Researching with Working-Class Teenage Boys: A Working-Class Feminist Approach

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)


This chapter explores some of the issues related to the researcher’s position as a working-class woman who went to grammar school and then taught in both grammar and secondary schools, utilising researcher reflexivity. This chapter finishes with a brief discussion of the approach that was taken to the research and examines some of the initial school interactions, which are important to gaining an understanding of the institutional habitus of each school.


  1. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baszanger, I., & Dodier, N. (1997). Ethnography: Relating the part to the whole. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 8–23). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing, based on the BBC television series with John Berger. London/Harmondsworth: British Broadcasting Corporation/Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emmison, M. (2000). Researching the visual: Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Glen, S. (2000). The dark side of purity or the virtues of double-mindedness? In H. Simons & R. Usher (Eds.), Situated ethics in educational research. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Harper, D. (1998). An argument for visual sociology. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 24–41). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2007). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: Negotiating consent in child and youth-orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leitch, R. (2008). Researching children’s narratives creatively through drawings. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 33–39). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Mellor, J., Ingram, N., Abrahams, J., & Beedell, P. (2014). Class matters in the interview setting? Positionality, situatedness and social class. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Prosser, J. (1998). The status of image-based research. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 97–112). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  16. Reay, D. (2000). Children’s urban landscapes: Configurations of class and space. In S. Munt (Ed.), Cultural studies and the working class (pp. 151–164). New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  17. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Ward, M. R. M. (2015a). From labouring to learning, working-class masculinities, education and de-industrialization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Ward, M. R. M. (Ed.). (2016). Gender identity and research relationships, studies in qualitative methodology (Vol. 14). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  20. Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations