Betraying Further: Arts-Based Education at the ‘End of the World’

  • jan jagodzinski
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Education, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation book series (PEST)

Abstract

This chapter continues questioning the basis of arts-based research that began with a co-edited book with Jason Wallin. I attempt to address critics of the work as well as question what art research is from the perspective of Deleuze and Guattari. I further question the developments in post-qualitative research as well as return to Deleuze and Guattari’s speculative aesthetics in relation to the Anthropocene as developed in the last section of my introduction to this book.

Keywords

Qualitative Research Teacher Candidate Personal Engagement Eternal Return Residual Humanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alliez, É. (2010). Capitalism and schizophrenia and consensus: Of relational aesthetic (Tim Adams, Trans.). In S. Zepke & S. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Deleuze and contemporary art (pp. 85–99). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ansell Pearson, K. (1997). Viroid life: Perspectives on Nietzsche and the transhuman condition. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ansell Pearson, K. (1999). Germinal life: The difference and repetition of Deleuze. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blaagaard, B., & Van de Tuin, I. (2014). The subject of Rosi Braidotti: Politics and concepts. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  7. Beighton, C. (2015). Deleuze and lifelong learning: Creativity, events and ethics. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, A. (1993). The plural event. In Descartes, Hegel, Heidegger. London: Routldge.Google Scholar
  9. Berressem, H. (2005–2006). “n-1 sexes,” rhizomes 11/12. Available at http://rhizomes.net/issue11/berressem/index.html
  10. Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
  11. Boulton-Funke, A. (2014). A critique and a proposal: A/r/tography and arts-based research as methodology. Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 3(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carlin, M., & Wallin, J. (Eds.). (2014). Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people –yet-to-come. London/Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, M. R., & Irwin, R. L. (2014). Between signification and illumination: Unfolding understanding a/r/tographical turn on practicum. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 15(2), 1–19 . Available at http://www.ijea.org/articles.html#vol15.Google Scholar
  16. Colebrook, C. (1999). Ethics and Representation: From Kant to Post-structuralism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Colebrook, C. (2004). Humour and irony – Deleuze and Guattari. In Claire Colebrook, Irony (pp. 140–152). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Colebrook, C. (2006). Postmodernism is a humanism: Deleuze and equivocity. Women: A Cultural Review, 15(3), 283–307.Google Scholar
  19. Colebrook, C. (2008). On not becoming man: The materialist politics of unactualized potential. In S. Alaimo & S. Heckman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 52–84). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Colebrook, C. (2009). On the very possibility of queer theory. In C. Nigianni & M. Storr (Eds.), Deleuze and queer theory (pp. 11–23). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Colebrook, C. (2011). The earth felt the wound: The affective divide. Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, 8(1), 45–58.Google Scholar
  22. Colebrook, C. (2013). Modernism without women: The refusal of becoming-woman (and post-Feminism). Deleuze Studies, 7(4), 427–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dejanovic, S. (2014). Deleuze’s new Meno: On learning, time, and thought. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 48(2), 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Landa, M. (1997). A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  25. Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image (H. Tomlinson and R. Galeta, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault (Seán Hand, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  28. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on societies of control. October, 59 (Winter), 3–7.Google Scholar
  29. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (Paul Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press (DR in text).Google Scholar
  30. Deleuze, G. (1995). The exhausted (A. Uhlmann, Trans.). SubStance, 24(3, 78), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Deleuze, G. (1998). Having an idea in cinema (On the cinema of Staub-Huillet) (Eleanor Kaufman, Trans.). In E. Kaufman and K. J. Heller (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari: New mappings in politics, philosophy, and culture (pp. 14–22). Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. Deleuze, G. (2004a). Logic of sense (M. Lester with C. Stivale, Trans.). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. Deleuze, G. (2004b). Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (M. Taormina, Trans., Lapoujade, D., Ed.). Los Angeles/New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  34. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Steem, & H.R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (TP in text).Google Scholar
