Advertisement

Sustainability

  • Fred Gale
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks in IPE book series (PHIPE)

Abstract

Gale’s chapter provides a timely critique of IPE’s limited theoretical engagement with the concept of sustainable development. He highlights how nationalist, liberal, and critical IPE as manifested in green mercantilism, liberal environmentalism, and eco-socialism employ pre-established theoretical categories that perpetuate anthropocentric understandings of the human-nature relationship. Combining ecological thought with governance, Gale identifies an emergent IPE approach in sustainability governance that emphasises multistakeholder deliberation across entrenched, differently conceptualised notions of economic value. Applied to international trade, the approach challenges the free trade-protectionism dichotomy so dominant in IPE policymaking with one that distinguishes free traders and general protectionists from fair traders, the latter seeking sustainably produced and labelled products regardless of country of origin.

References

  1. Alperovitz, G. 2014. The Political-Economic Foundations of a Sustainable System. In State of the World 2014: Governing for Sustainability, 191–202. Washington, DC: The Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Auld, G. 2014. Constructing Private Governance: The Rise and Evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, C., P. Cafaro, and T. Newholm. 2005. Philosophy and Ethical Consumption. In The Ethical Consumer, ed. R. Harrison, T. Newholm, and D. Shaw, 11–24. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, S. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwati, J. 1993. The Case for Free Trade. Scientific American 269 (5): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biermann, F., and others. 2012. Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance. Science 335 (6074): 1306–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bookchin, M. 1982. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Palo Alto: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  8. Burkett, P. 2009. Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  9. Cadman, T. 2011. Quality and Legitimacy of Global Governance: Case Lessons from Forestry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, W. 2010. Crisis, Movements, Counter-Hegemony: In Search of the New. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 2 (2): 168–198.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, R. 2009. The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing Through Markets. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clapp, J., and P. Dauvergne. 2005. Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connelly, S. 2007. Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 12 (3): 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daly, H., and J. Cobb. 1994. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Devall, B., and G. Sessions. 1985. Deep Ecology: Living as If Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, S. 2010. The Fair Trade Challenge to Embedded Liberalism. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4): 1013–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ervine, K., and G. Fridell, eds. 2015. Beyond Free Trade: Alternative Approaches to Trade, Politics and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, J.B., B. Clark, and R. York. 2010. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gale, F. 2018. The Political Economy of Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gale, F., and T. Cadman. 2014. Whose Norms Prevail? Policy Networks, International Organizations and “Sustainable Forest Management”. Society & Natural Resources 27 (2): 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gale, F., and M. Haward. 2011. Global Commodity Governance: State Responses to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gulbrandsen, L. 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forest and Fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haas, P., R. Keohane, and M. Levy, eds. 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hardin, G. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Homer-Dixon, T. 1991. On the Threshold: Environmental Changes as Causes of Acute Conflict. International Security 16 (2): 76–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, T. 2005. Motivating Sustainable Consumption. A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network, University of Guildford, Surrey.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, M. 1999. Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept. In Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, ed. A. Dobson, 23–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, P. 1997. In Praise of Cheap Labor. Slate, March 2.Google Scholar
  31. Kugelman, M., and S. Levenstein. 2009. Land Grab? The Race for the World’s Farmland. Washington, DC: Asia Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  32. Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, B. Foran, L. Lobefaro, and A. Geschke. 2012. International Trade Drives Biodiversity Threats in Developing Nations. Nature 486 (7401): 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leopold, A. 1949 [1970]. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  34. List, F. 1841 [1856]. National System of Political Economy. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
  35. Martinez-Alier, J., G. Munda, and J. O’Neill. 1998. Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics 26 (3): 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mavroidis, P., and R. Wolfe. 2017. Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More. World Trade Review 16 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mikler, J. 2007. Varieties of Capitalism and the Auto Industry’s Environmental Initiatives: National Institutional Explanations for Firms’ Motivations. Business & Politics 9 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mol, A., and G. Spaargaren. 2000. Ecological Modernisation Theory in Debate: A Review. Environmental Politics 9 (1): 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naess, A. 2005. The Basics of Deep Ecology. The Trumpeter 21 (1): 61–71.Google Scholar
  40. O’Connor, J. 1988. Capitalism Nature Socialism: A Theoretical Introduction. Capitalism Nature Socialism 1 (1): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Boston: Harvard Scholars.Google Scholar
  42. Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Sale, K. 1985. Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spash, C. 2007. Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV): Issues in Combining Economic and Political Processes to Value Environmental Change. Ecological Economics 63 (4): 690–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanovich, K. 2009. Distinguishing the Reflective, Algorithmics and Autonomous Minds: Is It Time for a Tri-Process Theory? In In Two Minds: Dual Processes and beyond, ed. J. Evans and K. Frankish, 55–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stolle, D., M. Hooghe, and M. Micheletti. 2005. Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation. International Political Science Review 26 (3): 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. 2003. Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review 93 (2): 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Alstine, J., and E. Neumayer. 2008. The Environmental Kuznets Curve. In Handbook on Trade and the Environment, ed. K. Gallagher, 49–59. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Vogler, J. 2011. International Relations Theory and the Environment. In Global Environmental Politics: Concepts, Theories, and Case Studies, ed. G. Kutting, 11–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, M. 1996. International Political Economy and Global Environmental Change. In The Environment and International Relations, ed. John Vogler and Mark Imber, 41–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Young, O. 1989. International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Gale
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TasmaniaLauncestonAustralia

Personalised recommendations