Seriously Stylish: Academic Femininities and the Politics of Feminism and Fashion in Academia

  • Ngaire Donaghue
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

What does one wear to work in the life of the mind? The establishment of ‘seriousness’ as a cardinal academic virtue is reinforced via a series of distinctions between the high-minded concerns worthy of scholarly pursuit, and the materialistic, venal and/or frivolous concerns of secular life. The historical marginalisation of women in academia is also reinforced by these distinctions—despite the mass entry of women into academia over the past 40 years, a masculine hegemony continues to set the terms on which women can be accepted into and succeed within academia, and ‘feminine’ interests and concerns are treated with suspicion and/or contempt (Bagilhole 2002). Yet although the force of male hegemony in the academy is considerable, it is by no means uncontested; for many decades, women have fought against the assumption that academic recognition is contingent on eschewing femininity and have sought to find modes of embodiment that acknowledge the presence of women in academia as women (Showalter 1997). Women in academia thus face a dilemma in crafting and communicating what we might think of as (borrowing from Gill and Scharff 2011) ‘academic femininities’—modes of self-presentation that allow them to simultaneously address the requirement to demonstrate intellectual seriousness, while also refusing to accept the traditional exclusion of markers of femininity from the academy.

Keywords

Aesthetic labour Femininities Fashion Postfeminism Academia 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging Equal Opportunities: Changing and Adapting Male Hegemony in Academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgardner, J., & Richards, A. (2000). Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Dworkin, A. (1974). Women Hating. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  6. Entwistle, J., & Rocamora, A. (2006). The Field of Fashion Materialized: A Study of London Fashion Week. Sociology, 40(4), 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2013). As if Postfeminism Had Come True: The Turn to Agency in Cultural Studies of ‘Sexualisation’. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (pp. 240–257). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Henry, A. (2012). Fashioning a Feminist Style, or, How I Learned to Dress from Reading Feminist Theory. In M. Jolles & S. Tarrant (Eds.), Fashion Talks: Undressing the Power of Style. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful Cultural Practices in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Riley, S. C., & Scharff, C. (2013). Feminism Versus Femininity? Exploring Feminist Dilemmas Through Cooperative Inquiry Research. Feminism & Psychology, 23(2), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts, M. (2007). The Fashion Police: Governing the Self in What Not to Wear. In Y. Tasker & D. Negra (Eds.), Interrogating Postfeminism. Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rocamora, A. (2011). Personal Fashion Blogs: Screens and Mirrors in Digital Self-Portraits. Fashion Theory, 15(4), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Scharff, C. (2010). Young Women’s Negotiations of Heterosexual Conventions: Theorizing Sexuality in Constructions of ‘the Feminist’. Sociology, 44(5), 827–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scharff, C. (2012). Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World. Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Showalter, E. (1997). The Professor Wore Prada. Vogue, 187, 80.Google Scholar
  22. Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (Eds.). (2007). Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, L., & Donaghue, N. (2014). The Confidence Trick: Competing Constructions of Confidence and Self-Esteem in Young Women’s Discussions of the Sexualisation of Culture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolf, N. (1990). The Beauty Myth. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ngaire Donaghue
    • 1
  1. 1.School of HumanitiesUniversity of TasmaniaSandy BayAustralia

Personalised recommendations