Democracy and Development: A Relationship of Harmony or Tension?

  • Matthew Louis Bishop


There is a general acceptance in both popular discourse and the more mainstream parts of political science and international studies that democracy and development are conducive to each other. However, this is an extremely problematic view. Both concepts are often taken at face value and rarely problematised: they remain inadequately understood by policymakers, analysts, and academics. Despite the fact that they reflect but one perspective among many, it is globally hegemonic, liberal understandings of both that have decisively shaped prevailing attitudes. Not only is this questionable intellectually, in that the belief that democracy and development exist in symbiosis rests on deeply political foundations, but the resultant practical attempts to promote them globally also embody a range of value-laden ideological characteristics. The argument advanced in the chapter is not that democracy and development are not, or cannot be, supportive of each other. Rather, I illustrate how, with reference to three distinct contemporary phenomena—ambiguities in the official global democracy and development agendas, new patterns of authoritarian resilience and development, and the emerging democratic and developmental crisis in the West—the relationship between the two is more complex, ambiguous, and contingent than it often appears.


  1. Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the twenty-first century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, M.D. 2012. The bonsai under the banyan tree: Democracy and democratisation in Singapore. Democratization 21(1): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beetham, D. 2009. The contradictions of democratization by force: The case of Iraq. Democratization 16(3): 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop, M.L. 2013. The political economy of Caribbean development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, M.L., and A. Payne. 2012. Climate change and the future of Caribbean development. The Journal of Development Studies 48(10): 1536–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbone, G. 2009. The consequences of democratization. Journal of Democracy 20(2): 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carothers, T. 2006. The backlash against democracy promotion. Foreign Affairs 85(2): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carothers, T. 2010. The continuing backlash against democracy promotion. In New challenges to democratization, ed. P.J. Burnell and R. Youngs, 59–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cerny, P.G. 2010. The competition state today: from raison d’État to raison du Monde Policy Studies. 31(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking away the ladder. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chang, H.-J. 2010. 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  12. Crouch, C. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crouch, C. 2013. The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, L. 2009. The shape of global democracy. Brown Journal of World Affairs 14(2): 77–86.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. 2012. The coming wave. Journal of Democracy 23(1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixon, M. 2011. An Arab spring. Review of African Political Economy 38(128): 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fine, B., J. Saraswati, and D. Tavasci. 2013. Beyond the developmental state: Industrial policy into the 21st century. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fukuyama, F. 2005. “Stateness” first. Journal of Democracy 16(1): 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukuyama, F. 2012. The patterns of history. Journal of Democracy 23(1): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamble, A. 2009. The western ideology. Government and Opposition 44(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gamble, A. 2014. Crisis without end?: The unravelling of western prosperity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geis, A., and W. Wagner. 2011. How far is it from Königsberg to Kandahar? Democratic peace and democratic violence in international relations. Review of International Studies 37(04): 1555–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilens, M., and B.I. Page. 2014. Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12(03): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilman, N. 2007. Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in cold war America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grugel, J. 2003. Democratisation studies globalisation: The coming of age of a paradigm. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(2): 258–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grugel, J., and M. Bishop. 2013. Democratization: A critical introduction, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison, G. 2010. Neoliberal Africa: The impact of global social engineering. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. 2014. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hay, C. 2007. Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hay, C., and A. Payne. 2013. The great uncertainty, SPERI Paper No. 5. Sheffield: Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI).Google Scholar
  31. Hay, C., and A. Payne. 2015. Civic capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hobson, C. 2011. Towards a critical theory of democratic peace. Review of International Studies 37(04): 1903–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobson, J.M. 2004. The eastern origins of western civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang, Y. 2014. Vulgarisation of Keynesianism in China’s response to the global financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy 1–31.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, O. 2014. The establishment: And how they get away with it. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Klein, N. 2007. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  37. Kotz, D. 2015. The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kyung-Sup, C., B. Fine, and L. Weiss (eds.). 2012. Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Leftwich, A. 2000. States of development: On the primacy of politics in development. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Leftwich, A. 2005. Politics in command: Development studies and the rediscovery of social science. New Political Economy 10(4): 573–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levitsky, S., and L.A. Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin, J.Y. 2011. Demystifying the Chinese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacKinnon, R. 2012. China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy 22(2): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy (Verso Books).Google Scholar
  45. Møller, J., and S.-E. Skaaning. 2011. Stateness first? Democratization 18(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mount, F. 2012. The new few: Or a very British oligarchy. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  47. Noueihed, L., and A. Warren. 2012. The battle for the Arab spring: Revolution, counter-revolution and the making of a new era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Payne, A. 2005. The global politics of unequal development. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Payne, A., and N. Phillips. 2010. Development. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pei, M. 2006. China’s trapped transition: The limits of developmental autocracy. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pei, M. 2012. Is CCP rule fragile or resilient? Journal of Democracy 23(1): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Plattner, M.F. 2004. A skeptical afterword. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Przeworski, A. 2004. Economic development and transitions to democracy. Working Paper. New York: New York University Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
  54. Ramsay, M. 2010. Liberal democratic politics as a form of violence. Democratization 17(2): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodrik, D. 2012. The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  56. Runciman, D. 2014. The confidence trap: A history of democracy in crisis from world war i to the present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stockemer, D. 2012. Regime type and good governance in low and high income states: What is the empirical link? Democratization 21(1): 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stoker, G. 2006. Why politics matters: Making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Tezcür, G.M. 2012. Democracy promotion, authoritarian resiliency, and political unrest in Iran. Democratization 19(1): 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thérien, J.-P. 1999. Beyond the north–south divide: The two tales of world poverty. Third World Quarterly 20(4): 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watson, M. 2005. Foundations of international political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waylen, G. 2007. Engendering transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitehead, L. 2009. Losing “the force”? The “dark side” of democratization after Iraq. Democratization 16(2): 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whitehead, L. 2010. State sovereignty and democracy: An awkward coupling. In New challenges to democratization, ed. P.J. Burnell and R. Youngs, 23–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Winters, J.A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeh, E.T., K.J. O’Brien, and J. Ye. 2013. Rural politics in contemporary China. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(6): 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, W. 2012. The China wave: Rise of a civilisational state. Hackensack, NJ: World Century.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Louis Bishop
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the West Indies, Trinidad and TobagoWest IndiesTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations