Advertisement

Space, Place and Dirty Work: The Experiences of Street Cleaners, Refuse Collectors and Graffiti Removers

  • Ruth Simpson
  • Jason Hughes
  • Natasha Slutskaya
Chapter

Abstract

As we discussed in Chap.  4, in highlighting the interdependencies between discourse and materiality, Hardy and Thomas (2014) point to the significance of bodies and space as well as objects and practices in understanding relations of power. The body is the site of ‘local, intimate and intricate power relations’, enacted and contested through the intersection of the material and the discursive—a source and agent of experience, composed of immediate perceptions, feelings, and reactions. An embodied being is thus necessarily actively involved with and inseparable from its surrounding world. Practices, as structures of action, shape how bodies are involved, how objects are used, and how subjects act and are acted upon. Here the body ceaselessly performs the activities of centring, appropriating, and projecting—in effect building the world of experience that transpires through practices.

Keywords

Social Space Geographical Space Geographical Mobility Refuse Collector Dirty Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1973). The Berber house. In M. Douglas (Ed.), Rules and Meanings: The Anthropology of Everyday Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1999). The weight of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Charlesworth, S. (2000). A phenomenology of the working class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Creswell, T. (2002). Guest editorial. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrell, J. (1993). Crimes of style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregson, N., & Rose, G. (2000). Taking butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(4), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2006). Negotiating gendered identities at work: Place, space and time. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanquinet, L., Savage, M., & Callier, L. (2012). Elaborating Bourdieu’s field analysis in urban studies: Cultural dynamics in Brussels. Urban Geography, 33(4), 508–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (2003). Organizing textscapes. Organization Studies, 25(1), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lachmann, R. (1988). Graffiti as career and ideology. American Journal of Sociology, 94(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. London: Methuan.Google Scholar
  18. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant masculinities: Employment change and white working class youth. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Painter, J. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 239–259). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Reay, D., Hollingworth, S., Williams, K., Crozier, G., Jamieson, F., James, D., & Beedell, P. (2007). ‘A darker shade of pale?’ Whiteness, the middle classes and multi-ethnic inner city schooling. Sociology, 41(6), 1041–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slater, T. (2006). The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 737–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sugrue, T. J. (2005). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational space. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tyler, M. (2011). Tainted love: From dirty work to abject labour in Soho’s sex shops. Human Relations, 64(11), 1477–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tyler, M., & Abbott, P. (1998). Chocs away: Weight watching in the contemporary airline industry. Sociology, 32(3), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Simpson
    • 1
  • Jason Hughes
    • 2
  • Natasha Slutskaya
    • 3
  1. 1.Brunel Business SchoolBrunel UniversityUxbridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.School of Business, Management and EconomicsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations