Environmental Management Practices and Performance of International Suppliers Located in China: How Does Relationship Learning Matter?

  • Esther Ling-yee Li
Part of the AIB Southeast Asia book series (AIBSEAR)


Environmentalism and sustainability requirements have become increasingly important issues of concern in Asian economies. Increasing government regulations and consumer and activist movements have repeatedly called for greener supply chain activities. However, the extant studies examined only the direct effect of environmental management practices on a firm’s competitiveness and performance and hence ignored the intervening learning processes. Framed within the resource-based view of the firm, the current inquiry investigates environmental management practices as a kind of resource inputs accounting for an international supplier firm’s relational learning to address its international buyers’ environmental concerns, which in turn fosters competitive outcomes. The resultant findings clearly show that learning from foreign partners and collaborating with them can upgrade the capabilities of Chinese firms for sustainable development.


Environmental sustainability Relationship learning Green supply chain 


  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectation, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodur, M. (1994). Foreign market indicators, structural resources and marketing strategies as determinants of export performance. Advances in International Marketing, 6, 183–205.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1975). Strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. T. (1972). Is pollution profitability? Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.Google Scholar
  9. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1075–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, K. H., & Metcalf, R. W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control record and financial performance revisited. Accounting Review, 55, 168–177.Google Scholar
  13. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost competitiveness: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2011). Towards a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dyer, J. (2000). Collaborative advantage: Winning through extended enterprise supplier networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(Special Issue), 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992–present: A review. Journal of Management, 33, 637–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Floyd, D. W., Vonhof, S. L., & Seyfang, H. E. (2001). Forest sustainability: A discussion guide for professional resource managers. Journal of Forestry, 99(2), 8–15.Google Scholar
  21. Fogler, H. R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 155–160.Google Scholar
  22. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  24. Geffen, C. A., & Rothenberg, S. (2000). Suppliers and environmental innovation: The automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20, 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Handfield, R. B., Walton, S. V., Seeger, L. K., & Melnyk, S. A. (1997). Green value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, J. S., Douglas, B. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 58–74.Google Scholar
  27. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  28. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt, S. D. and Davis, D. F. (2008). Grounding Supply Chain Management In Resource-Advantage Theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44,10–21.Google Scholar
  31. Kaynak, E., & Kuan, W. (1993). Environment, strategy, structure, and performance in the context of export activity: An empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 27, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klassen, R. D., & Vachon, S. (2003). Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: The impact of plant-level environmental investment. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lao, Y., Hong, P., & Rao, S. S. (2010). Supply management, supply flexibility, and performance outcomes: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, K. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? Management Decision, 47(7), 1101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, S. M., Kim, S. T., & Choi, D. (2012). Green supply chain management and organizational performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(8), 1148–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, S. Y., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small- and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 17(6), 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manuj, I., and Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223.Google Scholar
  39. Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, T., & de Matta, R. (2008). A global supply chain profit maximization and transfer pricing model. Journal of Channel Logistics, 29(1), 175–99.Google Scholar
  41. Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nehrt, C. (1998). Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23,77–97.Google Scholar
  43. Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. E. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply chain management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. (2007). Environmental uncertainty and strategic supply management: A resource dependency perspective and performance implications. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(3), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environmental competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sambharya, R., & Banerji, K. (2006). The effect of Keiretsu affiliation and resource dependencies on supplier firm performance in the Japanese automobile industry. Management International Review, 46(1), 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Selnes, F., & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing, 67, 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spicer, B. H. (1978). Investigators corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53, 94–111.Google Scholar
  53. Stead, W. E., & Stead, J. G. (1995). An empirical investigation of sustainability strategy implementation in industrial organizations. In D. Collins & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, (supplement 1) (pp. 43–46). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ueltschy, L., Ueltschy, M., & Fachinelli, A. (2007). The impact of culture on the generation of trust in global supply chain relationships. The Marketing Management Journal, 17(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  55. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wittmann, C. M., Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2009). Explaining alliance success: Competences, resources, relational factors, and resource-advantage theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zacharia, Z., Nix, N., & Lusch, R. (2009). An analysis of supply chain collaborations and their effect on performance outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu, Q. H., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esther Ling-yee Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marketing and International BusinessLingnan UniversityHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations