Planning, Housing Supply and Affordable Provision in Britain

  • Nicole Gurran
  • Glen Bramley
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines recent developments in housing and planning policy in Britain, with a particular focus on England in the period following the Barker reviews on housing supply and the planning system (Barker 2004, 2006). Despite a well-established emphasis on housing as a material consideration under the national planning regime, inadequate housing supply emerged as a critical policy problem in the new millennium. The chapter reviews this supply agenda, as well as the range of specific interventions, to support the growing non-profit affordable housing sector in England. These mechanisms—the capacity to require developers to incorporate affordable housing within their development under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act, as well as the capacity to release land for affordable housing in rural areas—have proved particularly important in the context of wider government aspirations for increased housing production as well as specific reforms to the funding and provision of social housing. In particular, the growth over time of a powerful non-profit affordable housing sector, and the close integration of housing policy objectives with wider spatial planning goals, means that affordable housing stock is generally well located in accessible urban areas and that affordable housing providers are able to play an important role in the delivery of new housing in conjunction with market operators. In the context of government austerity and a housing market downturn, the capacity of the affordable housing sector to operate counter cyclically may have been an important factor protecting the UK housing market from collapse and in sustaining much needed supply over the period. However, as discussed in this chapter, a number of tensions in achieving overall housing output remain, particularly under government reforms introduced with the passage of the New Localism Act 2012.

Keywords

Local Authority House Price Social Housing Affordable Housing Local Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, D., & Leishman, C. (2008). Factors affecting housing build-out rates. Report to Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D., & Watkins, C. (2002). Greenfields, brownfields and housing development. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, D., Leishman, C., & Moore, C. (2009). Why not build faster? Explaining the speed at which British house-builders develop new homes for owner-occupation. Town Planning Review, 80(3), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andre, C. (2011). Improving the functioning of the housing market in the UK. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 867, Paris, OECD. doi:  10.1787/5kgc42th5df2-en
  5. Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2012). The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the Labour government’s English regional experiment? Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, M. (2003). Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective. Urban Studies, 40(5), 897–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker, K (2004). Review of housing supply: Delivering stability: Securing our future housing needs. Final Report & Recommendations. London: H M Treasury/TSO.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, K. (2006). Barker review of land use planning - final report - recommendations. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, K. (2008). Planning policy, planning practice, and housing supply. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bramley, G. (2007). The sudden rediscovery of housing supply as a key policy challenge. Housing Studies, 22(2), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bramley, G. (2012a). Affordability, poverty and housing need: Triangulating measures and standards. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bramley, G. (2012b) ‘Localised planning, local sentiment and planning stances: evidence and likely outcomes for housing in England’, paper presented at Policy and Politics Anniversary Conference, Bristol, September 2012.Google Scholar
  13. Bramley, G. (2015a) ‘Pushing on string: demand and supply’, Built Environment, 41(2), 144–165.Google Scholar
  14. Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009) ‘Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities’, Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2125–2142.Google Scholar
  15. Bramley, G., & Kirk, K. (2005). Does planning influence urban form: Recent evidence from Scotland’s cities. Environment & Planning A, 37, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bramley, G., & Leishman, C. (2005). Planning and housing supply in two-speed Britain: Modelling local market outcomes. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2213–2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bramley, G., & Watkins, C. (1995). Circular projections: Household growth, housing need and the household projections. London: Council for the Protection of Rural England.Google Scholar
  18. Bramley, G., & Watkins, D. (2014b). Coalition of the Willing: The shape of urban growth in England post-crisis. Paper presented at ENHR Conference, Edinburgh, July 2014, Workshop 12, Metropolitan Dynamics.Google Scholar
  19. Bretherton, J. and Pleace, N. (2011). A difficult mix: issues in achieving socioeconomic diversity in deprived UK neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, 48(16), 3433–34447.Google Scholar
  20. Burgess, G., Crook, A., & Monk, S. (2013). The changing delivery of planning gain through section 106 and the Community Infrastructure Levy Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research.Google Scholar
  21. Calcutt, J. (2007). Review of housebuilding delivery. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  22. Champion, A. (2002). The containment of urban Britain: Retrospect and prospect. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  23. Cheshire, P. (2007). Are mixed communities the answer to segregation and poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Cheshire, P., Nathan, M., & Overman, H. G. (2014). Urban economics and urban policy: Challenging conventional policy wisdom. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crook. (1996). Affordable housing planning gain, linkage fees and the rational nexus. Using the land use planning system in England and the USA to deliver housing subsidies. Journal of International Planning Studies, 1(1), 49–71.Google Scholar
  26. Crook, T., Currie, J., Jackson, A., Monk, S., Rowley, S., Smith, K., & Whitehead, C. (2002). Planning gain and affordable housing: Making it count. York: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  27. Crook, A., & others. (2010). The Value of Planning Agreements. Report to Department of Communities and Local Government. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  28. Crook, A., Burgess, G., Dunning, R., Ferarri, E., Henneberry, J. M., Lyall Grant, F., & Whitehead, C. (2010). The incidence, value and delivery of planning obligations in England in 2007–08. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  29. Cullingworth, B. (1997). Planning in the USA: Policies, issues, and processes. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cullingworth, J. B., & Nadin, V. (1994). Town and country planning in Britain (11th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. DCLG. (2013). National planning practice guidance: Assessment of housing and economic development needs. Draft ‘Beta’ Version for Consultation, August 2013. http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/assessment-of-housing-and-economic-development-needs
  32. DCLG. (2014). Evaluation of the new homes bonus. London: DCLG. www.gov.uk/dclg.Google Scholar
  33. DoE (Department of the Environment) (1992) Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing. London: DoE.Google Scholar
  34. Dunleavy, P. (1981). The politics of mass housing in Britain, 1945–75: A study of corporate power and professional influence in the welfare state. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dunning, R., Inch, A., Payne, S., Watkins, C., While, A. Young, G., Hickman, H., Bramley, G., McIntosh, S., Watkins, D., & Valler, D. (2014). The impact of new homes bonus on attitudes and behaviour. White Rose Working Paper, University of Sheffield. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/81581/
  36. Dunse, N., Thanos, S., & Bramley, G. (2013). Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences. Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Evans, A. W. (1991). “Rabbit hutches on postage stamps”: Planning, development and political economy. Urban Studies, 28, 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Evans, A. W., & Hartwich, N. (2005). Unaffordable housing: Fables and myths. London: Policy Exchange. http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/category/item/unaffordable-housing-fables-and-myths
  39. Ferrari, E. (2012). Competing ideas of social justice and space: Locating critiques of housing renewal in theory and practice. International Journal of Housing Policy, 12(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallent, N., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2007). Decent homes for all: Planning’s evolving role in housing provision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saiz, A. (2008). Housing supply and housing bubbles. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grant, M. (1992). Planning law and the British land-use planning system: An overview. Town Planning Review, 63(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griffith, M. (2011). We Must Fix It: Delivering reform of the building sector to meet the UK’s housing and economic challenges. Report. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, P., Thomas, H., Gracey, R., & Drewett, R. (1973). The containment of urban England. London: Geo Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  45. Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., Gannon, M., & Watkins, D. (2015). The cost of the cuts: Their impact on local government and poorer communities’. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. www.jrf.org.uk
  46. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Healey, P., & Purdue, E. (1993). Gains from planning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Hilber, C., & Vermeulen, W. (2010). The effects of supply constraints on housing costs: Empirical evidence for England and assessment of policy implications. Final Report to NHPAU. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  49. Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, E. (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? Spon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Leishman, C. (2015). Housing supply and suppliers: Are the microeconomics of housing developers important? Housing Studies, 1–21.Google Scholar
  51. Lyons, M. (2014). Mobilising across the nation to build the homes our children need. The Lyons Housing Review. London: Digital Creative Services (London) Limited. www.dcsprint.co.uk
  52. Malpass, P. (2010). The rise (and rise?) of housing associations. In P. Malpass & R. Rowlands (Eds.), Housing, markets and policies (pp. 101–121). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Matthews, P., Bramley, G., & Hastings, A. (2014). Home Economicus in a Big Society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments. Housing Theory and Society. 19pp.Google Scholar
  54. Meen, G. (2011). A long run model of housing affordability. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 1081–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Molior. (2014). Barriers to housing delivery in London: Update. Greater London Authority. https://ww.london.gov.uk/file/24159.
  56. Monk, S. (2010). England. Affordable housing through the planning system: The role of Section 106. In N. Calavita & A. Mallach (Eds.), Inclusionary housing in international perspective. Affordable housing, social inclusion and land value recapture. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. ISBN 978-1-55844-209-2Google Scholar
  57. Monk, S., Crook, T., Lister, D., Rowley, S., Short, C., & Whitehead, C. (2005). Land and finance for affordable housing: The complementary roles of Social Housing Grant and the provision of affordable housing through the planning system. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. See also JRF Findings, March 2005, ‘Have planning agreements increased the supply of affordable housing?’.Google Scholar
  58. Mullins, D., & Pawson, H. (2009). After stock transfer: Britain’s new social landlords. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  59. Norris, M., & Coates, D. (2014). How housing killed the Celtic tiger: Anatomy and consequences of Ireland’s housing boom and bust. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(2), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). (2003). Sustainable communities plan. London: ODPM.Google Scholar
  61. OFT (Office of Fair Trading) (2008). Homebuilding in the UK: a market study. London: OFT.Google Scholar
  62. ONS. (Office of National Statistics). (2014). Annual mid-year population estimates, 2013. www.ons.gov.uk
  63. Oxley, M., Brown, T., Nadin, V., Qu, L., Tummers, L., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. (2009). Review of European planning systems. Report by De Montford University, Centre for Comparative Housing Research, and Delft University of Technology for National Housing and Planning Advice Unit.Google Scholar
  64. Pawson, H., & Davidson, E. (2008). Radically divergent? Homelessness policy and practice in post-devolution Scotland. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Prior, A., & Raemaekers, J. (2007). Is green belt fit for purpose in a post-Fordist landscape? Planning Practice and Research, 22(4), 579–599. doi: 10.1080/02697450701770100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rydin, Y. (2003). Urban and environmental planning in the UK. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  67. Satsangi, M., Gallent, N., & Bevan, M. (2010). The rural housing question: Communities and planning in Britain’s countrysides. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. School of Planning and Housing. (2000). The role of the planning system in the development of housing in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  69. Stephens, M. (2011). Tackling housing market volatility in the UK. Report of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Housing Market Taskforce. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  70. Taylor, M., & Walker, C. (2015). Garden villages: Empowering localism to solve the housing crisis. Policy Exchange. http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/garden villages.pdf.Google Scholar
  71. Tetlow, K. (2012). Planning for less full figures: Updates research on the impact of revocation of regional strategies on proposed and adopted local housing targets across England. Research Report for Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  72. van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Whitehead, C., Scanlon, K., & Lunde, J. (2014). The impact of the financial crisis on European housing systems: A review. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS). Report No. 2. ISBN 978-91-86107-46-8. www.sieps.se

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Gurran
    • 1
  • Glen Bramley
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture Design and PlanningThe University of SydneyDarlingtonAustralia
  2. 2.School of the Built EnvironmentHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations