Advertisement

The Gay Games, Safe Spaces and the Promotion of Sport for All?

  • Chelsea Litchfield
  • Jaquelyn Osborne
Chapter

Abstract

In the early 1980s, the creation of the Gay Games and other sporting events for gay and lesbian identified athletes offered an opportunity for such athletes to participate in sports, supposedly free from sexual discrimination. The Gay Games is based on participatory discourses whereby everyone who enters and is allowed to participate, regardless of age, sexuality, race or sporting ability. Notably, the Gay Games culture is often lauded by participants and this event provides a space for participants to compete and socialise and make new friends with like-minded people. Additionally, the Gay Games provides a ‘safe space’ for participants where they do not have to ‘manage’ their identity as gay or lesbian. This sub-culture is examined in this chapter by providing an analysis of the experiences of Australian lesbian-identified hockey and soccer players and their Gay Games participation. Alongside these women’s experiences, this chapter also provides a critique of the ‘accessibility’ of the Gay Games. This accessibility includes both cultural and financial critiques. The cost of entering events at the Gay Games are high; in fact, all participants must pay both a ‘base rate’ for entry into the Games and a cost per sport in which they participate. On top of this expense, the travel costs to attend the Games are substantial and often require international flights and accommodation. Consequently, a large percentage of participants at the Games are middle-class, middle-age to older athletes. Therefore, while the Games provide an affirming space for a number of gay and lesbian participants, a deeper critique of the Games uncovers that accessibility for all is not necessarily the case. In other words, these events are simultaneously inclusive and exclusive, especially in relation to class, sexuality and discrimination.

References

  1. Davidson, J. (1996). Lesbians and the vancouver gay games. Canadian Women Studies, 16(2), 77–79.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, J. (2002). The ‘pay’ games: The commodification of the gay games and cultural events. Abstract presented at the 10th Canadian Congress on Leisure Research. Retrieved May 2017, from http://lin.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/CCLR10-21.pdf
  3. Davidson, J. (2013). Sporting Homonationalisms: Sexual exceptionalism, queer privilege, and the 21st century international lesbian and gay sport movement. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Federation of Gay Games Website. (2017). Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.gaygames.org
  5. Griffin, P. (1998). Strong women, deep closets: Lesbians and homophobia in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  6. Hargreaves, J. (1994). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hargreaves, J. (2000). Heroines of sport: The politics of difference and identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hillier, L. (2005). Safe spaces: The upside of the image problem for same sex attracted young women playing Australian rules football. Football Studies, 8(2), 51–64.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffreys, S. (1993). The lesbian heresy. North Melbourne: Spinifex.Google Scholar
  10. Krane, V., Barber, H., & McClung, L. (2002). Social psychological benefits of gay games participation: A social identity theory explanation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lenskyj, H. J. (2003). Out on the field: Gender, sport and sexualities. Ontario, Canada: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  12. Litchfield, C. (2011). Finding safe and affirming spaces in women’s field hockey. The International Journal of Sport and Society, 3(2), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Litchfield, C. (2012). Sexual diversity: Inclusiveness in women’s club level sport. PhD dissertation, Victoria University.Google Scholar
  14. Outgames. (n.d.). GLISA International. Retrieved April 2012, from http://www.glisa.org/outgames.php
  15. Paris2018. (2017). Paris 2018 Gay Games 10. Retrieved May 2017, from https://www.paris2018.com/
  16. Peper, K. (1994). Female athlete = lesbian: A myth constructed from gender role expectations and lesbiphobia. In R. J. Ringer (Ed.), Queer words, queer images: Communication and the construction of homosexuality (pp. 93–108). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sartore, M. L., & Cunningham, G. B. (2009). The lesbian stigma in the sport context: Implication for women of every sexual orientation. Quest, 61(3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shire, J., Brackenridge, C., & Fuller, M. (2000). Changing positions: The sexual politics of a women’s field hockey team 1986–1996. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 9(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Symons, C. (2002). The gay games and community. In D. Hemphill & C. Symons (Eds.), Gender, sexuality and sport: A dangerous mix (pp. 100–114). Petersham: Walla Walla Press.Google Scholar
  20. Symons, C. (2006). Challenging homophobia and heterosexism in sport: The promise of the gay games. In C. C. Aitchison (Ed.), Sport and gender identities: Masculinities, femininities and sexualities (pp. 140–163). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Symons, C. (2010). The gay games: A history. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Waddell, T. (1982). White paper—Federation of the gay games official site. Retrieved April 2012, from http://www.gaygames.org

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chelsea Litchfield
    • 1
  • Jaquelyn Osborne
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Exercise Science, Sport and HealthCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations