Advertisement

Collectivity, Poetics, and Agency

  • Lise Kjølsrød
Chapter
Part of the Leisure Studies in a Global Era book series (LSGE)

Abstract

With the help of three casuistic illustrations, this chapter shows how players come to experience aspects of their games in the light of some destabilizing element in life. Metaphors that emerge are not ‘just interesting images’ but can better be understood as imprints of their concerns, made concrete and accessible in play. The metaphors are not linguistic in form, rather representations giving conceptual shape to some emotionally difficult or cognitively unclear subject matter. The point is not if the images are true or false, nor if they reflect how actors understand things, the point is what they tell about the individual’s and group’s perception of a good scenario. When players’ metaphorical constructions become incorporated into their spoken language; they acquire a narrative structure, and audiences’ way of reading is also narrative in form.

References

  1. Adger, W. N. “Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?” Progress in Human Geography 24, no. 3 (2000): 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agahi, N., and M. G. Parker. “Leisure Activities and Mortality: Does Gender Matter?” Journal of Aging and Health 20, no. 7 (2008): 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  4. Aubert, W., and H. White. “Sleep: A Sociological Interpretation.” Acta Sociologica 4, no. 1 (1959): 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bråten, S. “Model Monopoly and Communication: Systems Theoretical Notes on Democratization.” Acta Sociologica 16, no. 2 (1973): 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. “Life as a Narrative.” Social Research 71, no. 3 (2004): 670–691.Google Scholar
  7. Daloz, J.-P. “Political Elites and Conspicuous Modesty: Norway, Sweden, Finland in Comparative Perspective.” In Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites, edited by F. Engelstad and T. Gulbrandsen. Comparative Social Research 23 (2006): 171–210.Google Scholar
  8. Elsrud, T. Taking Time and Making Journeys: Narratives on Self and the Other among Backpackers. Lund: Lund Dissertations in Sociology, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. “The Problem of Ego Identity.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 4, no. 1 (1956): 56–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksson, L., J. Rice, and R. E. Goodin. “Temporal Aspects of Life Satisfaction.” Social Indicators Research 80, no. 3 (2007): 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gadamer, H. G. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad, 1982 [1960].Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. Art, Mind and Brain. New York: Basic Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Gell, A. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, P., and M. Lamont. “Introduction.” In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, edited by P. Hall and M. Lamont, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, P. L. The Work of the Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Katz, A. N. “On Choosing the Vehicles of Metaphors: Referential Concreteness, Semantic Distances, and Individual Differences.” Journal of Memory and Language 28, no. 4 (1989): 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keck, M., and P. Sakdapolrak. “What is Social Resilience? Lessons Learned and Ways Forward.” Erkunde 67, no. 1 (2013): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kofman, S. Nietzsche and Metaphor. Translated by Duncan Large. London: The Athlone Press, 1993 [1972].Google Scholar
  19. Kuykendall, L., L. Tay, and V. Ng. “Leisure Engagement and Subjective Well-being: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kvam, R. I hodet på en seiler (In the Head of a Sailor). Oslo: Gyldendal, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. Lakoff, G. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamont, M., J. S. Welburn, and C. M. Fleming. “Responses to Discrimination and Social Resilience Under Neoliberalism: The United States Compared.” In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, edited by P. A. Hall and M. Lamont, 129–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  24. Lorentz, D. “The Diversity of Resilience: Contributions from a Social Science Perspective.” Natural Hazards (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9654-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lutus, P. Confessions of a Long-Distance Sailor. An Account of an Around-the-World Solo Sail in a 31-foot Boat, 1988–1991, 2005. http://arachnoid.com/lutusp/sailbook.html.
  26. Mead, G. H. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  27. Peirce, C. S. “Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs.” In The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings, edited by J. Buchler, 98–119. London: Kegan Paul, 1955.Google Scholar
  28. Presser, L. “The Narratives of Offenders.” Theoretical Criminology 13, no. 2 (2009): 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandberg, S. “What can ‘Lies’ Tell Us about Life? Notes towards a Framework of Narrative Criminology.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21, no. 4 (2010): 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandemose, A. En flyktning krysser sitt spor (A Fugitive Crosses His Tracks). Oslo: Aschehoug & Co, 1933.Google Scholar
  31. Schiermer, B. Project Description: Creative Action in Different Cultural Settings. Submitted to Department of Sociology and Human Geography, The University of Oslo, 2016.Google Scholar
  32. Sennett, R. The Fall of Public Man. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974.Google Scholar
  33. Simmel, G. “The Adventurer.” Translated by David Kettler. In George Simmel, On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by Donald Levine, 187–198. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971 [1911].Google Scholar
  34. Sutton-Smith, B. The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001 [1997].Google Scholar
  35. Swidler, A. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51, no. 2 (1986): 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swidler, A. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  37. White, H. C. Identity & Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  38. Winnicott, D. “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena.” In Collected Papers, 229–242. New York: Basic Books, 1971 [1951].Google Scholar
  39. Zucker, L. G. “Organizations as Institutions.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 2, no. 1 (1983): 1–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lise Kjølsrød
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations