Advertisement

Conclusions

  • María Bustelo
  • Lucy Ferguson
  • Maxime Forest
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series

Abstract

As set out in the introductory chapter, this book is an attempt to offer a critical reflection on the politics of feminist knowledge transfer, bringing together analytical and theoretical work on gender expertise and gender training. Grounded in both the theory of feminist knowledge transfer and experiences of gender training and gender expertise, the chapters elaborate on emerging bodies of literature to advance further what have, to date, been primarily practice-oriented debates. This book articulates an understanding of processes of feminist knowledge transfer as pursuing a transformative agenda, rooted in a structural approach to gender inequality. Feminist knowledge is framed as situated, depending on the standpoints of different knowers. These standpoints do not only result from different disciplinary backgrounds and status. They also reflect different knowledge transfer scenarios — for example, EU member states and countries of the Global South. This book also articulates an explicit acknowledgement of the political nature of the contexts (cultural, institutional, or organizational) in which this knowledge is being transferred and of the potential for contestation. All chapters embrace a reflexive approach, adopting varying degrees of critique towards the biases and limitations this transfer process can reveal. Indeed, the very notion of transfer has been placed under scrutiny, in order to challenge hierarchies of knowledges and place increased emphasis on the dynamic and participatory nature of such a process. For this reason, this book also addresses resistances and contestation as inherent to transferring knowledge from a feminist perspective.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bettio, Francesca, Marcella Corsi, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Antigone Lyberaki, Manuela Samek Lodovici, and Alina Verashchagina (2012) Tile Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men and on Gender Equality Policies. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Bustelo, Marfa (2014) “Three Decades of State Feminism and Gender Equality Policies in Multi-Governed Spain”, Sex Roles, DOl 10.1007/slll99–014-0381–9.Google Scholar
  3. Haraway, Donna (2004) “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”, in Sandra G. Harding (ed.) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. 1st Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
  4. Harding, Sandra G. (ed.) (2004) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. 1st Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Jacquot, Sophie (2010) “The Paradox of Gender Mainstreaming: The Unanticipated Effects of New Modes of Governance in the Gender Equality Domain”, West European Politics, 33(1), 118–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kriszan, Andrea, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires (2012) “European Equality Regimes: Institutional Change and Political Intersectionality”, in Andrea Kriszan, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires (eds.) Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Prügl, Elisabeth (2011) “Diversity Management and Gender Malnstreamlng as Technologies of Government”, Politics and Gender, 7, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sénac, Réjane (2012) L’Invention de la diversité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  9. —— (2015) L’égalité sous conditions: genre, parité, diversité. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Bustelo
  • Lucy Ferguson
  • Maxime Forest

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations