Advertisement

Theoretical Framework and Methodology

  • Ahmed Al-Rawi
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers background accounts on the use of various social media outlets in the Arab world with emphasis on YouTube. It also provides full details on the methodology and theoretical accounts on online religion, flaming, social movements, online activism, extremism, online communities, and selective exposure because of their relevance to the scope of this study.

Keywords

Social media Social networking sites Middle East Arabic 

References

  1. Abdallah, Shamsan. 2016. If you don’t post-, you will go to Hell. Huffington Post Arabi, January 1. Retrieved from http://www.huffpostarabi.com/shamsan-shamery/story_b_8851732.html.
  2. Akou, H.M. 2010. Interpreting Islam through the Internet: Making sense of hijab. Contemporary Islam 4 (3): 331–346.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Azmeh, A. 2009. Islams and modernities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Alexa. 2017. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com.
  5. Alexa: The Web Information Company. 2012. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com.
  6. Alexa: The Web Information Company. 2014. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com.
  7. Alonzo, M., and M. Aiken. 2004. Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems 36 (3): 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Rawi, A. 2014a. Cyber warriors in the Middle East: The case of the Syrian Electronic Army. Public Relations Review 40 (3): 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Rawi, A. 2014b. The Arab spring and online protests in Iraq. International Journal of Communication 8: 916–942.Google Scholar
  10. Al-Rawi, A. 2014c. Framing the online women’s movements in the Arab world. Information, Communication & Society 17 (4): 1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Al-Rawi, A. 2014d. The representation of September 11th and American Islamophobia in non-Western cinema. Media, War & Conflict 7 (2): 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Al-Rawi, A. 2015a. Sectarianism and the Arab spring: Framing the popular protests in Bahrain. Global Media and Communication 11 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Al-Rawi, A. 2015b. Online Reactions to the Muhammed Cartoons: YouTube and the virtual Ummah. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54 (2): 1–30.Google Scholar
  14. Al-Rawi, A. 2016. Facebook as a virtual mosque: The online protest against Innocence of Muslims. Culture & Religion 17 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  15. Al-Rawi, A. 2017. Facebook and virtual nationhood: Social media & the “Arab Canadian” online community. AI & Society. 1–33.Google Scholar
  16. An, J., D. Quercia, and J. Crowcroft. 2013. Fragmented social media: A look into selective exposure to political news. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, 51–52. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.Google Scholar
  17. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Anderson, Jon. 2003. The Internet and Islam’s new interpreters. In New media in the Muslim world, ed. Dale Eickelman and Jon W. Anderson, 45–60. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Arab Social Media Report. 2013. Transforming education in the Arab world: Breaking barriers in the age of social learning, 5th ed., June 23. Retrieved from http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com/UserManagement/PDF/ASMR_5_Report_Final.pdf.
  20. Associated Press. 2012. Bahrain court jails man over Muhammad wife insult, August 13.Google Scholar
  21. Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
  22. Bayat, A. 2005. Islamism and social movement theory. Third World Quarterly 26 (6): 891–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. BBC. 2012. Saudi detained in Malaysia for insulting Prophet tweet, February10. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16977903.
  24. BBC Magazine. 2015. Viewpoint: Who are the people in the dark corners? April 28. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32446711.
  25. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedoms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Bennett, L. 2003. Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society 6 (2): 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bennett, W.L., and A. Segerberg. 2011. Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis. Information, Communication & Society 14 (6): 770–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Boase, J., J.B. Horrigan, B. Wellman, and L. Rainie. 2006. The strength of ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_internet_ties.pdf.
  29. Boyd, Danah, and N.B. Ellison. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Brundidge, J., and R.E. Rice. 2009. Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar. In Routledge handbook of Internet politics, ed. A. Chadwick, and P.N. Howard, 144–156. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Bunt, Gary. 2000. Virtually Islamic: Computer-mediated communication and cyber Islamic environments. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  32. Bunt, Gary. 2003. Islam in the digital age: E-Jihad, Online fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  33. Bunt, Gary. 2009. iMuslims: Rewiring the house of Islam. Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  34. Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Calhoun, Craig. 2004. Information technology and the international public sphere. In Shaping the network society: The new role of civil society in cyberspace, ed. Douglas Schuler and Peter Day, 229–251. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Campbell, Heidi. 2010. When religion meets new media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Campbell, Heidi. 2012. Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a networked society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80 (1): 64–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Carragee, K.M., and W. Roefs. 2004. The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication 54 (2): 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Carroll, W., and R. Hackett. 2006. Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture and Society 28 (1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Casciani, Dominic. 2015. The battle of the e-Muftis. BBC Magazine, May 12. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32697424.
  41. Castells, Manuel. 2001. The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Castells, Manuel. 2008. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. CBCNews. 2010. Canadian-Arab Christians targeted on website. December 21. Retrieved 12 Aug 2012. Available at http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2010/12/21/christians-targeted.html.
  44. Chadwick, A., and P. Howard (eds.). 2009. Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Chaffee, S.H., M.N. Saphir, J. Grap, C. Sandvig, and K.S. Hahn. 2001. Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication 18: 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Chang, W.Y. 2005. Online civic participation and political empowerment. Media, Culture and Society 27: 925–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Choi, Y.J., and J.H. Lee. 2006. The role of a scene in framing a story: An analysis of a scene’s position, length, and proportion. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50 (4): 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Christensen, Christian. 2007. YouTube: The evolution of media. Screen Education 45: 36–40.Google Scholar
  49. Coleman, R. 2010. Framing the pictures in our Heads. Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In Doing news framing analysis. Empirical and theoretical perspectives, ed. P. D’ Angelo and J.A. Kuypers, 233–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. comScore. 2011. More than 200 Billion Online Videos Viewed Globally in October. December 14. Retrieved 4 Jan 2012. Available at http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/12/More_than_200_Billion_Online_Videos_Viewed_Globally_in_October.
  51. Constantinescu, A.R., and J.C. Tedesco. 2007. Framing a kidnapping: Frame convergence between online newspaper coverage and reader discussion posts about three kidnapped Romanian journalists 1. Journalism Studies 8 (3): 444–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Conway, Maura, and Lisa McInerney. 2008. Jihadi video and auto-radicalisation: Evidence from an exploratory YouTube study. Intelligence and Security Informatics 5376: 108–118.Google Scholar
  53. Cooper, J. 2007. Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Cooper, S. 2010. The oppositional framing of bloggers. In Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical perspectives, ed. P. D’Angelo and J.A. Kuypers, 135–155. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Copley, Caroline. 2016. Germany’s finance minister presses for a ‘German Islam’. Reuters, October 2. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-islam-idUSKCN1220KC.
  56. Cotton, J. 2013. Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In Selective exposure to communication, ed. D. Zillmann and J. Bryant, 11–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Dahlberg, L. 2007. The internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 3: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. D’Angelo, P. 2002. News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication 52 (4): 870–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Das, S, M. Chen. 2001. Yahoo! for Amazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific finance association annual conference (APFA), 43.Google Scholar
  61. Della Porta, D., and M. Diani. 2006. Social movements: An introduction. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Diakopoulos N, and D. Shamma. 2010. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1195–1198.Google Scholar
  63. Donsbach, W. 1991. Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers’ selectivity. European Journal of Communication 6: 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Douai, Aziz, and Hala K. Nofal. 2012. Commenting in the online Arab public sphere: Debating the Swiss Minaret Ban and the ‘‘Ground Zero Mosque’’ online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Dubai School of Government. 2011. Arab Social Media Report. Vol. 1, No. 1, January. Retrieved from http://www.dsg.ae/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=D5VOQg4MsB0=.
  66. Dubai School of Government. 2012. Social Media in the Arab World: Influencing Societal and Cultural Change? Vol. 2, No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.mbrsg.ae/getattachment/6fff5f9f-add5-48d2-8b24-3f4c6acebb66/The- Fourth-Arab-Social-Media-Report-Influencing-So.
  67. Dubai School of Government. 2013. The Arab World Online: Trends in Internet Usage in the Arab Region, April 22. Retrieved from http://www.dsg.ae/en/Publication/Pdf_En/424201311017185100000.pdf.
  68. Dunn, Gaby. 2013. YouTube finally cracks down on notoriously heinous comment sections. The Daily Dot, September 25. Retrieved from http://www.dailydot.com/news/youtube-comment-system-google-plus/.
  69. Ellison, N.B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. 2011. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society 13 (6): 873–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. El-Nawawy, Mohammed, and Sahar Khamis. 2009. Islam dot Com: Contemporary Islamic discourse in cyberspace. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Entman, R.M. 1991. Symposium framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication 41 (4): 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Entman, R.M. 2003. Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication 20 (4): 415–432.Google Scholar
  74. Etling, B., J. Kelly, R. Faris, and J. Palfrey. 2010. Mapping the Arabic blogosphere: Politics and dissent online. New Media & Society 12 (8): 1225–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Fang, L. 2017. California nonprofit may have violated tax law by donating to Anti-Muslim, Far-Right Dutch candidate. The Intercept, March 3 Retrieved from https://theintercept.com/2017/03/03/geert-wilders-freedomcenters/.
  76. Feldman, M. 2012. Viewpoint: Killer Breivik’s links with far right. BBC News, August 27. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19366000.
  77. Feldman, S., and J. Zaller. 1992. The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Feldman, L., E.W. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, and A. Leiserowitz. 2012. Climate on cable The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Galston, W.A. 2003. If political fragmentation is the problem, is the Internet the solution? In The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, ed. D.M. Anderson, and M. Cornfield, 35–44. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  80. Gamson, W.A. 1992. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Gamson, W.A., and K.E. Lasch. 1983. The political culture of social welfare policy. In Evaluating the welfare state: Social and political perspectives, ed. S.E. Spiro, and E. Yuchtman-Yaar, 397–415. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Graf, J., and S. Aday. 2008. Selective attention to online political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52: 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Groshek, Jacob, and Ahmed Al-Rawi. 2013. Public sentiment and critical framing in social media content during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Gulalp, H. 2003. Whatever happened to secularization? The multiple Islams in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly 102 (2): 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hakim, D., and C. Schuetze. 2017. Before elections, Dutch fear Russian meddling, but Also U.S. Cash. The New York Times, March 7. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/07/world/europe/before-elections-dutch-fear-russian-meddling-but-also-us-cash.html?_r=0.
  87. Halpern, D., and J. Gibbs. 2013. Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (3): 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Herring, D. 2005. Virtual as contextual: A net news theology. In Religion and cyberspace, ed. L. Dawson and D. Cowan, 149–165. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Hoover, S., L. Schofield Clarke, and D. Rainie. 2004. Faith online. Pew Internet and American life project, April 7. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2004/PIP_Faith_Online_2004.pdf.pdf.
  90. Hornig, S. 1992. Framing risk: Audience and reader factors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 69 (3): 679–690.Google Scholar
  91. Howard, Philip. 2011. The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Hume, T., and L. Said-Moorhouse. 2016. Francois Hollande: ‘Islam of France’ needed to beat terror threat. CNN, September 8. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/08/europe/france-hollande-islam-secularism/.
  93. Internet World Stat. 2015. Internet Usage in the Middle East. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats5.htm.
  94. Internet World Stats. 2017a. Middle East. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats5.htm.
  95. Internet World Stats. 2017b. Africa. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm.
  96. Iyengar, S., and K.S. Hahn. 2009. Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Jarrett, K. 2010. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 24 (2): 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Jenkins, J.Craig. 1981. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Johnson, T.J., S.L. Bichard, and W. Zhang. 2009. Communication communities or “CyberGhettos?”: A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to Blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15 (1): 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Johnson, T.J., W. Zhang, and S.L. Bichard. 2011. Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political websites. Social Science Computer Review 29 (4): 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Journalism.org. 2012. ‘YouTube & News: A New Kind of Visual News’, July 16. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/youtube_news. Accessed 18 July 2012.
  102. Juris, J.S. 2005. Networked social movements: Global movements for global justice. In The network society: A cross-cultural perspective, ed. Manuel Castells. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  103. Karim, H. Karim. 2007. Media and diaspora. In Media studies: Key issues & debates, ed. Eoin Devereux, 361–379. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  104. Kaylor, Brian. 2012. Cartoonish claims: Editorial cartoon depictions of religion. Mass Communication and Society 15 (2): 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kazem, Halima. 2016. Funding Islamophobia: $206 m went to promoting ‘hatred’ of American Muslims. The Guardian, June 20. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/20/islamophobia-funding-cair-berkeley-report.
  106. Keren, M. 2006. Blogosphere: The new political arena. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  107. Kahn, R., and Kellner, D. 2004. New media activism: from the battle of Seattle to blogging. New Media & Society 6 (1): 87–95.Google Scholar
  108. Kluver, R., and Cheong, P. H. 2007. Technological modernization, the Internet, and religion in Singapore. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 12 (3): 1122–1142.Google Scholar
  109. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and J. Meng. 2008. Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, May in Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  110. Kushin, M. J., and K. Kitchener. 2009. Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday 14 (11).Google Scholar
  111. Landis, J.Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Lee, J.K., Choi, J., Kim, C., and Kim, Y. 2014. Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of communication 64 (4): 702–722.Google Scholar
  113. Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C.C. Bracken. 2002. Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Mandaville, Peter. 2001. Transnational Muslim politics: Reimagining the Umma. London: Routeldge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Mandaville, Peter. 2003. Communication and diasporic Islam: A virtual Ummah? In The Media of diaspora, ed. Karim H. Karim, pp. 135–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  116. May, A.L. 2010. Who tube? How YouTube’s news and politics space is going mainstream. The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (4): 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. McAdam, D., J.D. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald. 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Meffert, M.F., S. Chung, A.J. Joiner, L. Waks, and J. Garst. 2006. The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication 56 (1): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Meraz, S., and Z. Papacharissi. 2013. Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on# Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18 (2): 138–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Messaris, P., and L. Abraham. 2001. The role of images in framing news stories. In Framing public life, ed. S. Reese, O. Gandy, and A. Grant, 215–226. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  122. Mutz, D.C., and P.S. Martin. 2001. Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review 95 (1): 97–114.Google Scholar
  123. Neumayer, C. 2012. Which alternative? A critical analysis of YouTube-comments in anti-fascist protest. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10 (1): 56–65.Google Scholar
  124. Nisbet, Matthew. 2010. Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In Doing framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives, ed. Paul D’Angelo and Jim Kuypers, 43–83. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  125. Northwestern University in Qatar. 2013. Media use in the Middle East: An Eight-Nation survey by northwestern University in Qatar, June 18. Retrieved from http://menamediasurvey.northwestern.edu/.
  126. O’Sullivan, Patrick B., and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2003. Reconceptualizing “flaming” and other problematic communication. New Media and Society 5 (1): 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. O’Connor, B., R. Balasubramanyan, B. Routledge, and N. Smith. 2010. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM 11: 1–2.Google Scholar
  128. Olesen, T. 2009. The Muhammad cartoons conflict and transnational activism. Ethnicities 9 (3): 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Pan, Z. P., and G. M. Kosicki. 1993. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10 (1): 55–75.Google Scholar
  130. Pang, B., and L. Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2 (1–2): 1–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Pang B., L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, 79–86. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  132. Papacharissi, Z. 2002. The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society 4: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Price, Vincent, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2002. Online deliberation and its influence: The electronic dialogue project in Campaign 2000. IT & Society 1 (1): 303–329.Google Scholar
  134. Reese, Stephen D. 2001. Prologue-Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, ed. S. Reese, O. Gandy, and A. Grant, 7–31. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  135. Reuters. 2016. Ruling in the age of Twitter…The new way Saudi princes take decisions and consult people. Retrieved from http://marebpress.net/news_details.php?lang=arabic&sid=119597, May 25.
  136. Rieder, Bernhard. 2015. YouTube Data Tools. Computer software 1 (0): 5.Google Scholar
  137. Roy, Olivier. 2004. Globalized Islam: The search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Said, E. 2001. The clash of ignorance. The Nation, 22.Google Scholar
  139. Saunders, Robert. 2008. The Ummah as nation: A reappraisal in the wake of the ‘cartoons affair. Nations and Nationalism 14 (2): 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Scheufele, D.A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication 49 (1): 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Segerberg, A., and W.L. Bennett. 2011. Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review 14 (3): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Semiocast. 2011. Arabic highest growth on Twitter: English expression stabilizes under 40%. November 24. Retrieved from http://semiocast.com/publications/2011_11_24_Arabic_highest_growth_on_Twitter, Dec 12.
  143. SimilarWeb. 2017. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.similarweb.com/website/youtube.com.
  144. Snow, D. A., S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi. 2008. Mapping the Terrain. In The Blackwell companion to social movements, Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & (Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  145. Sotirovic, M. 2000. Effects of media use on audience framing and support for welfare. Mass Communication & Society 3 (2–3): 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Spears, R., T. Postmes, M. Lea, and A. Wolbert. 2002. The power of influence and the influence of power in virtual groups: A SIDE look at CMC and the internet. Journal of Social Issues 58: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Stout, D.A., and J.M. Buddenbaum. 2002. Genealogy of an emerging field: Foundations for the study of media and religion. Journal of Media and Religion 1: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Strangelove, Michael. 2010. Watching YouTube: Extraordinary videos by ordinary people. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  149. Stroud, N.J. 2010. Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication 60 (3): 556–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Suler, J. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7 (3): 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Sunstein, C. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  152. Sunstein, C.R. 2009. Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Taboada, M., J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 37 (2): 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Tankard, James W. 2003. The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, ed. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant, 95–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  155. Thelwall, Michael. 2009. Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
  156. Thelwall, Mike, Pardeep Sud, and Farida Vis. 2011. Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (3): 616–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Theobald, Simon. 2009. Faith, interfaith, and YouTube: Dialogue, or derision? Literature & Aesthetics 19 (2): 326–342.Google Scholar
  158. Thorson, Kjerstin, Brian Ekdale, Porismita Borah, Kang Namkoong, and Chirag Shah. 2010. YouTube and proposition 8. Information, Communication & Society 13 (3): 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Tilly, Charles. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  160. Tong, R. 2001. An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussion. In Working notes of the ACM SIGIR 2001 workshop on operational text classification, p. 6.Google Scholar
  161. Townsend, Mark. 2017. Britain’s extremist bloggers helping the ‘altright’ go global, report finds. The Guardian, February 11. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/11/how-britains-extremist-bloggers-helped-the-alt-right-go-global.
  162. Tsfati, Y., N.J. Stroud, and A. Chotiner. 2013. Exposure to ideological news and perceived opinion climate: Testing the media effects component of spiral-of-silence in a fragmented media landscape. The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Turow, J. 1997. Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Uldam, J., and T. Askanius. 2013. Online Civic cultures? Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication 7 (20): 1185–1204.Google Scholar
  165. Van Dijck, J., and T. Poell. 2014. Making public television social? Public service broadcasting and the challenges of social media. Television & New Media, 1527476414527136.Google Scholar
  166. Van Dijk, T.A. 1998. Opinion and ideologies in the press. In Approaches to media discourse, ed. A. Bell and P. Garrett, 22–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  167. Van Gorp, Baldwin. 2010. Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives, ed. Paul D’Angelo and Jim A. Kuypers, 84–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  168. Volkmer, I. 2003. The global network society and the global public sphere. Development 46 (1): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Vox. 2016. What does it mean to be Muslim? There are 1.7 billion answers. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/videos/2016/11/21/13697910/what-is-a-muslim, November 21.
  170. Webster, J.G., and T.B. Ksiazek. 2012. The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication 62 (1): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. West, G., and R. Blumberg. 1991. Reconstructing social protest from a feminist perspective. In Women and social protest, ed. G. West and R.L. Blumberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  172. Wikileaks. 2008. Wilders film update: Pandith Meetings with Dutch government and civil society. Confidential. The Hague. 08THEHAGUE133_a, February 13. Retrieved from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08THEHAGUE133_a.html.
  173. Wimmer, R.D., and J.R. Dominick. 1994. An introduction to mass media research. California: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  174. Wojcieszak, M. 2010. ‘Don’t talk to me’: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society 12 (4): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Xenos, M. 2008. New mediated deliberation: Blog and press coverage of the Alito nomination. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2): 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Young, G. 2004. Reading and praying online: The continuity of religion online and online religion in internet Christianity. In Religion online: Finding faith on the Internet, ed. L.L. Dawson and D.E. Cowan, 93–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  177. YouTube Statistics. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics.
  178. Zald, M., and D. McCarthy (eds.). 1987. Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  179. Zillmann, D., and J. Bryant (eds.). 2013. Selective exposure to communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Al-Rawi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations