Asian Businesses in a Turbulent Environment pp 65-91

Part of the AIB Southeast Asia book series (AIBSEAR) | Cite as

Cultural Distance, Host Regulatory Quality, and Location Choice: A Hierarchical Analysis of Chinese Multinationals

Chapter

Abstract

The research presented in this chapter investigates the effect of both host and home institutional factors on emerging market multinational corporations’ choice of location for overseas investments. Drawing from prospect theory and recent theoretical development, we propose that cultural distance and host regulatory quality contribute to the attractiveness of a country, while home government relationship moderates the effect of host regulatory quality, and such effects vary across countries at different stages of economic development. Based on the data from overseas subsidiaries of Chinese multinational corporations, both cultural distance and host regulatory quality positively affect location choice. For less developed countries, there is a negative interaction between cultural distance and host regulatory quality, and home government relationship positively moderates the effect of host regulatory quality.

References

  1. Aggarwal, R., & Agmon, T. (1990). The international success of developing country firms: Role of government-directed comparative advantage. Management International Review, 30(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
  2. Ambler, T., & Witzel, M. (2004). Doing business in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benito, R. G., & Gripsrud, G. (1992). The expansion of foreign direct investments: Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process? Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bevan, A., Estrin, S., & Meyer, K. (2004). Institution building and the integration of Eastern Europe in international production. International Business Review, 13(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). The export behavior of smaller-sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (2002). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  10. Buckley, P. J., Cross, A. R., Tan, H., Xin, L., & Voss, H. (2008). Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward direct investment. Management International Review, 48(6), 715–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckley, P. J., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2007). Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1069–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley, P. J., & Hashai, N. (2004). A global system view of firm boundaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(2), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Beule, F., & Duanmu, J.-L. (2012). Locational determinants of internationalization: A firm-level analysis of Chinese and Indian acquisitions. European Management Journal, 30(3), 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. (2010). Institutional and transaction cost determinants of Turkish MNCs’ location choice. International Marketing Review, 27(3), 272–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2012). Institutions and FDI location choice: The role of cultural distances. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international business: A restatement and extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunning, J. H. (2006). Towards a new paradigm of development: Implications for the determinants of international business activity. Transnational Corporations, 15(1), 173–228.Google Scholar
  21. Dunning, J. H. (2009). Location and the multinational enterprise: Retrospective thoughts. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erdener, C., & Shapiro, D. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese family enterprises and Dunning’s eclectic MNE paradigm. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans, W., Lane, H. W., & O’Grady, S. (1992). Border crossings: Doing business in the US. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flores, R., & Aguilera, R. V. (2007). Globalization and location choice: An analysis of U.S. multinational firms in 1980 and. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(7), 1187–1210.Google Scholar
  26. Galan, J. I., Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Zuniga-Vincente, J. A. (2007). Factors determining the location decisions of Spanish MNCs: An analysis based on the investment development path. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 975–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaur, A., & Kumar, V. (2010). Internationalization of emerging market firms: A case for theoretical extension. In D. Timothy, P. Torben, & T. Laszlo (Eds.), The past, present and future of international business & management (Advances in International Management, Vol. 23, pp. 603–627). China: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. (1999). An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grosse, R., & Trevino, L. J. (2005). New institutional economics and FDI location in Central and Eastern Europe. Management International Review, 45(2), 123–145.Google Scholar
  30. Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoshi, I., Balcerowicz, E., & Balcerowicz, L. (2003). Barriers to entry and growth of new firms in early transition: A comparative study of Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Albania, and Lithuania. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jiang, L., Chen, Q., & Liu, Y. (2010). FDI and the change of the Chinese culture. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1993). Management of internationalization. In L. Zan, S. Zambon, & A. M. Pettigrew (Eds.), Perspectives on strategic change. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 159–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kang, Y., & Jiang, F. (2012). FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karouni, I. E. (2009). Institutional change as cultural change: An illustration by Chinese postsocialist transformation. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(7), 762–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1993). Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, 1, 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuncic, A. (2012). Regulatory quality database: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (Working Paper No. 457).Google Scholar
  45. Kuo, C.-L., & Fang, W. (2009). Psychic distance and FDI location choice: Empirical examination of Taiwanese firms in China. Asia Pacific Management Review, 14(1), 85–106.Google Scholar
  46. Kwok, C. C. Y., & Solomon, T. (2006). The MNC as an Agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo, Y., & Mezias, J. M. (2002). Liabilities of foreignness: Concepts, constructs, and consequences. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Makino, S., Lau, C.-M., & Yeh, R.-S. (2002). Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malhotra, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2011). Simultaneous determination of optimal cultural distance and market potential in international market entry. International Marketing Review, 28(6), 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mathews, J. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mauro, P. (1997). The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure: A cross-country analysis. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the global economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  54. Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges. Economics and Politics, 2(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. (2008). Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nachum, L., & Wymbs, C. (2005). Product differentiation, external economies and MNE location choices: M&As in global cities. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Naghavi, A., & Leahy, D. (2010). Intellectual property rights and entry into a foreign market: FDI vs. Joint Ventures. Review of International Economics, 18(4), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2000). Industrial development, globalization and multinational enterprises: New realities for developing countries. Oxford Development Studies, 28(2), 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Grady, S., & Lane, H. W. (1996). The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peng, M. W. (2000). Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Peng, M. W., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Scott, W. R. (2002). The changing world of Chinese enterprises: An institutional perspective. In A. S. Tsui & C. Lau (Eds.), The management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sullivan, D., & Bauerschmidt, A. (1990). Incremental internationalization: A test of Johanson and Vahlne’s thesis. Management International Review, 30(1): 19–30.Google Scholar
  68. Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Ren, B., & Yan, D. (2012). A comparative ownership advantage framework for cross-border M&As: The Rise of Chinese and Indian MNCs. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, D. E., & Grosse, R. (2001). Country-of-origin determinants of foreign direct investment in an emerging market: The case of Mexico. Journal of International Management, 7(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  72. Wernick, D. A., Haar, J., & Singh, S. (2009). Do governing institutions affect foreign direct investment inflows? New evidence from emerging economies. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 1(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Xu, Y., & Li, H. (2002). From politics to markets: A case study of Chinese firms’ strategic adaptation. In A. S. Tsui & C. Lau (Eds.), The management of enterprises in The People’s Republic of China. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  74. Yeoh, P.-L. (2011). Location choice and the internationalization sequence: Insights from Indian pharmaceutical companies. International Marketing Review, 28(3), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yin, E., & Bao, Y. (2006). The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: An empirical analysis of the “supplier-side individual level” and “recipient-side” factors. Management International Review, 46(3), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yuan, L., & Pangarkar, N. (2010). Inertia versus mimicry in location choices by Chinese multinationals. International Marketing Review, 27(3), 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and International BusinessLingnan UniversityHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationGuangdong University of Finance and EconomicsGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations