The Palgrave Handbook of Sexuality Education pp 655-672 | Cite as
Materialism and Micropolitics in Sexualities Education Research
Abstract
In this chapter, we establish a language and landscape for a new materialist practice of research in sexuality education. In the first section, we develop the materialist approach to sexuality and—by extension—sexuality education. Sexuality is not an attribute of a body, but an impersonal affective flow within assemblages of bodies, things, ideas, and social institutions, which produces sexual (and other) capacities in bodies. The second part of the chapter re-thinks social inquiry in terms of the micropolitics of the research-assemblage. From this perspective, research is a machine-like assemblage of things, people, ideas, social collectivities, and institutions. We conceptualise research as the hybridising of two assemblages: an ‘event-assemblage’ (for instance, some sexuality education practice) and a ‘research-assemblage’ comprising researcher, methods, audience, and contexts.
References
- Alldred, P., & David, M. (2007). Get real about sex. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Alldred, P., & Fox, N. J. (2015a). From ‘lesbian and gay psychology’ to a critical psychology of sexualities. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp. 200–209). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Alldred, P., & Fox, N. J. (2015b). The sexuality-assemblages of young men: A new materialist analysis. Sexualities, 18(8), 905–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen, L., & Carmody, M. (2012). Pleasure has no passport: Re-visiting the potential of pleasure in sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bale, C. (2011). Raunch or romance? Framing and interpreting the relationship between sexualized culture and young people’s sexual health. Sex Education, 11(3), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barad, K. (1997). Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In L. H. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science and the philosophy of science (pp. 161–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (2003). Performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beckman, F. (2011). Introduction: What is sex? An introduction to the sexual philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. In F. Beckman (Ed.), Deleuze and sex (pp. 1–29). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bogue, R. (2011). Alien sex: Octavia Butler and Deleuze and Guattari’s polysexuality. In F. Beckman (Ed.), Deleuze and sex (pp. 30–49). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1999). Revisiting bodies and pleasures. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(2), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clough, P. T. (2004). Future matters: Technoscience, global politics, and cultural criticism. Social Text, 22(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. H. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–45). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights. Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G. (2001). Dualism, monism and multiplicities (desire-pleasure-jouissance). Contretemps, 2, 92–108. Retrieved from http://www.usyd.edu.au/contretemps/contretemps2.html
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
- Eng, D. L., Halberstam, J., & Munoz, J. E. (2005). Introduction: What’s queer about queer studies now? Social Text, 23(3), 84–85.Google Scholar
- Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality Vol. 1: The will to knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1987). The history of sexuality Vol. 2: The use of pleasure. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality Vol. 3: The care of the self. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. Sociological Review, 61, 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2014). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(4), 399–414.Google Scholar
- Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). Inside the research-assemblage: New materialism and the micropolitics of social inquiry. Sociological Research Online, 20(2), 6. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/20/2/6.html. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2016). Sociology and the new materialism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Game, A. (1991). Undoing the social. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Gordo-Lopez, A. J., & Cleminson, R. M. (2004). Techno-sexual landscapes: Changing relations between technology and sexuality. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
- Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1998). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Holmes, D., OʼByrne, P., & Murray, S. J. (2010). Faceless sex: Glory holes and sexual assemblages. Nursing Philosophy: An International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 11(4), 250–259.Google Scholar
- Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24(3), 517–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, R. (1996). Sexual dissonances: Or the ‘impossibility’ of sexuality education. Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lambevski, S. A. (2004). Movement and desire: On the need to fluidify academic discourse on sexuality. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 10(2), 304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Linstead, S., & Pullen, A. (2006). Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion. Human Relations, 59(9), 1287–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masny, D. (2013). Rhizoanalytic pathways in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Potts, A. (2004). Deleuze on Viagra (Or, what can a Viagra-body do?). Body & Society, 10(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Probyn, E. (1995). Queer belongings: The politics of departure. In E. Grosz & E. Probyn (Eds.), Sexy bodies (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, M. L. (2012). Pleasure/desire, sexularism and sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girlsʼ sexual cultures in an era of “sexualization”. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomson, R. (1994). Moral rhetoric and public health pragmatism: The recent politics of sex education. Feminist Review, 48, 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thorogood, N. (2000). Sex education as disciplinary technique: Policy and practice in England and Wales. Sexualities, 3(4), 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2010). The transversality of new materialism. Women: A Cultural Review, 21(2), 153–171.Google Scholar
- Widder, N. (2012). Political theory after Deleuze. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Copyright information
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.