Advertisement

Loving: Emotional Movements

  • Lydia Martens
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

This chapter presents an analysis of the aesthetic organisation of commercial environments and objects of early childhood. The aim is to demonstrate the role aesthetic organisation plays in the shaping of the particular understanding of ‘the young child’ as loveable. I purposefully start the analysis of the teleoaffective structuration of child caring with the quality of the young child as loveable, because knowing ‘the child’ in this way operates as such a resounding cultural obviousness, that it renders examination almost redundant, and because the loving quality of the young child serves as an ‘anchor’ for other elements in the teleoaffective structure, including those of protecting and purifying, around which pecuniary value is created. Elements of the aesthetic of early childhood outlined in this chapter, and found in the commercial world of young children and child caring, include the use of colours and colour schemes, the definition of ‘cute’ objects, designed as play mates for children and used as affective devices targeting adults, and conventions in the visual representation of young children. I close with a discussion on the use of certain kinds of objects in practices of personal life lovemaking. In and through these various practices, ‘the young child’ is known as lovable, not only in the privacy of family life, but as a signifier in a broader generational and symbolic culture of childhood.

Bibliography

  1. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The normal chaos of love, 1–44. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brownlie, J., and V. Leith. 2011. Social bundles: Thinking through the infant body. Childhood 18 (2): 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook. 2009. The ingratiating child: Conundrums and questions in the commercial depiction of childhood. Unpublished paper for The Ethics of Representing Childhood: Popular Culture, Performance, and Pedagogy, 1–19, March 5–7, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  4. Cross, G. 2004a. Wondrous innocence print Advertising and the origins of permissive child rearing in the US. Journal of Consumer Culture 4 (2): 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cross, G. 2004b. The cute and the cool: Wondrous innocence and modern American children’s culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Djohari, N. 2016. Trading in unicorns: The role of exchange etiquette in managing the online second-hand sale of sentimental babywearing wraps. Journal of Material Culture 21 (3): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finkelstein, J. 1989. Dining out: A sociology of modern manners. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frontline: The Persuaders. (2004). Documentary about the American advertising industry. Web link: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/view/.
  9. Furedi, F. 2001. Paranoid parenting. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gregson, N., and L. Crewe. 1997. The bargain, the knowledge, and the spectacle: Making sense of consumption in the space of the car-boot sale. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, D. 2001. Cute, quaint, hungry and romantic: The aesthetics of consumerism. Cambridge, MA: DaCapo Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hinde, R.A., and L.A. Barden. 1985. The evolution of the teddy bear. Animal Behaviour 33 (4): 1371–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland, P. 2004. Picturing childhood: The myth of the child in popular imagery. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
  14. Honeyman. 2005. Elusive childhood: Impossible representations in modern fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kehily, M.J. 2014. For the love of small things: Consumerism and the making of maternal identities. Young Consumers 15 (3): 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawler, S. 2000. Mothering the self: Mothers, daughters, subjectivities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Layne, L. 1999. The child as gift: New directions in the study of Euro–American gift exchange. In Transformative motherhood: On giving and getting in a consumer culture, ed. L. Layne, 1–27. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Layne, L. 2000. He was a real baby, with baby things: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture 5 (3): 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lupton, D. 2000. ‘A love/hate relationship’: The ideals and experiences of first-time mothers. Journal of Sociology 36 (1): 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lupton, D. 2013. Infant embodiment and interembodiment: A review of sociocultural perspectives. Childhood 20 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marks, L.U. 2000. The skin of the film: Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mauss, M. 2000. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, D. 1998. A theory of shopping. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morris, P.H., V. Reddy, and R.C. Bunting. 1995. The survival of the cutest: Who’s responsible for the evolution of the teddy bear? Animal Behaviour 50 (6): 1697–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murcott, A. 1993. Purity and pollution: Body management and the social place of infancy. In Body matters: Essays on the sociology of the body, ed. S. Scott and D. Morgan, 122–134. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  26. Pink, S. 2009. Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scanlon, J. 1995. Inarticulate longings: The ladies’ home journal, gender, and the promises of consumer culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Smart, C. 2007. Personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, A. 2013. Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, J.S., L. Layne, and D.F. Wozniak. 2004. Consuming motherhood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, C. 2005. Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  32. Traver, A. 2013. On markets and motherhoods: The case of American mothers of children adopted from China. In Motherhoods, markets and consumption: The making of mothers in contemporary Western cultures, ed. S. O’Donohoe, M. Hogg, P. Maclaran, L. Martens, and L. Stevens, 210–221. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. van den Cruyce, N., J. Bauwens, and K. Segers. 2009. Reflections of a child: Depicting healthy childhood in the 1940s and 1960s. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 87 (3–4): 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Varga, D. 2009a. Teddy’s bear and the sociocultural transfiguration of savage beasts into innocent children, 1890–1920. Journal of American Culture 32 (2): 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Varga, D. 2009b. Babes in the woods: Wilderness aesthetics in children’s stories and toys, 1830–1915. Society & Animals 17 (3): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keele UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations