‘At-Risk’ Youth Sport Programmes: Another Way of Regulating Boys?

  • Rachael Hutchesson
  • Rylee A. Dionigi
  • Kristina Gottschall


Community youth sport programmes often target boys who are considered ‘at-risk’ of failing at school or not transitioning to an ‘ideal’ adulthood, with the assumption that sport will ‘save them from social alienation’. In this chapter, we extend literature that examines sport programmes as a form of governmentality. We show how on the one hand such programmes reinforce the need for self-regulation among youth, and on the other hand produce an attraction to certain aspects of being a young person ‘at-risk’ (where it appears the more ‘at-risk’ you are the more likely you are to become a ‘famous’ sportsperson). We draw on ethnographic data collected from seven 13–15-year-old boys (including two Indigenous Australian and two Maori) involved in a regional New South Wales Police-run community-based Youth ‘At-Risk’ Programme. This programme aimed to improve relationships between local police and young people who had previous involvement in minor criminal activity. In this context, sport, rather than educational success, is positioned as a ‘way out’ of social marginalisation for young males, especially Indigenous boys, where the overrepresentation of Indigenous men in popular sports, such as rugby league, can establish desirable future selves. In other words, the very programmes that are designed to counter ‘risk’ through sport can work to maintain, create or celebrate risk, making participants feel even more alienated and disengaged from school and/or the workforce when they step outside of the sport programme and return to these ‘normalising’ contexts.


  1. AAP. (2013, June 11). NRL Origin player James Tamou arrested for drink-driving. The Australian.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, K., & Mendick, H. (2012). Keeping it real? Social class, young people and ‘authenticity’ in reality TV. Sociology, 47, 460–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamblett, L. (2011). Straight-line stories: Representations and indigenous Australian identities in sports discourses. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 5–20.Google Scholar
  4. Besley, T. (2010). Governmentality of youth: Managing risky subject. Policy Futures in Education, 8, 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessant, J. (2001). From sociology of deviance to sociology of risk: Youth homelessness and the problem of empiricism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coalter, F. (2011). Sport development’s contribution to social policy objectives: The difficult relationship between politics and evidence. In B. Houlihan & M. Green (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport development. London: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Ltd).Google Scholar
  7. Colthart, A. (1996). At risk youth participating in sport and recreation. Youth Studies Australia, 15, 31–37.Google Scholar
  8. Crabbe, T. (2007). Reaching the ‘hard to reach’: Engagement, relationships building and social control in sport based social inclusion work. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curran A (2010) The construction of at-risk youth: A qualitative study of community-based youth-serving agencies. Master of Arts, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.Google Scholar
  10. de St Croix, T. (2010). Youth work and the surveillance state. In J. Batsleer & B. Davies (Eds.), What is youth work? Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Culture and the Arts. (2010). Creative connections: An arts in education framework 2010–2014. Department of Culture and the Arts: WA.Google Scholar
  12. Dreezen, C. (1992). Intersections: Community arts and education collaborations. Amherst: Massachusetts University.Google Scholar
  13. Feinstein, L., Bynner, J., & Duckworth, K. (2007). Young people’s leisure contexts and their relation to adult outcomes. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson, S. (2009). Code of silence [Online]. Four Corners. Retrieved from
  15. Foster, C. (2013, May 19). Investing in Aboriginal youth will pay huge dividends. The Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  17. Fraser-Thomas, J., Cote, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson, R., & Anderson, M. (2008). Touching the void: Arts education research in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 28, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gould, D., & Carson, S. (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haudenhuyse, R., Theeboom, M., & Nols, Z. (2013). Sports-based interventions for socially vulnerable youth: Towards well-defined interventions with easy-tofollow outcomes? International Review for the Sociology of Sport Journal, 48, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, arts, and education: Ressambling subjectivity through affect. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Holt, N. (2008). Positive youth development through sport. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hutchesson, R. (2014). Living the label: Youth work, young people, being ‘at-risk’ and community-based (arts/sports) programs. PhD thesis, Charles Sturt Uiversity.Google Scholar
  24. Kelly, L. (2011). ‘Social inclusion’ through sports-based interventions? Critical Social Policy, 31, 126–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, P. (1998). Risk and the regulation of youth(ful) identities in an age of manufactured uncertainty. PhD thesis, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, P. (1999). ‘Wild and tame zones’: Regulating the transitions of youth at risk. Journal of Youth Studies, 2, 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly, P. (2007). Governing individualized risk biographies: New class intellectuals and the problem of youth at-risk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laurendeau, J. (2008). Gendered risk regimes: A theoretical consideration of edgework and gender. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lemeke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyng, S. (2005). Edgework: The sociology of risk-taking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lyng, S., & Matthews, R. (2007). Risk, edgework, and masculinities. In K. Hannah-Moffat & P. O’Mally (Eds.), Gendered risks. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Martino, W. (2003). ‘We just get fired up’: Indigenous boys, masculinities and schooling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24, 159–174.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, W. (2005). Adolescents on the edge: The sensual side of delinquency. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The sociology of risk-taking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Morris, L., Sallybanks, J., Willis, K., & Makkai, T. (2003). No. 249 sport, physical activity and antisocial behaviour in youth. Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  35. Nichols, G. (2005). Sport and crime reduction : The role of sports in tackling youth crime. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. NSW Police Service. (2005). NSW police service youth policy statement [Online]. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from
  37. Ord, J. (2008). A curriculum for youth work. Youth Studies Australia, 27, 16–24.Google Scholar
  38. Proundman, D. (2009, December 16). Newcastle knights star Danny Wicks charged by police. The Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
  39. Saltmarsh, S., & Youdell, D. (2004). ‘Special sport’ for misfits & losers: Educational triage and the constitution of schooled subjectivities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8, 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spaaij, R. (2009). Sport as a vehicle for social mobility and regulation of disadvantaged urban youth: Lessons from Rotterdam. International Review for the Sociology of Sport Journal, 44, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tacon, R. (2007). Football and social inclusion: Evaluating social policy. Managing Leisure, 12, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. te Riele, K. (2004). Youth transition in Australia: Challenging assumptions of linearity and choice. The Journal of Youth Studies, 7, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, G. (2006). The mass production of celebrity ‘Celetoids’, reality TV and the ‘demotic turn’. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachael Hutchesson
    • 1
  • Rylee A. Dionigi
    • 2
  • Kristina Gottschall
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Teacher EducationCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia
  2. 2.School of Exercise Science, Sport and HealthCharles Sturt UniversityPort MacquarieAustralia
  3. 3.School of Indigenous Australian StudiesCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations