Advertisement

Chapter 2: “An Epidemic of Love”: Drawing on Students’ Lived Experiences of Challenging Hetero and Gender Normalcy to Engage with Sexual and Gender Diversity in the Classroom

  • Kathleen Quinlivan
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

This chapter explores how hetero and gender normativity can be challenged by students in schools in schools, and the contributions their activism could make to engaging with contemporary sexuality and gender politics in the sexuality education classroom more fully. I document students’ lived experiences of shifting sexuality and gender politics as members of a Rainbow Diversity group (RDG) group in a co-educational New Zealand high school. Utilising queer theory’s intentions to problematise normalcy I draw on Jose Munoz’s (2009) notion of ‘queer utopia’, which rejects the normative ‘here and now’ (p. 1) to insist on the potentiality for another world. Framing the RDG as a student led ‘classroom’ within their school, I show how the students utilise aesthetics and arts based activism to challenge hetero and homonormativity. Understanding a ‘queer utopia’ (Munoz, 2009) as a critical form of hope that risks disappointment, I discuss the ways in which the group critically grappled with issues of homonormativity and acknowledging difference amongst themselves. This chapter emphasises the important role that student- led initiatives can play as sites of teaching and learning to queerly destabilise hetero and gender normativity within schools. I suggest that engaging with the issues that emerged between the RDG students would make a valuable contribution to sexuality education programmes in classrooms in terms of exploring the complexities of engaging with sexual and gender diversity, and supporting the capacity of students to create everyday social change.

References

  1. Allen, L. (2011). Young People and Sexuality Education: Rethinking Key Debates. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackett, E. (2016). ‘I’m Allowed to Be Angry’: Students Resist Postfeminist Education in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Women’s Studies Journal, 30(2), 38–52.Google Scholar
  4. Britzman, D., & Gilbert, J. (2004). What Will Have Been Said About Gayness in Teacher Education. Teaching Education, 15(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, B. (2009). Introduction. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Pedagogical Encounters (pp. 1–16). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2009). Pedagogical Encounters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. DePalma, R., & Atkinson, E. (2009). Outing Queer into Practice: Problems and Possibilities. In Interrogating Heteronormativity in Primary Schools: The Work of the No-Outsiders Project (pp. 1–6). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  8. Edel, D., Brown, M., & Tolman, D. (2013). Embodying Sexualisation: When Theory Meets Practice in Intergenerational Feminist Activism. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edelman, L. (2004). No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of Learning. New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert, J. (2014). Sexuality in School: The Limits of Education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a Blue Guitar. The Lincoln Center Institute Lectures on Aesthetic Education. New York: Teachers High School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2010). Youth Arts, Place and Differential Becomings of the World. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 24(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2012). Youth, Arts and Education: Reassembling Subjectivity Through Affect. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Inside Out. (2016). Starting and Strengthening Rainbow Diversity Groups. Retrieved from www.insideout.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Starting-and-Strengthening-Rainbow-Diversity-Groups-Digital.pdf
  16. Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2013). Subjectivity, Affect and Place: Thinking with Deleuze and Guattari’s Body Without Organs to Explore a Young Girls Becomings in a Post Industrial Locale. Subjectivity, 4, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lather, P. (2007). Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts Towards a Double(d) Science. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, D. (2010). Popular Culture, the ‘Victim’ Trope and Queer Youth Analytics. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayo, C. (2004). Queering School Communities: Ethical Curiosity and Gay Straight Alliances. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies in Education, 1(3), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayo, C. (2009). Access and Obstacles: Gay-Straight Alliances Attempt to Alter School Communities. In W. Ayers, T. Quinn, & D. Stovall (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice in Education (pp. 319–331). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Munoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nairn, K., & Smith, A. (2003). Taking Students Seriously: Their Rights to Be Safe at School. Gender and Education, 15(1), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quinlivan, K. (2002). Whose Problem Is This? Queerying the Framing of Lesbian and Gay Secondary School Students Within “At Risk” Discourses. In K. H. Robinson, J. Irwin, & T. Ferfolja (Eds.), From Here to Diversity: The Social Impact of Lesbian and Gay Issues in Education in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 17–31). New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  24. Quinlivan, K. (2015). Acknowledging and Working Double Binds: The Im/possible work of a High School Queer Straight Alliance. In A. Gunn & L. Smith (Eds.), Sexual Cultures in Aotearoa/New Zealand Education (pp. 135–149). Dunedin, FL: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Quinlivan, K., Goulter, M., & Caldwell, F. (2010). Diversity Groups as Sites of Learning in New Zealand School and Community Contexts. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Aids Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Rasmussen, M. L. (2006). Becoming Subjects: Sexualities and Secondary Schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rasmussen, M. L. R. (2010). No Outsiders and “The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Child”. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8, 210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rasmussen, M. L. R., Rofes, E., & Talburt, S. (2004). Introduction. In M. L. Rasmussen, E. Rofes, & S. Talburt (Eds.), Youth and Sexualities: Pleasure, Subversion and Insubordination In and Out of Schools (pp. 17–39). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Renold, E. (2017). ‘Feel What I Feel’: Making Da(r)ta with Teen Girls for Creative Activisms on How Sexual Violence Matters. Journal of Gender Studies. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjgs20
  30. Retallack, H., Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2016). ‘Fuck Your Body Image’: Teen Girls’ Twitter and Instagram Feminism In and Around School. In Learning Bodies (pp. 85–103). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Riggs, D. W., & Bartholomaeus, C. (2017). Transgender Young People’s Narratives of Intimacy and Sexual Health: Implications for Sexuality Education. Sex Education. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2017.1355299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2015). Cows, Cabins and Tweets: Posthuman Intra-acting Affect and Feminist Fires in Secondary School. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 220–241). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  33. Schubert, W. (2010). Outside Curricula and Public Pedagogy. In J. Sandlin & J. Burdick (Eds.), Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning Beyond Schooling (pp. 10–19). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Sykes, H. (2011). Hetero-and Homo-normativity: Critical Literacy, Citizenship Education, and Queer Theory. Curriculum Theory, 41(4), 419–432.Google Scholar
  35. Talburt, S. (2009). Toys, Pleasure and the Future. In R. DePalma & E. Atkinson (Eds.), Interrogating Heteronormativity (pp. 85–94). Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  36. Talburt, S., & Rasmussen, M. (2010). ‘After Queer’ Tendencies in Queer Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Todd, S. (2011). Standing at the Crossroads of the Ethical and Political: Education. Feminisms and Narrativity. Presentation at the University of Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
  38. Verner-Chappell, S. (2010). Young People Talk Back: Community Arts as a Public Pedagogy of Social Justice. In J. Sandlin, B. Schutz, & J. Burdick (Eds.), Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning Beyond Schooling (pp. 318–326). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible Bodies, Impossible Selves: Exclusions and Student Subjectivities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Youdell, D. (2011). School Trouble: Identity, Power and Politics in Education. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Quinlivan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations