Animal Sexual Assault

Chapter

Abstract

The chapter begins by discussing academic and legal definitions of animal sexual assault. It argues that, given that in effect animals are wards under our control and that they are unable to offer consent in forms that we can understand, all sexual advances towards animals should be seen as sexual assault. The extent of animal sexual assault is discussed. Studies have found that up to 35 % of adult populations have committed animal sexual assault, although we acknowledge that these findings should be treated cautiously, given their methodological limitations. Next, the literature on why humans engage in sexual activities with animals, including Beirne’s typology with its categories of adolescent sexual experimentation, aggravated cruelty, commercial exploitation and zoophilia, is critically reviewed. The chapter concludes by arguing for the development of reliable empirical research, pro-animal legislation and multi-strategy responses to animal sexual assault.

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Osborn, C. A. & Twigg, D. A. (1993). Sexual assault through the lifespan: adult offenders with juvenile histories. In H. Barbee, W. Marshall, S. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 104–117). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. C. (1995) Bestiality: the unmentioned abuse. The Animals’ Agenda, 15(6), 29–31.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, J. C. (1998). Bringing peace home: a feminist perspective on the Abuse of women, children and pet animals. In R. Lockwood & F. Ascione (Eds.), Cruelty to animals and interpersonal violence: readings in research and application (pp. 318–339). Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, W. A., & Freinhar, J. P. (1991). A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff. International Journal of Psychosomantics, 38, 1–4.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  7. Arluke, A., Levin, J., Luke, C., & Ascione, F. (1999). The relationship of animal abuse to violence and other forms of antisocial behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(9), 963–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ascione, F. R. (1999). The abuse of animals and human interpersonal violence. In F. R. Ascione & P. Arkow (Eds.), Child abuse, domestic violence and animal abuse: linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention (pp. 50–61). Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beetz, A. M. (2004). Bestiality/zoophilia: a scarcely investigated phenomenon between crime, paraphilia, and love. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beetz, A. M. (2010). Bestiality and zoophilia: a discussion of sexual contact with animals. In F. Ascione (Ed.), The international handbook of animal abuse and cruelty: theory, research, and application (pp. 201–220). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beirne, P. (1997). Rethinking bestiality: towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault. Theoretical Criminology, 1(3), 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beirne, P. (2002). On the sexual assault of animals: a sociological view. In A. Creager & W. Jordan (Eds.), The animal/human boundary: historical perspectives. Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press and Davis Center, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  13. Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting animal abuse: law, criminology and human-animal relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Boat, B. W. (1999). Abuse of children and abuse of animals: using the links to inform child assessment and protection. In F. R. Ascione & P. Arkow (Eds.), Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse: linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention (pp. 83–100). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brayford, J., Cowe, F., & Deering, J. (2012). Sex offenders, punish, help, change or control? Theory, policy and practice explored. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cottrell, C. (2013). German legislators vote to outlaw bestiality. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/world/europe/german-legislators-vote-to-outlaw-bestiality.html?_r=0. Accessed 13 November 2014.
  17. Cusack, C. M. (2013). Feminism and husbandry: drawing the fine line between mine and bovine. Journal for Critical Animal Studies Online-Only Journal, 11(1), 24–45.Google Scholar
  18. Earls, C. M., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2002). A case study of preferential bestiality (zoophilia). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(1), 83–88.Google Scholar
  19. Earls, C. M., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2009). A case study of preferential bestiality. Archives of Sexual behaviour, 38(4), 605–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. English, K. Jones, L. Patrick, D., & Pasini-Hill, D. (2003). Sexual offender containment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. (2010). The dignity of animals and the evaluation of interests in the Swiss animal protection act. http://www.akademien-schweiz.ch/en/index/Portrait/Kommissionen-AG/Ethikkommission-fuer-Tierversuche.html. Accessed 13 November 2014.
  22. Fleming, W., Jory, B., & Burton, D. (2002). Characteristics of juvenile offenders admitting to sexual activity with nonhuman animals, Society & Animals, 10(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flynn, C. P. (1999). Animal abuse in childhood and later support for interpersonal violence in families. Society & Animals, 7(2), 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Government of Canada. (2015). The criminal code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46). http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/FullText.html. Accessed 30 August 2015.
  25. Greenfeld, L. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: an analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Grune, K. (2008). Changing perspectives of bestiality: breaking the human-animal distinction to violating animal rights. http://www.stanford.edu/group/pwruab/cgi-bin/pwrofthepen/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/kerstin-grune1.pdf. Accessed 04 October 2011.
  27. Hensley, C. Tallichet, S. E., & Dutkiewicz, E. L. (2010). Childhood bestiality: a potential precursor to adult interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hensley, C., Tallichet, S. E., & Singer, S. D. (2006). Exploring the possible link between childhood and adolescent bestiality and interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(7), 910–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hollin, C. R., Palmer, E. J., & Hatcher, R. M. (2010). Sexual offences against children. In F. Brookman, M. Maguire, H. Pierpoint, & T. H. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook on crime (pp. 525–541). Uffculme, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  30. Home Office. (2000). Setting the boundaries: reforming the law on sexual offences. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/vol1main.pdf?view=Binary. Accessed 11 December 2014.
  31. Howe, E. (2003). Peter singer and bestiality. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 14(4), 311–321.Google Scholar
  32. Hunt, M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 1970s. Chicago: Playboy Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kalof, L., Fitzgerald, A., & Baralt, L. (2004) Animals, women and weapons: blurred sexual boundaries in the discourse of sport hunting. Society and Animal, 12(3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders & Co.Google Scholar
  35. Kinsey, A., Wardell, C., Pomeroy, B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders & Co.Google Scholar
  36. Maher, J. (2015). Animal sexual assault. In A. Ackerman, & R. Furmanfor (Eds.), Sexual crimes: transnational problems and global perspectives (pp. 226–242). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maher, J., & Pierpoint, H. (2012). Animal abuse and sex offending. In J. Brayford, F. Cowe, & J. Deering (Eds.), Sex offenders, punish, help, change or control? Theory, policy and practice explored. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, W. L. (1989). Invited essay: intimacy, loneliness and sexual offenders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 27, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257–275). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., & Cortoni, F. A. (2000). Childhood attachments, sexual abuse, and their relationship to adult coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 17–26.Google Scholar
  41. McConville, M., Sanders, A., & Leng, R. (1991). The case for the prosecution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Merz-Perez, L., & Heide, K. M. (2004). Animal cruelty: pathway to violence against people. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Miletski, H. (2000). Bestiality/zoophilia: an exploratory study. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 3, 149–150.Google Scholar
  44. Milgrom, J. (2000). Leviticus 17–22. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, K. S., & Knutson, J. F. (1997). Reports of severe physical punishment and exposure to animal cruelty by inmates convicted of felonies and by university students. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ministry of Justice (MoJ). (2015a). Replies to Freedom of Information Requests 18 August (FOI 98889) and 16 June 2015 (FOI 97859). London: MoJ.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Justice (MoJ). (2015b). Replies to Freedom of Information Requests 28 September (FOI 72179) and 6 Oct (FOI 72644). London: MoJ.Google Scholar
  48. Monroe, H. (2006). Animal sexual abuse: a veterinary taboo? The Veterinary Journal, 172, 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Munro, H. M., & Thrusfield, M. V. (2001a). ‘Battered pets’: sexual abuse. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 42, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Munro, H. M., & Thrusfield, M. V. (2001b). ‘Battered pets’: non-accidental physical injuries found in dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 42(6), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. (2013). Facts and figures about child abuse in the UK. http://www.nspcc.org.uk/news-and-views/media-centre/key-information-for-journalists/facts-and-figures/Facts-and-figures_wda73664.html Accessed 12 December 2013.
  52. Robin, M., & Bensel, R. (1998). Pets and socialisation of children. In R. Lockwood & F. Ascione (Eds.), Cruelty to animals and interpersonal violence: reading in research and application (pp. 211–224). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Royal Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [RSPCA]. (2011). Personal correspondence between Harriet Pierpoint and Royal Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Horsham: RSPCA.Google Scholar
  54. Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage. New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ryder, R. (1975). Victims of science: the use of animals in research. London: Davis-Poynter.Google Scholar
  56. Segura-Serrano, A. (2006). Internet regulation and the role of international law. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 10, 191–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sentencing Council. (2012). Sexual offences guideline consultation. London: Sentencing Council.Google Scholar
  58. Serpell, J. (2002). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection—beyond the ‘Cute Response’. Society & Animals, 10(4), 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sex Offences Review Group. (2000). Setting the boundaries: reforming the law on sex offences. Vol. 1. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  60. Shapiro, K., Randour, M. L., Krinsk, S., & Wolf, J. L. (2014). The assessment and treatment of children who abuse animals: the AniCare child approach. 2nd edition. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tingle, D., Bernard, G., Robbins, L., Newman, G., & Hutchinson, D. (1998). Childhood and adolescent characteristics of paedophiles and rapists. In R. Lockwood & F. Ascione (Eds.), Cruelty to animals and interpersonal violence: reading in research and application (pp. 211–224). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  62. UK Citizens Online Democracy. (2013). Prosecutions for possession of extreme pornographic images. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com Accessed 13 Decemeber 2014.
  63. Vermont Animal Cruelty Task Force. (2005). FACT SHEET: animal sexual abuse. http://www.vactf.com/pdfs/bestiality-factsheet.pdf Accessed 13 April 2011.
  64. Walker, L. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  65. Wilcox, D. T., Foss, C. M., & Donathy. M. L. (2005). A case study of a male sex offender with zoosexual interests and behaviours. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(3), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilcox, D., Foss, C., & Donathy, M. (2015). Working with zoosexual offenders (addressing high levels of deviance). In D. Wilcox, T. Garrett, & L. Harkins (Eds.), Sex offender treatment: a case study approach to issues and interventions (pp. 242–266). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  67. Williams, C. J., & Weinberg, M. S. (2003). Zoophilia in men: a study of sexual interests in animals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Health Organisation. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorder. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  69. Yates, P. M. (2013). Treatment of sexual offenders: research, best practices, and emerging models. The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zequi Sde, C., Guimarães, G. C., da Fonseca, F. P., Ferreira, U, de Matheus, W. E., Reis, L. O., et al. (2012). Sex with animals (SWA): behavioral characteristics and possible association with penile cancer. A multicenter study. Journal of Sex Medicine, 9(7), 1860–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piers Beirne
    • 1
  • Jennifer Maher
    • 2
  • Harriet Pierpoint
    • 2
  1. 1.Criminology DepartmentUniversity of Southern MainePortlandUSA
  2. 2.Centre for CriminologyUniversity of South WalesPontypriddUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations