Regionalism: In Crisis?

  • Sebastian Krapohl
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks in IPE book series (PHIPE)


The new regionalism has been one of the mega-trends in the global economy since the 1990s. The Eurocentrism of classic integration theories is a problem for analysing new regional organizations, which develop in fundamentally different background conditions. With the turn of the millennium, many regional organizations of the Global South faced increasing obstacles to further integration. The rise of regional powers in the Global South did not lead to a renewed rise of regionalism. Only East Asia was able to resist the trend in declining regionalism, and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) became the nucleus of further integration efforts. Today, regionalism is also challenged in the Global North, where the European Union (EU) is stalled in crisis, and where the Trump administration renegotiates North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).


  1. Acharya, A. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, E. 1997. Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium 26: 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alter, K., and L. Helfer. 2010. Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice. International Organization 64: 563–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspinwall, M.D., and G. Schneider. 2000. Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration. European Journal of Political Research 38: 1–36.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R.E., and E. Seghezza. 2010. Are Trade Blocs Building or Stumbling Blocs? Journal of Economic Integration 25: 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2012. From Europeanisation to Diffusion: An Introduction. West European Politics 35: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles, P. 1997. ASEAN, AFTA and the “New Regionalism”. Pacific Affairs 10: 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breslin, S., C.W. Huges, N. Phillips, and B. Rosamond, eds. 2002. New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Calfat, G., and R.G. Flores. 2006. The EU-Mercosol Free Trade Agreement: Quantifying Mutual Gains. Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 921–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Lombaerde, P., F. Söderbaum, L. Van Langenhove, and F. Baert. 2010. The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism. Review of International Studies 36: 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dür, A. 2007. Regionalism in the World Economy: Building Block or Stumbling Stone for Globalization? In Globalization: State of the Art and Perspectives, ed. S. Schirm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Eden, L. 2007. Multinationals, Foreign Direct Investment and the New Regionalism in the Americas. Integration & Trade 11: 97–123.Google Scholar
  13. Fink, S., and D. Rempe. 2017. Trade Network Analyses. In Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC, ed. S. Krapohl, 91–112. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forwood, G. 2001. The Road to Cotonou: Negotiating a Successor to Lomé. Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamble, A., and A. Payne. 1996. Regionalism and World Order. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimes, W.W. 2015. East Asian Financial Regionalism: Why Economic Enhancements Undermine Political Sustainability. Contemporary Politics 21: 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haas, E.B. 1961. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organization 15: 266–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 1975. The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  19. Haas, E.B., and P.C. Schmitter. 1964. Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America. International Organization 18: 705–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 2000. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political Economy 5: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Irwin, D.A. 2017. The False Promise of Protectionism: Why Trump’s Trade Policy Could Backfire. Foreign Affairs 96: 45–56.Google Scholar
  22. Jetschke, A., and T. Lenz. 2013. Does Regionalism Diffuse? A New Research Agenda for the Study of Regional Organizations. Journal of European Public Policy 20: 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jetschke, A., and P. Murray. 2012. Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia. West European Politics 35: 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katzenstein, P.J. 2000. Regionalism and Asia. New Political Economy 5: 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krapohl, S. 2015. Financial Crises as Catalysts for Regional Cooperation? Chances and Obstacles for Financial Integration in ASEAN+3, MERCOSUR and the Eurozone. Contemporary Politics 21: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2017a. ASEAN. In Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC, ed. S. Krapohl, 115–146. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2017b. Two Logics of Regional Integration and the Games Regional Actors Play. In Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC, ed. S. Krapohl, 33–62. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krapohl, S., and S. Fink. 2013. Different Paths of Regional Integration: Trade Networks and Regional Institution-Building in Europe, Southeast Asia and Southern Africa. Journal of Common Market Studies 51: 472–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krapohl, S., K.L. Meißner, and J. Muntschick. 2014. Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos of Regional Integration? Unilateral Actions of Brazil and South Africa and their Negative Effects on MERCOSUR and SADC. Journal of Common Market Studies 52: 879–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenz, T. 2012. Spurred Emulation: The EU and Regional Integration in MERCOSUR and SADC. West European Politics 35: 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacIntyre, A. 2001. Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia. International Organization 55: 81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahrenbach, L.C. 2016. Domestic Politics, Emerging Powers and WTO Dispute Settlement Reform. International Negotiation 21: 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malamud, A. 2015. Interdependence, Leadership and Institutionalization: The Triple Deficit and Fading Prospects of Mercosur. In Limits to Regional Integration, ed. S. Dosenrode, 163–179. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Mansfield, E.D., and H.V. Milner. 1999. The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization 53: 589–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mansfield, E.D., and E. Reinhardt. 2003. Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Arrangements. International Organization 57: 829–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattli, W. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mearsheimer, J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 15: 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meissner, K.L. 2017. MERCOSUR. In Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC, ed. S. Krapohl, 147–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Muntschick, J. 2013. Regionalismus und Externer Einfluss: Stört die Europäische Union die Regionale Marktintegration im südlichen Afrika? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 54: 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2017. SADC. In Regional Integration in the Global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC, ed. S. Krapohl, 179–208. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Niemann, A., and D. Ioannou. 2015. European Economic Integration in Times of Crisis: A Case of Neofunctionalism? Journal of European Public Policy 22: 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Owen, E., and S. Walter. 2017. Open Economy Politics and Brexit: Insights, Puzzles, and the Way Forward. Review of International Political Economy 24: 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pedersen, T. 2002. Cooperative Hegemony: Power, Ideas and Institutions in Regional Integration. Review of International Studies 28: 677–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pierson, P. 1996. The Path to European Political Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29: 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pollack, M.A. 1996. The New Institutionalism and EG Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 9: 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saxton, J. 2003. Argentina’s Economic Crisis: Causes and Cures. Washington: Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress.Google Scholar
  48. Schimmelfennig, F. 2015. Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22: 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schirm, S.A. 2002. Globalization and the New Regionalism: Global Markets, Domestic Politics and Regional Cooperation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  50. Söderbaum, F. 2013. What’s Wrong with Regional Integration? The Problem of Eurocentrism. EUI Working Papers 64.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2016. Rethinking Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Söderbaum, F., and A. Sbragia. 2011. EU Studies and the ‘New Regionalism’: What can be Gained from Dialogue? Journal of European Integration 32: 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevens, C. 2008. Economic Partnership Agreements: What Can We Learn? New Political Economy 13: 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stubbs, R. 2014. ASEAN’s Leadership in East Asian Region-Building: Strength in Weakness. The Pacific Review 27: 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. 1991. Neofunctionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the EC. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 20: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trauner, F. 2016. Asylum Policy: The EU’s ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure. Journal of European Integration 38: 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warleigh-Lack, A., and B. Rosamond. 2010. Across the EU-Studies-New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue. Journal of Common Market Studies 48: 993–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Krapohl
    • 1
  1. 1.International Relations, Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations