Advertisement

An Uneven Playing Field: Talent Identification Systems and the Perpetuation of Participation Biases in High Performance Sport

  • Nick Wattie
  • Joseph Baker
Chapter

Abstract

Participation in sport is often held up as an ideal activity for the development of productive youth, minimization of disease risk and maximizing quality of life. Unfortunately, there is overwhelming support for the conclusion that sport and athlete development systems perpetuate systematic biases affecting who has access to sporting opportunities. In particular, several biases emerge from talent identification practices that target those at young ages and from environmental constraints that similarly influence young athletes’ development. In this chapter, we use the theory of Life Cycle Skill Formation (LCSF; Cunha and Heckman, Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738–782, 2008; Cunha et al., Handbook of the economics of education. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006) to review three significant biases on athlete development. Moreover, we will highlight several avenues that might improve rates of sport participation and identify several areas where future work is necessary.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for the writing of this chapter was provided through a research grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC Grant 30-2014-00885).

References

  1. Baker, J., Cobley, S., Montelpare, W. J., Wattie, N., & Faught, B. E. (2010). Exploring proposed mechanisms of the relative age effect in Canadian minor hockey. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 41, 148–159.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J., & Horton, S. (2004). A review of primary and secondary influences on sport expertise. High Ability Studies, 15, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, J., Schorer, J., Cobley, S., Schimmer, G., & Wattie, N. (2009). Circumstantial development and athletic excellence: The role of birth date and birth place. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bale, J. (2003). Sports geography. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Beamish, R. (1990). The persistence of inequality: An analysis of participation patterns among Canada’s high performance athletes. International Review for Sociology of Sport, 25, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, K., & Parcels, J. (2013). Selling the dream: How hockey parents and their kids are paying the price for our national obsession. Toronto: Viking.Google Scholar
  7. Canadian Heritage. (2013). Sport participation 2010 (Catalogue No. CH24-1/2012E-PDF). ISBN: 978-1-100-21561-7. Retrieved November 26, 2014, from http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/434212/publication.html
  8. Carlson, R. C. (1988). The socialization of elite tennis players in Sweden: An analysis of player’s backgrounds and development. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Human capital policy. In J. J. Heckman, A. B. Krueger, & B. M. Friedman (Eds.), Inequality in America: What role for human capital policies? Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, E., Matthews, A., & Boyce, W. (2002). Socioeconomic differences in children’s health: How and why do these relationships change with age? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 295–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual age-grouping and athlete : Development: A meta analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Medicine, 39, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, M. F., & Buller, J. R. (2003). Social exclusion from high-performance sport: Are all talented youth sports people being given an equal opportunity of reaching the Olympic podium? Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27, 420–442.Google Scholar
  13. Côté, J., MacDonald, D. J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2006). When size matters: Birthplace effects on the development of expertise. Journal of Sport Science, 24, 1065–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunha, J., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., Lochner, J., & Masterov, D. V. (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 697–812). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Curtis, J. E., & Birch, J. S. (1987). Size of community of origin and recruitment to professional and Olympic hockey in North America. Sociology of Sport Journal, 4, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delorme, N., & Raspaud, M. (2009). The relative age effect in young French basketball players: A study on the whole population. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport, 19, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraser-Thomas, J., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2008). Understanding dropout and prolonged engagement in adolescent competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodger, K., Gorely, T., Lavallee, D., & Harwood, C. (2007). Burnout in sport: A systematic review. Sport Psychologist, 21, 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hancock, D. J., Starkes, J. L., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2015). The relative age effect in female gymnasts: A flip-flop phenomenon. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 46, 714–725.Google Scholar
  21. Hancock, D., Ste-Marie, D. M., & Young, B. W. (2013). Coach selections and the relative age effect in male youth ice hockey. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helsen, W. F., Baker, J., Dieleman, A., Schorer, J., Starkes, J. L., Steingröver, C., & Wattie, N. (2016). The relative age effect in youth chess competition. High Ability Studies, 27, 211–221.Google Scholar
  24. MacDonald, D. J., & Baker, J. (2013). Circumstantial development: Birthdate and birthplace effects on athlete development. In J. Côté & R. Lidor (Eds.), Conditions of children’s talent development in sport (pp. 197–208). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.Google Scholar
  25. MacDonald, D. J., Cheung, M., Côté, J., & Abernethy, B. (2009). Place but not date of birth influences the development and emergence of athletic talent in American football. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond-effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsh, H. W., & Perry, C. (2005). Self-concept contributes to winning gold medals: Causal ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., et al. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to the critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Musch, J., & Grondin, S. (2001). Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: A review of the relative age effect in sport. Developmental Review, 21, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rooney, J. F., Jr. (1969). Up from the mines and out from the prairies: Some geographical implications of football. Geographical Review, 59, 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Statistics Canada. (2014). Table 111-0008—Neighbourhood income and demographics, taxfilers and dependents with income by total income, sex and age group, annual (number unless otherwise noted), CANSIM (database). Retrieved November 26, 2014, from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=1110008&paSer=&pattern=&stByVal=1&p1=1&p2=37&tabMode=dataTable&csid=
  32. Wattie, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015). The relative age effect in sport: A developmental systems model. Sports Medicine, 45, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wattie, N., Tietjens, M., Schorer, J., Cobley, S., Baker, J., & Kurz, D. (2014). Relative age-related participation and dropout trends in German youth sports clubs. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, S213–S220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White, P., & McTeer, W. (2012). Socioeconomic status and sport participation at different developmental stages during childhood and youth: Multivariate analyses using Canadian national survey data. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29, 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Wattie
    • 1
  • Joseph Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.OshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations