Profiling Agents and Callers: A Dual Comparison Across Speaker Roles and British versus American English
This chapter attempts to demonstrate how using semi-automated corpus-annotation techniques could “objectify” the evaluation of agent and caller speech in customer contact call centres. This is achieved, in part, by profiling particular speaker or speaker groups through an analysis and comparison of the speech acts and other linguistic features used by Filipino agents and callers from American and British language backgrounds. Results suggest that pragmatics-related features of call centre discourse may be indicative of a speaker’s or speaker group’s performance and language variety. The discussion here demonstrates that it is in fact possible to profile individual speakers or groups in specific ways, as well as to judge their efficiency as communicators, at least to some extent. At the same time, it is evident that the behaviour of the different agents and callers potentially points towards certain preferences in the two varieties of English investigated in this study.
KeywordsCall Centre Syntactic Complexity Discourse Marker Individual Speaker Speaker Group
- Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D., & Hultgren, A. K. (2010). Communication skills in contemporary service workplaces: Some problems. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 41–58). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Cowie, C., & Murty, L. (2010). Researching and understanding accent shifts in Indian call centre agents. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 125–146). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Fischer, K. (Ed.). (2006). Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Forey, G. & Lockwood, J. (Eds.). 2010. Globalization, communication and the workplace: Talking across the world. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Friginal, Eric. (2008). Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies, 10(6), 715–736.Google Scholar
- Hood, S. (2010). Naming and negotiating relationships in call centre talk. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 88–105). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Jucker, A. & Ziv, Y. (Eds.). (1998). Discourse markers: Description and theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Kowtko, J. & Price, P. (1989, October). Data collection and analysis in the air travel planning domain. In Proceedings of DARPA speech and natural language workshop.Google Scholar
- Leech, Geoffrey & Weisser, Martin. (2013). The SPAADIA Annotation Scheme. Available from: http://martinweisser.org/publications/SPAADIA_Annotation_Scheme.pdf.
- Leech, G., Weisser, M., Wilson, A., & Grice, M. (2000). Survey and guidelines for the representation and annotation of dialogue. In D. Gibbon, I. Mertins, & R. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of multimodal and spoken language systems (pp. 1–101). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Lockwood, J. (2010). What causes communication breakdown in the call centres? The discrepancies in the communications training and research. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 204–220). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Lockwood, J., Forey, G., & Price, H. (2008). English in the Philippine call centres and BPO operations: Issues, opportunities and research. In M. L. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 219–241). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- W3C. (2010). XML Technology – W3C. Online at http://www.w3.org/standards/xml/. Accessed 10 Apr 2015.
- Weisser, M. (2014a). The Dialogue Annotation and Research Tool (DART) (Version 1.0) [Computer Software]. Downloadable from http://martinweisser.org/ling_soft.html#DART.
- Weisser, M. (2014b). The DART manual: Application manual to accompany the Dialogue Annotation & Research Tool. Available from http://martinweisser.org/ling_soft.html#DART.
- Weisser, M. (2014c). Speech act annotation. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 84–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Weisser, M. (forthcoming). DART—The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
- Weisser, M. & Bolton, K. (2011). The English of Philippine call centre agents. Paper presented at the IAWE 2011 Conference, Monash University, Melbourne, on 24 Nov 2011.Google Scholar