  35. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. Dolar, M. (2006). Voice and nothing more. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Dolphijn, R. (2012). Undercurrents and the desert(ed): Negarestani, Tournier and Deleuze map the polytics of a ‘new earth.’. In L. Burns & B. M. Kaiser (Eds.), Postcolonial literatures and Deleuze: Colonial pasts, differential futures (pp. 199–216). London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Foster, H. (2003). Arty party. London Review of Books, 25(23) (December) n.p. Retrieved from http://www.lrb.co.uk/v25/n23/hal-foster/arty-party
  39. Gallop, J. (1997). Feminist accused of sexual harassment. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Geoffey, A., & Pettinger, L. (2014). Refrains and assemblages: Exploring market negotiations and green subjectivity with Guattari. Subjectivity, 7, 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greene, J. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grosz, E. (1993). A thousand tiny sexes: Feminism and rhizomatics. Topoi, 12, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guattari, F. (1995a). The postmodern impasse. In G. Genosko (Ed.), A Guattari reader (pp. 109–113). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Guattari, F. (1995b). Postmodernidm and ethical abdication. In G. Genosko (Ed.), A Guattari reader (pp. 114–117). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Guattari, F. (2000). Three ecologies (I. Pindar & P. Sutton, Trans.). London/New Bruswick, Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  46. Guattari, F. (2012). Schizophrenic cartographies (A. Goffey, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hetrick, J. (2014). Video assemblages: ‘Machinic animism’ and ‘asignifying semiotics’ in the work of Melitopoulos and Lazzarato. Footprint: Deft Architect Theory Journal, 14(Spring), 53–68.Google Scholar
  48. Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hughes, J. (2008). Deleuze and the genesis of representation. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  50. Hughes, C., & Lury, C. (2013). Re-turning feminist methodologies: From a social to an ecological epistemology. Gender and Education, 25(6), 786–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Irwin, R. (2007). Communities of a/r/trographic practice engaged in critical inquiry. In J. A. Park (Ed.), Art education as critical inquiry (pp. 76–89). Seoul: Mijinsa Press.Google Scholar
  52. Irwin, R. (2008). Communities of a/r/trographic practice. In S. Springgay, R. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/t/geography (pp. 71–80). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  53. Irwin, R. (2014). Turning to a/r/tography. Journal of Art Education (KoSEA), 15(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Irwin, R. (2013). Becoming A/r/tography. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 54(3), 198–215.Google Scholar
  55. Irwin, R., & O’Donoghue, D. (2012). Encountering pedagogy through relational art practices. International Journal of Art and Design Education (IJADE), 31(3), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. jagodzinski, j. (2005). Musical fantasies: A Lacanian approach. New York: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
  57. jagodzinski, j. (2013). Counter-actualization: The art of Wafaa Bilal. Performative Paradigm, 9. Available at: http://www.performanceparadigm.net/category/journal/issue-9/
  58. jagodzinski, j. (2014a). The ‘relations’ of relational aesthetics within altermodernity: Revisiting the case of Nicolas Bourriaud. ETUM-E-Journal for Theatre and Media 1(1), 1–8. Available at: http://ejournal.theaterforschung.de/index.php?journal=ausgabe1
  59. jagodzinski, j. (2014b). 1780 and 1985: An avant-garde without authority: Addressing the anthropocene. In I. Buchanan & L. Collins (Eds.), Deleuze and schizoanalysis of visual art (pp. 149–171). London/Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  60. jagodzinski, j. (2014c). An avant-garde without authority: Towards a future oekumene—if there is a future? In H. Felder, F. Vighi, & S. Žižek (Eds.), States of crisis and post-capitalist scenarios (pp. 219–239). Burlington/London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
  61. jagodzinski, j. (2016). A response to: ‘Deconstructing Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus for music education.’ Journal of Aesthetic Education 50(3): 101–121.Google Scholar
  62. jagodzinski, j., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts-based research: A critique and a proposal. Rotterdam/Boston/Taiepei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Kolozova, K. (2014). Cut of the real: Subjectivity in poststructuralist philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (Eds.). (2013). Special issue: Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.Google Scholar
  65. Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leggo, C. (2014). Riffing while riffling: 25 poetic ruminations. Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 3(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Leopold, A. (1941/1999). The round river – A parable. Round river. Undated manuscript. In C. Meine & R. Knight (Eds.), The essential Ado Leopold: Quotations and commentaries. Madison: Madison University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  68. Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3 Spring), 434–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  70. MacCormack, P. (2014). After life. In P. MacCormack (Ed.), The animal catalyst: Towards a human theory (pp. 177–188). London/Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  71. Mazzei, L. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mazzei, L. A., & K. McCoy (Eds.). (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 543–556.Google Scholar
  73. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency (R. Brassier, Trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  75. Moore, H. (2014). Living in molecular times. In B. Blaagaard & I. Van de Tuin (Eds.), The subject of Rosi Braidotti: Politics and concepts (pp. 47–55). London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  76. Moravec, H. (1998). When will computer hardware match the human brain? Journal of Evolution and Technology, 1 . Available at: http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm.
  77. Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Negarestani, R. (2008). Cyclonopedia: Complicity with anonymous materials. Melbourne: Re.press.Google Scholar
  79. Negarestrani, R. (2011). Drafting the inhuman: Conjectures on capitalism and organic necrocracy. In L. Bryant, N. Srinicek, & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 182–201). Melbourne: Re.press.Google Scholar
  80. Parr, A. (2013). Politics + Deleuze + Guattari + Architecture. In H. Frichot & S. Loo (Eds.), Deleuze and architecture (pp. 197–214). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Patton, P. (2000). Deleuze and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Pederson, H. (2013). Follow the Judas sheep: Materializing post-qualitative methodology in zooethnographic space. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Podesva, K. L. (2007). A pedagogical turn: Brief notes on education as art. Fillip, 6. (Summer). Retrieved from http://fillip.ca/content/a-pedagogical-turn
  84. Rogoff, I. (2008). Turning. e-flux journal, 11 (November) Retrieved from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/turning/.
  85. Sawyrer, R. D., & Norris, J. (2012). Duoethnography. New York/Cary: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sellars, J. (2006). An ethic of the event. Angelika, 11(3), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Serres, M. (2002). The natural contract (E. MacArthur & W. Paulson, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  88. Sinner, A., Leggo, C., Irwin, R. L., Gouzouasis, P., & Grauer, K. (2006). Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(4), 1223–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spinoza B (2000 [1677]). Ethics (W. H. White, Trans.). Revised by A.H. Stirling. Intro D. Garrett. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
  90. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, C., & Gouzouasis, P. (Eds.). (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  91. Springgay, S., Irwin, R., & Wilson-Kind, S. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912.Google Scholar
  92. Springgay, S., & Rotas, N. (2014). How do you make a classroom operate like a work of art? Deleuzeguattarian methodologies of research-creation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(5), 552–572. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2014.933913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stengers, I. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22, 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Taguchi, H. L. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analyzing Interview Data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tamboukou, M. (2008). Machinic assemblages: Women, art education and space. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(3), 359–337.Google Scholar
  97. Thacker, E. (2011). In the dust of this planet: Horrors of philosophy 1. Winchester, UK and Washington, USA: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  98. Tiainen, M. (2013). Revisiting the voice in media and medium. European Journal of Media Studies, 2(2), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wallin, J., et al. (2013a). Putrid Deadagogies: Zombie life and the rise of the chaosmopolis. In J. Burdick, J. A. Sandin, & M. P. O’Malley (Eds.), Problematizing Public Pedagogy (pp. 40–51). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Wallin, J., et al. (2013b). One hundred trillion anomals take the stand. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wallin, J. (2014a). Toward a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
  102. Wallin, J. (2014b). Dark posthumanism, unthinking education, and ecology at the end of the anthropocene. In N. Snaza & J. A. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and Educational Research (pp. 134–147). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Wallin, J. (2014c). Dark pedagogy. In P. MacCormack (Ed.), The animal catalyst: Towards ahuman theory (Chap. 9). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  104. Ziarek, K. (2004). The force of art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  106. Žižek, S. (2003). Organ without bodies: Deleuze and consequences. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Zourabichvili, F. (2012). Giles Deleuze: A philosophy of the event (Kieran, A. Trans., Lambert, G. & Smith, D. W., Ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • jan jagodzinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Secondary EducationUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations