Advertisement

Gender Training as a Tool for Transformative Gender Mainstreaming: Evidence from Sweden

  • Anne-Charlott Callerstig
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series

Abstract

Gender training is widely seen as necessary for non-gender experts to be able to conduct gender impact analysis and to suggest adequate measures for gender mainstreaming (Council of Europe, 1998). Gender training is also considered key to minimizing the risk of resistance in terms of the implementation of gender equality policies (Halford, 1992). Major training efforts have subsequently been common in connection with gender mainstreaming initiatives. The heavy reliance on gender training as a driver for change in gender mainstreaming strategies, together with reports of difficulties in achieving envisioned policy and organizational changes, raises questions about the potential of gender training as a policy instrument for implementing gender equality policies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, Lena (2000) Att återställa ordningen. Könsmönster och föjrändring i arbets-organisationer. Umeå: Boréa BokförlagGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, Susanne, Eva Amundsdotter, Marita Svensson, and Ann-Sofie Däldehög (2009) Middle managers as Change Agents. Stockholm/Hudiksvall: Stockholms University/Fiber Optic Valley.Google Scholar
  3. Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Ray C. Rist, and Evert Vedung (eds.) (2003) Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  4. Billig, Michael, Susan Condor, Derek Edwards, Mike Gane, David Middleton, and Alan Radley (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Borchorst, Anette (1999) “Den institusjonaliserte likestilling: Hvad er det vi studerer?”, in Christina Bergqvist, Ann-Dorte Christensen, Anette Borchorst, Viveca Ramstedt-Silén, Nina Raaum, and A. Styrkärsdottir (eds.) Likestilte demokratier? Kjønn og politikk i Norden. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 151–156.Google Scholar
  6. Callerstig, Anne-Charlott (2014) Making Equality Work: Ambiguities, Conflicts and Change Agents in the Implementation of Equality Policies in Public Sector Organisations. Doctoral Dissertation, Linköping University.Google Scholar
  7. Callerstig, Anne-Charlott and Kristina Lindholm (2011) “The Contradictory Work with Gender Mainstreaming”, Tidskrift for genusvetenskap (TGV), 2–3, 79–96. English translation of article.Google Scholar
  8. —— (2013) “Effects of Gender Mainstreaming”, in L. Svensson, Lennart, Göran Brulin, Sven Jansson, and Karin Sjöberg (eds.) Capturing Effects in Programmes and Projects. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Europe (1998) Recommendation No. R (98) 14 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Gender Mainstreaming. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlerup, Drude and Lenita Freidenvall (2005) “Quotas as a ‘Fast track’ to Equal Representation for Women”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7 (1), 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly, Mary (2005) “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice”, Social Politics, 12(3), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, John (1989) Demokrati och utbildning. Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  13. Elkjaer, Bente (2001) “The Learning Organisation: An Undelivered Promise”, Management Learning, 32(4), 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellström, Eva, Bodil Ekholm, and Per-Erik Ellström (2008) “Two Types of Learning Environment: Enabling and Constraining A Study of Care Work”, Journal of Work place Learning, 20(2), 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellström, Per-Erik (2010) “Organisational Learning”, in Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, and Barry McGaw (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol. 1. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engeström, Yrjö (1996) “Development as Breaking Away and Opening Up. A Challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget”, Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126–132.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Sweden (2007) Gender Mainstreaming Manual Gender Equality in Public Services. SOU 2007:15. Stockholm: Swedish Government Official Reports.Google Scholar
  18. Hafner-Burton, Emile M. and Mark A. Pollack (2009) “Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union: Getting the Incentives Right”, Comparative European Politics, 21(7), 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halford, Susan (1992) “Feminist Change in a Patriarchal Organisation: The Experience of Women’s Initiatives in Local Government and Implications for Feminist Perspectives on State Institutions”, in Michael Savage and Anne Witz (eds.) Gender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 155–185.Google Scholar
  20. Hearn, Jeff (2012) “Contextualising Gender Mainstreaming: Text, Context, Subtext”, in Kristina Lindholm (ed.) Gender Mainstreaming in Public Sector Organisations: Policy Implications and Practical Application. Lund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
  21. Jahan, Rounaq (1995) The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  22. Kemp, René and Rifka Weehuizen (2005) Policy Learning: What Does It Mean and How Can We Study It? Innovation in the Public Sector. Oslo: Nordisk Institutt for Studier av Innovasjon, forskning og utdanning – STEP.Google Scholar
  23. Kvale, Steinar (1997) Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  24. Lascoumes, Pierre and Patrick Le Gales (2007) “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments — From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo (eds.) (2009) The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, Patricia Y. (2006) “Practicing Gender at Work”, Gender, Work & Organization, 13(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nentwich, Julia (2006) “Changing Gender: The Discursive Construction of Equal Opportunities”, Gender, Work & Organization, 13(6), 499–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olofsdotter Stensöta, Helena (2009) Jämställdhetsintegrering i statliga myndigheters verksamhet. Hur långt har myndigheterna nått? Vad beror det på? Hur kan arbetet utvecklas vidare? JÄMI 2/09 Rapport. Göteborg: Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  29. —— (2010) Processer i arbetet med jämställdhetsintegrering. Ett sam tal med 10 myndigheter. Göteborg: Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  30. Rubery, Jill, Hugo Figueiredo, Mark Smith, Damian Grimshaw, and Colette Fagan (2004) “The Ups and Downs of European Gender Equality Policy”, Industrial Relations Journal, 35(6), 603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sabatier, Paul A. (1993) “Policy Change Over a Decade or More”, in Paul A. Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith (eds.) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
  32. Sainsbury, Diane and Christina Bergqvist (2009) “The Promise and Pitfalls of Gender Mainstreaming: The Swedish Case”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11(2), 216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sannerstedt, Anders (2001) “Implementering — hur politiska beslut genomförs i praktiken”, in Bo Rothstein (ed.) Politik som organisation — förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem. Stockholm: SNS förlag, pp. 18–48.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, Anne and Helen Ingram (1990) “Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools”, The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Svensson, Lennart, Per-Erik Ellström, and Göran Brulin (2007) “Introduction: On Interactive Research”, International Journal of Action Research, 3(3), 233–249.Google Scholar
  36. Timmers, Tanya M., Tineke M. Willemsen, and Kea G. Tijdens (2010) “Gender Diversity Policies in Universities: A Multi-perspective Framework of Policy Measures”, Higher Education, 59, 719–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Doelen, Frans C. J. (2005) “The ‘Give-and-Take’ Packaging of Policy Instruments: Optimizing Legitimacy and Effectiveness”, in Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Ray C. Rist, and Evert Vedung (eds.) Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction, pp. 129–148.Google Scholar
  38. Vedung, Evert (1991) Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Charlott Callerstig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations