Advertisement

Historical (Im)politeness

  • Andreas H. JuckerEmail author
  • Joanna Kopaczyk
Chapter

Abstract

Drawing on earlier approaches to politeness and impoliteness, this chapter shows their applicability to historical contexts. Early work tends to analyse historical data on the basis of Brown and Levinson’s approach to politeness as a face-threat mitigation strategy. Later work extends the scope to discursive approaches focussing on explicit negotiations of politeness values and the analysis of meta-communicative expressions relating to politeness and impoliteness. The chapter illustrates the most recent approaches with two case studies. The first one traces lexical items in the semantic field of (Im)politeness, such as civility, courtesy, rudeness or impoliteness, in the history of the English language. The second shows how impoliteness can be constructed discursively in a verbal duel between two Scottish Renaissance writers, William Dunbar and Walter Kennedy.

Keywords

Nominal Term Semantic Field Linguistic Behaviour Discursive Approach Diachronic Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aiden, Erez, and Jean-Baptiste Michel. 2013. Uncharted Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ameka, Felix. 1992a. Interjections: The Universal Yet Neglected Part of Speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (2/3): 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1992b. The Meaning of Phatic and Conative Interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (2/3): 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, Dawn. 2005. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnovick, Leslie K. 1995. Sounding and Flyting the English Agonistic Insult: Writing Pragmatic History in a Cross-Cultural Context. In The Twenty-First LACUS Forum 1994, ed. Mava Jo Powell, 600–619. Chapel Hill: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1999. Diachronic Pragmatics. Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  7. Bawcutt, Priscilla. 1983. The Art of Flyting. Scottish Literary Journal 10 (2): 5–24.Google Scholar
  8. ———, ed. 1998. The Poems of William Dunbar, 2 vols. Glasgow: ASLS.Google Scholar
  9. Bax, Marcel M.H. 1999. Ritual Levelling: The Balance Between the Eristic and the Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal Encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama. In Historical Dialogue Analysis, ed. Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz, and Franz Lebsanft, 35–80. Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bax, Marcel. 2010. Rituals. In Historical Pragmatics, Handbooks of Pragmatics 8, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 483–519. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  11. Bax, Marcel, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. The Historical Understanding of Historical (Im)politeness. Introductory Notes. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12.1 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Bentivoglio, Paola. 2003. Spanish Forms of Address in the Sixteenth Century. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107, ed. Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 177–191. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, eds. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures, Contributions to the Sociology of Language 50. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Style in Language, ed. Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1989. Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies. Language in Society 18 (2): 159–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage, Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Burnley, David. 2003. The T/V Pronouns in Later Middle English Literature. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107, ed. Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 27–45. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burrow, John A. 2006. William Dunbar. In A Companion to Medieval Scottish Poetry, ed. Priscilla Bawcutt and Janet Hadley Willaims, 133–148. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  23. Busse, Ulrich. 2002a. Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus. Morpho-Syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2002b. Changing Politeness Strategies in English Requests: A Diachronic Investigation. In Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 17–35. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2009. The Metalanguage of Impoliteness: Using Sketch Engine to Explore the Oxford English Corpus. In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. Paul Baker, 64–86. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2010. Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–3245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2011. Impoliteness Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. 2000. Data in Historical Pragmatics: Spoken Discourse (Re)Cast as Writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (2): 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing, Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2010. Historical (Im)politeness. An introduction. In Historical (Im)politeness (Linguistic Insights 65), ed. Jonathan Culpeper and Dániel Z. Kádár, 9–36. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Daly, Nicola, Janet Holmes, Jonathan Newton, and Maria Stubbe. 2004. Expletives as Solidarity Signals in FTAs on the Factory Floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 945–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two Polite Speech Acts from a Diachronic Perspective: Aspects of the Realisation of Requesting and Undertaking Commitments in the Nineteenth-Century Commercial Community. In Speech Acts in the History of English, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 115–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Denizot, Camille. 2012. Impolite Orders in Ancient Greek?: The οὐκ ἐρεῖς; type. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13 (1): 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories, Encounters 1. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
  37. Ewan, Elizabeth. 2002. ‘Many Injurious Words’: Defamation and Gender in Late Medieval Scotland. In History, Literature, and Music in Scotland, 700–1560, ed. R. Andrew McDonald, 163–186. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  38. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Gehweiler, Elke. 2008. From Proper Name to Primary Interjections. The Case of Gee! Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 71–93.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2010. Interjections and Expletives. In Historical Pragmatics, Handbooks of Pragmatics 8, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 315–349. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  41. Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2003. Politeness Distinctions in Second Person Pronouns. In Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person, ed. Friedrich Lenz, 185–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2005. Typologie und Diffusion von Höflichkeitspronomina in Europa. Folia Linguistica 49 (3–4): 417–451.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2013. Politeness Distinctions in Pronouns. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/45. Accessed on 17 Apr 2015.
  44. Hughes, Geoffrey. 1991. Swearing. A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Hunt, Tony. 2003. The Use of tu/vus in the Anglo-Norman Seinte Resureccion. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107, ed. Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, 47–59. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  46. Jay, Timothy. 1992. Cursing in America: A Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards and on the Streets. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2000a. English Historical Pragmatics: Problems of Data and Methodology. In English Diachronic Pragmatics, ed. Gabriella di Martino and Maria Lima, 17–55. CUEN: Napoli.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2000b. Slanders, Slurs and Insults on the Road to Canterbury. Forms of Verbal Aggression in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. In Placing Middle English in Context, Topics in English Linguistics 35, ed. Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Päivi Pahta, and Matti Rissanen, 369–389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2010. ‘In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Historical (Im)politeness, Linguistic Insights 65, ed. Jonathan Culpeper and Dániel Z. Kádár, 175–200. Frankfurt a. M: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2012a. Changes in Politeness Cultures. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott, 422–433. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2012b. ‘These Imputations are Too Common, Sir’: Politeness in Early Modern English Dialogues: The Case of Ben Jonson’s Volpone, or The Fox. In Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue, Metodi e Prospettive, ed. Gabriella Mazzon and Luisanna Fodde, 40–58. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2014. Courtesy and Politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49 (3): 5–28.Google Scholar
  53. Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults From Flyting to Flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jucker, Andreas H., Irma Taavitsainen, and Gerold Schneider. 2012. Semantic Corpus Trawling: Expressions of ‘Courtesy’ and ‘Politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus. In Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics, Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11, ed. Carla Suhr and Irma Taavitsainen. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/11/prag/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/.
  55. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kinsley, James, ed. 1979. The Poems of William Dunbar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  57. Koch, Peter. 1999. Court Records and Cartoons: Reflections of Spontaneous Dialogue in Early Romance Texts. In Historical Dialogue Analysis, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 66, ed. Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz, and Franz Lebsanft, 399–429. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kohnen, Thomas. 2008a. Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness? In Speech Acts in the History of English, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 27–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 2008b. Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A Study of Old English Address Terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2011. Understanding Anglo-Saxon ‘Politeness’: Directive Constructions with ic wille/ic wolde. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 230–254.Google Scholar
  61. Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite Discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 1995. Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35, ed. Andreas H. Jucker, 515–540. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kytö, Merja. 2010. Data in Historical Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, Handbooks of Pragmatics 8, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 33–67. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  64. Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  65. Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33.Google Scholar
  66. Mapping Metaphor with the Historical Thesaurus. 2015. Metaphor Map of English. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. http://mappingmetaphor.arts.gla.ac.uk. Accessed Aug 2015.
  67. Mazzon, Gabriella. 2010. Terms of Address. In Historical Pragmatics, Handbooks of Pragmatics 8, ed. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 351–376. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  68. Meier, Nicole, ed. 2008. The Poems of Walter Kennedy. The Scottish Text Society. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  69. Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, The Google Books Team, Joseph P. Pickett, Dale Hoiberg, Dan Clancy, Peter Norvig, Jon Orwant, Steven Pinker, Martin A. Nowak, Erez Lieberman Aiden. 2010. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 14 (331). http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2010/12/15/science.1199644.
  70. Montagu, Ashley. 1967. The Anatomy of Swearing. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  71. O’Driscoll, Jim. 2007. Brown & Levinson’s Face: How It Can – and Can’t – Help Us to Understand Interaction Across Cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4): 463–492.Google Scholar
  72. Pakis, Valentina A. 2011. Insults, Violence, and the Meaning of lytegian in the Old English Battle of Maldon. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 198–229.Google Scholar
  73. Stewart, Miranda. 2005. Politeness in Britain: ‘It’s only a Suggestion…’. In Politeness in Europe, ed. Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 116–129. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  74. Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. Andreas H. Jucker, 439–465. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. ———. 1997. By Saint Tanne’: Pious Oaths or Swearing in Middle English? An Assessment of Genres. In Language History and Linguistics Modelling. A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, ed. Raymond Hickey and Stanislaw Puppel, 815–826. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  76. ———. 1998. Emphatic Language and Romantic Prose: Changing Functions of Interjections in a Sociocultural Perspective. European Journal of English Studies 2 (2): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker, eds. 2003. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  78. Tasioulas, Jacqueline, ed. 1999. The Makars. The Poems of Henryson, Dunbar and Douglas. Edinburgh: Canongate.Google Scholar
  79. Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Buuren, Catherine. 2001. The Chepman and Myllar Texts of Dunbar. In William Dunbar, ‘The Nobill Poyet’. Essays in Honour of Priscilla Bawcutt, ed. Sally Mapstone. Edinburgh: Tuckwell Press.Google Scholar
  82. Wajnryb, Ruth. 2004. Language Most Foul. Allen & Unwin: Crows Nest.Google Scholar
  83. Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 1992. Introduction. In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  84. Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. Anglo scripts Against ‘Putting Pressure’ on Other People and Their Linguistic Manifestations. In Ethnopragmatics. Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context, ed. Cliff Goddard, 31–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations