Theory Matters pp 119-134 | Cite as

The University: A Matter of Theoretical Importance

  • Thomas Docherty
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

‘Material Theory’ addresses what we might think of as ‘worldliness’ in literary, cultural, and other aesthetic forms. Specifically, it addresses the relation between an allegedly ‘globalized’ form of mass higher education and the legacies of the so-called ‘theory wars’ and of late twentieth-century ‘high theory’.

The argument starts from a brief consideration of the arguments advanced by Richard Rorty in Achieving our Country, where he points out that Theory served the purpose of improving greatly our human and social relations—but that it did so only within the academy. Meanwhile, ‘outside’ and in the material realm of the US, real social and economic relations were worsening. This chapter explores the consequences of this, but it does so by questioning the fundamental assumptions that govern Rorty’s argument.

The logic of the chapter starts from the premise that one of the central concerns of the university education is physics: the study of forces, and especially of the forces that hold a social formation together in various different ways. In this respect, there is no ‘outside’ of the university (il n’y a pas de hors-université, so to speak); rather, the university exists precisely as a force within a global physics or material realm.

The question then becomes how we consider the structure of the university itself, in terms of its internal logic or force. Here, the author examines how it is that the institutional rise of ‘high theory’, especially through the 1970s and 1980s, has engaged the questions of globalization and of the social function of the higher education institution itself, and the form and function of the intellectual.

The essay demonstrates that globalization has become something that has perverted the force of Theory itself, to the point where the university as a public and social institution has been actively betrayed; and that it is therefore all the more important to rediscover new ways in which Theory can be made to matter—that is, to become a material force—once more.

Keywords

Academic Freedom Material Reality Critical Consciousness High Theory Material Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. London: Verso, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Auden, W. H. Collected Poems. London: Faber & Faber, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, Samuel. Molloy; Malone Dies; The Unnamable. London: John Calder, 1976 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jaques. Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. London/New York: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Docherty, Thomas, ed. Postmodernism: A Reader. London/New York: Harvester/Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Eliot, T. S. Complete Poems and Plays. London: Faber & Faber, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Fish, Stanley. Versions of Academic Freedom: From Professionalism to Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Geim, Andre. ‘Andre Geim Answers a Few Questions about this Months’s Fast Moving Front in the Field of Physics’. Fast Moving Fronts. November 2006. http://www.esi-topics.com/fmf/2006/november06-AndreGeim.html. Date accessed: 9 October 2014.
  10. Gorz, André. The Immaterial. Trans. Chris Turner. Chicago: Seagull, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Keats, John. Selected Poetry and Letters. Ed. Richard Harter Fogle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. Lévy, Pierre. World Philosophy. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Lyotard, Jean François. La Condition postmoderne. Paris: minuit, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Lyotard, Jean François. Les Immatériaux: Album et inventaire. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, Jean François. The Inhuman. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Morrish, Liz. ‘Institutional Discourse and the Cult(ure) of Managerialism’. Discover Society 8 (2014). 6 May 2014. http://www.discoversociety.org/2014/05/06/institutional-discourse-and-the-culture-of-managerialism/. Date accessed: 26 February 2015.
  18. Newfield, Christopher. Unmaking the Public University: The Forty-Year Assault on the Middle Class. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  19. Novoselov, K. S., A. K. Geim et al. ‘Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films’. Science 306.5696 (204): 666–9.Google Scholar
  20. Plato. Republic. Trans. Desmond Lee. London: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Rorty, Richard. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Said, Edward. The World, the Text, the Critic. London: Faber & Faber, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Sidney, Philip. ‘An Apology for Poetry’. English Critical Essays. Ed. Edmund D. Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 1–54.Google Scholar
  24. Yeats, W. B. Collected Poems. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Docherty
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickWarwickUK

Personalised recommendations