016). Deleuzo-Guattarian Rhizomatics: Mapping the Desiring Forces and Connections Between Educational Practices and the Neurosciences. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 37–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Lesko, N. (2010). Feeling Abstinent? Feeling Comprehensive? Touching the Affects of Sexuality Curricula. Sex Education, 10, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massumi, B. (1992). A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mazzei, L. (2013). Desire Undone: Productions of Privilege, Power and Voice. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 96–110). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pascoe, C. J. (2005). ‘Dude, You’re a Fag’: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse. Sexualities, 8(3), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Quinlivan, K. (2014). “What’s Wrong with Porn?” Engaging with Contemporary Painting to Explore the Commodification of Pleasure in Sexuality Education. In L. Allen, M. L. Rasmussen, & K. Quinlivan (Eds.), The Politics of Pleasure in Sexuality Education: Pleasure Bound (pp. 96–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Quinlivan, K. (2016). ‘Getting It Right’? Mapping Im/possibilities of Race and Gender in the Neoliberal School Based Sexuality Education Assemblage. In L. Allen & M. L. R. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Sexualities Education. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Quinlivan, K., Rasmussen, M., Aspin, C., Allen, L., & Sanjakdar, F. (2014). Crafting the Normative Subject: Queering the Politics of Race in the New Zealand Health Education Classroom. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 393–404.Google Scholar
  41. Rasmussen, M. L., Sanjakdar, F., Aspin, C., Allen, L., & Quinlivan, K. (2011). Sexuality Education in Australia and New Zealand: Responding to Religious and Cultural Difference. In Australian Research Council Discovery Grant, 2011–2012. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Research Council.Google Scholar
  42. Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. (2014). Horse-Girl Assemblages: Towards a Post-Human Cartography of Girls’ Desire in an Ex-mining Valleys Community. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 361–376.Google Scholar
  43. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid Subjectivities? Re-theorizing Teen Girls’ Sexual Cultures in an Era of ‘Sexualization’. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ringrose, J. (2010). Rethinking Gendered Regulations and Resistances in Education. Gender and Education, 22(6), 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond Discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s Schizoanalysis to Explore Affective Assemblages, Heterosexually Striated Space, and Lines of Flight Online and at School. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, Education and Becoming. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.Google Scholar
  47. St. Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian Concepts for Education: The Subject Undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The Posts Continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas, F., & Aggleton, P. (2016). School-Based Sex and Relationships Education: Current Knowledge and Emerging Themes. In V. Sundaram & H. Sauntson (Eds.), Global Perspectives and Key Debates in Sex and Relationships Education: Addressing Issues of Gender, Sexuality, Plurality and Power (pp. 13–29). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of Desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Youdell, D. (2011). School Trouble: Identity, Power and Politics in Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Youdell, D., & Armstrong, F. (2011). A Politics Beyond Subjects: The Affective Choreographies and Smooth Spaces of Schooling. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(3), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Quinlivan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations