Participatory Development: A Sustainable Approach for Reducing Inequality and Fighting Poverty? The Example of Disability Policies in Afghanistan

  • Parul Bakhshi
  • Jean-François Trani
Part of the Rethinking International Development series book series (RID)


In this chapter, Bakhshi and Trani take discussions of empowerment and participation from a capability perspective further. They argue that despite the well-intended claims of international frameworks and actors, ownership and empowerment have been misused in development practice as well as theory. Development efforts can be criticised for failing to take into consideration the voices of the most vulnerable in given contexts. This is illustrated with reference to the evolution of a disability programme in post-Taliban Afghanistan. The first part of their chapter shows that most development programmes, including the Afghan project, define participation in narrow terms to involve little more than basic service delivery communicated through ‘consultations’ with select local stakeholders. The agency aspect of the capability approach, which has the potential to empower the marginalised and socially excluded, is lost altogether. The second part of their chapter shows how the absence of well-defined principles for participation and effective change in fragile contexts, such as Afghanistan, affects progress towards improving the lives of aid ‘recipients’ and pose serious threats to the sustainability of development projects. The authors advance strong arguments for involving the ‘recipients of aid’ in all phases of development projects and for transferring power to enhance agency.


  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AREU. (2010, April). Grounding International Engagement in Afghan Realities: A Statement by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit on the Occasion of the London and Kabul Conferences on Afghanistan. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Last accessed 11 Dec 2014.
  3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, P. (1971). Dissent on Development: Studies and Debates in Development Economics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  5. Bosher, L., Penning-Rowsell, E., & Tapsell, S. (2007). Resource Accessibility and Vulnerability in Andhra Pradesh: Caste and Non-Caste Influences. Development and Change, 38(4), 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brighouse, H., & Unterhalter, E. (2014). Primary Goods, Capabilities and the Millennium Development Target of Gender Equity in Education. In F. Comim & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality: Towards Fundamental Entitlements (pp. 215–243). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Central Statistics Organization. (2014). National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment 2011–12 (Afghanistan Living Conditions Survey). Kabul, Afghanistan: Central Statistics Organization.Google Scholar
  8. Cerveau, T. (2011). Deconstructing Myths; Facing Reality. Understanding Social Representations of Disability in Afghanistan. In J. F. Trani (Ed.), Development Efforts in Afghanistan: Is There a Will and a Way? The Case of Disability and Vulnerability (pp. 103–122). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, R. (2004). Ideas for Development: Reflecting Forwards (IDS Working Paper 238). Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Coleridge, P. (1998). Development, Cultural Values and Disability: The Example of Afghanistan. In E. Stone (Ed.), Disability and Development (pp. 149–167). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coleridge, P. (2002). Community Based Rehabilitation in a Complex Emergency: Study of Afghanistan. In M. Thomas & M. J. Thomas (Eds.), Selected Readings in CBR – Series 2: Disability and Rehabilitation Issues in South Asia (pp. 35–49). Bangalore, India: National Printing Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dabelstein, N., & Patton, M. Q. (2013). The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: History and Significance. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 27(3), 19–36.Google Scholar
  13. Datta, C. (2003). Participation of the People. In A. Cornwall & G. Pratt (Eds.), Pathways to Participation: Reflections on PRA (pp. 54–59). London: ITDG Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dijkstra, G. (2005). The PRSP Approach and the Illusion of Improved Aid Effectiveness: Lessons from Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua. Development and Policy Review, 23(4), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Djankov, S., Montalvo, G. V., & Reynal-Querol, N. (2006). Does Foreign Aid Help? Cato Journal, 26(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  16. Djankov, S., Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2008). The Curse of Aid. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(3), 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubois, J. L., Brouillet, A. S., Bakhshi, P., & Duray-Soundron, C. (Eds.). (2008). Repenser l’action collective. Une approche par les capabilités [Rethinking Collective Action: A Capabilities Approach]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  18. Dubois, J. L., & Trani, J. F. (2009). Extending the Capability Paradigm to Address the Complexity of Disability. ALTER European Journal of Disability Research, 3(3), 192–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eyben, R. (2006). The Road Not Taken: International Aid’s Choice of Copenhagen Over Beijing. Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eyben, R. (2008). Power, Mutual Accountability and Responsibility in the Practice of International Aid: A Relational Approach (IDS Working Paper 305). Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrero, G., & Zepeda, C. (2014). Rethinking Development Management Methodology: Towards a “Process Freedoms Approach”. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(1), 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frediani, A. A., Boni, A., & Gasper, D. (2014). Approaching Development Projects from a Human Development and Capability Perspective. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gautron, B., & Jarrar, A. (1996). Report on a Mid term Evaluation. Kabul, Afghanistan: CDAP/UNOPS.Google Scholar
  24. Gupta, A. K. (2012). Innovations for the Poor by the Poor. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 5(1–2), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2005). Relocating Participation Within a Radical Politics of Development. Development and Change, 36(2), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovmand, P. S. (2014). Community Based System Dynamics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ibrahim, S. (2006). From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-Help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35(4), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ikram, T. (2000). UN Steps Up Appeals to Help Afghan Mine Survivors, Reuters, Islamabad, 28 April. Last accessed 30 Dec 2014.
  30. Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khan, S. R. (2003). Participation Via Collective Action in Government and NGO Schools in Pakistan. Development in Practice, 13(4), 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krefting, L., & Krefting, D. (2001). The Future of Disability Work in Afghanistan. Asia and Pacific Journal on Disability, 4(2), 35–42.Google Scholar
  34. Kristiansson, B. (1990). Report on Rehabilitation Services in Kabul’. UNOCA, Peshawar, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  35. Kristiansson, B. (1991). Report on Takhar Mission. Disabled Afghan Project, Peshawar, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  36. Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2017). Which Inclusive Innovation? Competing Normative Assumptions Around Social Justice. Innovation and Development, advanced access.
  37. Miles, M. (1990). Disability and Afghan reconstruction: Some Policy Issues. Disability, Handicap and Society, 5(3), 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miles, M. (2002). Formal and Informal Disability Resources for Afghan Reconstruction. Third World Quarterly, 23(5), 945–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, K., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M., Nasiry, S., et al. (2006). The Afghan Symptom Checklist: A Culturally Grounded Approach to Mental Health Assessment in a Conflict Zone. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(4), 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Molenaers, N., & Renard, R. R. (2003). The World Bank, Participation and PRSP: The Bolivian Case Revisited. European Journal of Development Research, 15(2), 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moss, T., Pettersson, G., & Van de Walle, N. (2006). An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A Review Essay on Aid Dependency and State Building in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: Center for Global Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Musyoki, S. (2002). Can Bilateral Programmes Become Learning Organisations? Experiences From Institutionalising Participation in Keiyo Marakwet in Kenya. Development in Practice, 12(3), 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norgrove, P., Zulianello, R., Dreise, M., & Steenbeek, M. (2007). Community-Based Rehabilitation and Orthopaedic Surgery for Children with Motor Impairment in an African Context. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29(11–12), 839–843.Google Scholar
  44. O’Toole, B., & Maison-Halls, G. (1994). Community-Based Rehabilitation and Development: Disabled Children in Guyana. Development in Practice, 4(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD/DAC. (2005). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD/DAC.Google Scholar
  46. Papaioannou, T. (2011). Technological Innovation, Global Justice and Politics of Development. Progress in Development Studies, 11(4), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rasmussen, A., Ventevogel, P., Sancilio, A., Eggerman, M., & Panter-Brick, C. (2014). Comparing the Validity of the Self Reporting Questionnaire and the Afghan Symptom Checklist: Dysphoria, Aggression, and Gender in Transcultural Assessment of Mental Health. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1).
  48. Rathnam, M., Lang, R., & Reha, M. (2003). Comprehensive Disabled Afghans’ Programme – CDAP. External Evaluation Mission Report, June 15. Available from UNDP Evaluation Resource Centre.
  49. Rowlands, J. (1997), Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras. Oxfam: Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and Capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart, F. (2014). Why Horizontal Inequalities are Important for a Shared Society. Development, 57(1), 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trani J. F. (2004). A New Structure in the Government of Afghanistan for the Promotion of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The National Disability Commission (NDC). Report to the Minister of Martyrs and Disabled, Kabul, Afghanistan.Google Scholar
  55. Trani, J. F., & Bakhshi, P. (2007). Vulnerability and Basic Capabilities Deprivation: A Gender Analysis of Disability, Vulnerability and Empowerment in Afghanistan. Paper presented at the 2007 Conference of the Human Development and Capabilities Association: “Ideas Changing History”, September 16–20, The New School, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Trani, J. F., & Bakhshi, P. (2011). Profiling and Understanding People with Disabilities in Afghanistan. In J. F. Trani (Ed.), Development Efforts in Afghanistan: Is There a Will and a Way? The Case of Disability and Vulnerability (pp. 75–102). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  57. Trani, J. F., Bakhshi, P., & Nandipati, A. (2012). “Delivering” Education; Maintaining Inequality. The Case of Children with Disabilities in Afghanistan. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(3), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trani, J.-F., Kumar, P., Ballard, E., & Chandola, T. (2017). Assessment of Progress Towards Universal Health Coverage for People with Disabilities in Afghanistan: A Multilevel Analysis of Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 5(8), e828–e837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perception Index 2017: Afghanistan. Last accessed 1 Mar 2018.
  60. UNDP. (1997). Poverty Eradication and Community Empowerment: Afghanistan Peace Initiative 1997–1999. New York: United Nation Development Programme.
  61. UNDP. (2005). Democratization and Civil society empowerment Programme. United Nations Development Programme Afghanistan Country Office, Kabul. Last accessed 6 Jan 2015.
  62. UNDP. (2007). National Programme for Action on Disability (NPAD), 1 January 2007–31 March 2007. Quarterly Project Report (1st quarter 2007). United Nations Development Programme. Last accessed 11 Dec 2014.
  63. UNDP. (2018). Human Development Data (1990 to 2015). Last accessed 1 Mar 2018.
  64. Uphoff, N. (1996). Why NGOs Are Not a Third Sector: A Sectoral Analysis with Some Thoughts on Accountability, Sustainability and Evaluation. In M. Edwards & D. Hulme (Eds.), NGOs: Performance and Accountability – Beyond the Magic Bullet (pp. 17–30). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  65. Van de Walle, N. (2001). African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis 1979–1999. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. World Bank. (2017). Afghanistan Poverty Status Update: Progress at Risk. Kabul, Afghanistan: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  68. World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators (online). Last accessed 1 Mar 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parul Bakhshi
    • 1
  • Jean-François Trani
    • 2
  1. 1.Brown School and Program in Occupational TherapyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Brown SchoolWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations